本文選題：撤銷論文 + PubMed　； 參考：《中國科技期刊研究》2016年04期

【摘要】：【目的】研究PubMed數(shù)據(jù)庫撤銷論文總體情況和學(xué)術(shù)影響,以期提高科研工作者對撤銷論文現(xiàn)象的認(rèn)識(shí)和警惕�！痉椒ā刻崛ubMed中截至2015年5月12日所有被撤銷論文的時(shí)間、第一作者國別、來源期刊等。【結(jié)果】檢索到撤銷論文3676篇,主要集中在美國、日本、中國、德國和印度。2013年較2000年全球撤銷論文數(shù)增加約25倍,撤銷率增長約12.5倍。我國2013年撤銷論文數(shù)較2004年增長7倍多。論文撤銷后仍會(huì)被引用,期刊影響因子主要介于1.0~3.0。【結(jié)論】雖然撤銷論文具有一定時(shí)滯性,但越來越多的論文被撤銷在一定程度上遏制了學(xué)術(shù)不端行為。學(xué)術(shù)環(huán)境的凈化需要研究者、編輯部、數(shù)據(jù)庫出版商及相關(guān)科研部門等同仁的共同努力與探索。
[Abstract]:[objective] to study the general situation and academic influence of withdrawing papers from PubMed database, in order to raise the awareness and vigilance of researchers on the phenomenon of withdrawing papers. [methods] the time of extracting all cancelled papers from PubMed as of May 12, 2015, (results) 3676 papers were retrieved, mainly in the United States, Japan, China, Germany and India. The number of papers withdrawn in 2013 was about 25 times higher than that in 2000, and the revocation rate was about 12.5 times higher than that in 2000. The number of papers withdrawn in China in 2013 is more than seven times higher than that in 2004. The influence factors of journals are mainly between 1.0 and 3.0. [conclusion] although the withdrawal of papers has a certain delay, more and more papers have been withdrawn to a certain extent to curb academic misconduct. The purification of academic environment requires the joint efforts and exploration of researchers, editorial departments, database publishers and related research departments.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬第一醫(yī)院圖書館;
【基金】：中國圖書館學(xué)會(huì)醫(yī)院圖書館委員會(huì)2015—2016年度科學(xué)研究基金項(xiàng)目“生物醫(yī)學(xué)出版物自我凈化知識(shí)圖譜”(項(xiàng)目編號:Ytwkyxm15010)
【分類號】：G353.1;G237.5
，

本文編號：2029808