本文選題：隨機(jī)前沿分析 + 知識(shí)交流效率　； 參考：《現(xiàn)代情報(bào)》2017年06期

【摘要】：[目的 /意義]評(píng)價(jià)期刊知識(shí)交流效率對(duì)正確評(píng)價(jià)期刊在學(xué)術(shù)交流中的地位以及作用具有重要的參考價(jià)值。[方法/過程]選取29種CSSCI管理學(xué)期刊為對(duì)象,構(gòu)建學(xué)術(shù)期刊知識(shí)交流效率評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。采用信息熵方法計(jì)算學(xué)術(shù)期刊知識(shí)產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)權(quán)重,并合并成一個(gè)綜合產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)。采用隨機(jī)前沿分析方法 SFA測(cè)算學(xué)術(shù)期刊知識(shí)交流效率。[結(jié)果 /結(jié)論]期刊知識(shí)交流效率是評(píng)價(jià)期刊影響力的重要指標(biāo),CSSCI管理學(xué)期刊知識(shí)交流效率整體較低,期刊之間效率差距較大。
[Abstract]:Objective / significance: to evaluate the efficiency of periodical knowledge exchange has important reference value to evaluate correctly the position and function of periodical in academic exchange. [methods] 29 kinds of CSSCI management journals were selected as objects, and the evaluation index system of knowledge exchange efficiency of academic journals was constructed. The information entropy method is used to calculate the weight of knowledge output index of academic journals and to merge it into a comprehensive output index. The efficiency of knowledge exchange in academic journals was measured by random frontier analysis (SFA). Results / conclusion: the efficiency of periodical knowledge exchange is an important index to evaluate the influence of journals. The efficiency of CSSCI management journals is relatively low, and there is a wide gap between the efficiency of journals.
【作者單位】： 南昌大學(xué)新聞與傳播學(xué)院;湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：江西省社會(huì)科學(xué)“十三五”規(guī)劃青年項(xiàng)目“人文社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)期刊知識(shí)交流效率測(cè)度、影響因素及收斂性研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16TQ06)
【分類號(hào)】：G237.5;G353.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1780949