發(fā)布時間：2018-04-18 13:55

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡 + 著作權侵權　； 參考：《河南師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術的高速發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡已經(jīng)融入到我們的生活中,在為我們的生活帶來許多便利,同時網(wǎng)絡侵權行為所帶來的問題也日益嚴重。尤其是作品的傳播,其方式從傳統(tǒng)紙質(zhì)版擴展到現(xiàn)代網(wǎng)絡版,其途徑由網(wǎng)絡服務提供者直接通過網(wǎng)絡平臺媒介以求實現(xiàn),這一形式的轉(zhuǎn)變不僅使文化傳播更加廣泛,而且也使著作權保護這個問題從現(xiàn)實走向了虛擬。隨之而來,網(wǎng)絡著作權侵權的案件也層出不窮,加之網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境的一系列特點例如虛擬性、隱蔽性、傳播快和覆蓋廣等,也使網(wǎng)絡著作權的保護問題愈來愈變得更為棘手。網(wǎng)絡服務提供者,主體廣泛,責任認定困難,針對這方面的法律法規(guī)也亟待完善。因此,當網(wǎng)絡著作權侵權案件出現(xiàn)時,網(wǎng)絡服務提供者往往成為眾矢之的。網(wǎng)絡服務提供者在網(wǎng)絡著作權侵權案件中是否應該承擔責任、應當承擔什么樣的責任、處罰的力度應在何種程度比較合適等等,這些問題在司法界和實務界一直存有爭議。為此,我國立法及司法也給于了極大的關注,出臺了一系列的法律予以規(guī)范,但是法律總是有滯后性的,不斷地研究此類問題具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。本文主要采用舉例子、比較分析等方法,從從四方面闡述了網(wǎng)絡服務提供者的著作權侵權問題,主要內(nèi)容是網(wǎng)絡服務提供者的概念分類、網(wǎng)絡服務提供者著作權侵權行為形式以及網(wǎng)絡服務提供者應當承擔責任的理論依據(jù),明確了網(wǎng)絡服務提供者承擔侵權責任的原理,結合我國的現(xiàn)實情況以及例如百度文庫侵權案等案件入手,歸責原則、間接侵權行為、主觀過錯和賠償性制度作為切入點,指出我國網(wǎng)絡服務提供者著作權侵權責任制度的不足,結合國外的先進國家的法律,例如美國的《數(shù)字千年立法》、德國的《信息和通訊服務法》等,同時思考我國的現(xiàn)有法律,分析出優(yōu)點和不足,以此得出相關的啟示,經(jīng)過論述以及結合國外的先進法律,分析思考我國的不足之處,從歸責原則、間接侵權行為、主觀過錯和賠償性制度四方面,淺談怎樣完善我國的立法提出粗淺的意見和建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, the network has been integrated into our life, which brings us a lot of convenience. At the same time, the problems caused by network infringement are becoming more and more serious.In particular, the dissemination of works is extended from the traditional paper version to the modern online version, and its way is realized by the network service providers directly through the network platform media. This form of transformation not only makes the spread of culture more extensive,It also makes the problem of copyright protection from reality to fictitious.Subsequently, the network copyright infringement cases also emerge in endlessly, in addition to a series of characteristics of the network environment, such as virtual, hidden, fast transmission and wide coverage, also makes the network copyright protection more and more difficult.The network service provider, the main body is extensive, the responsibility is difficult, the law and regulations in this respect also need to be perfected urgently.Therefore, when network copyright infringement cases appear, network service providers often become the target.Whether the network service provider should bear the responsibility in the network copyright infringement case, what kind of responsibility should bear, what degree of punishment should be appropriate and so on, these questions have been disputed in the judicial and the practical field.Therefore, the legislation and judicature of our country have been paid great attention to, and a series of laws have been issued to regulate them, but the law is always lagging behind, so it is of great practical significance to study this kind of problem constantly.This paper mainly introduces the copyright infringement problem of network service provider from four aspects by using examples, comparative analysis and other methods. The main content is the concept classification of network service provider.The form of copyright infringement by network service provider and the theoretical basis that network service provider should bear liability, which make clear the principle of network service provider to bear tort liability.Starting with the reality of our country and cases such as Baidu Library infringement case, the principle of imputation, indirect tort, subjective fault and compensatory system are taken as the entry point.This paper points out the deficiency of copyright tort liability system of network service provider in our country, combines the laws of advanced countries abroad, such as the Digital Millennium legislation of the United States and the Information and Communication Service Law of Germany, and so on. At the same time, it also considers the existing laws of our country.By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages, we can draw the relevant enlightenment. After discussing and combining the advanced laws of foreign countries, we analyze and think about the shortcomings of our country, from the four aspects of imputation principle, indirect tort, subjective fault and compensatory system.A brief talk on how to perfect the legislation of our country and put forward some superficial opinions and suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：河南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王軍權;;網(wǎng)絡話語權的規(guī)制模式研究[J];法律適用;2015年02期

2 徐偉;;網(wǎng)絡侵權治理中通知移除制度的局限性及其破解[J];法學;2015年01期

3 韓赤風;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務提供者的義務與責任——以《德國電信媒體法》為視角[J];法學雜志;2014年10期

4 王英;;網(wǎng)絡服務提供者責任限制制度的國際觀察[J];圖書館建設;2014年06期

5 羅莉;;論懲罰性賠償在知識產(chǎn)權法中的引進及實施[J];法學;2014年04期

6 徐偉;;網(wǎng)絡服務提供者“知道”認定新詮——兼駁網(wǎng)絡服務提供者“應知”論[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2014年02期

7 魯甜;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)開放平臺服務提供商的侵權責任認定研究[J];中南財經(jīng)政法大學研究生學報;2013年06期

8 王艷芳;;《關于審理侵害信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權民事糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2013年09期

9 孟傳香;;關于網(wǎng)絡服務提供者不作為刑事責任問題的探討[J];重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2012年06期

10 魯春雅;;論網(wǎng)絡服務提供者的侵權責任[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2012年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 林可挺;論網(wǎng)絡服務提供者侵權行為認定及責任承擔[D];華東政法大學;2012年

2 王鑫;網(wǎng)絡服務提供者不作為侵權行為研究[D];復旦大學;2012年

3 錢騰飛;網(wǎng)絡服務提供者侵權責任研究[D];廣東商學院;2011年

，

本文編號：1768643