本文選題：續(xù)寫作品　切入點：獨創(chuàng)性　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息技術(shù)和產(chǎn)業(yè)的迅速發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)國際性、交互性的進一步加強,特別是網(wǎng)絡(luò)文學(xué)的出現(xiàn),沖擊著傳統(tǒng)的著作權(quán)制度,使得過去一直沒有得到足夠重視的續(xù)寫問題日益突顯出來。然而,不管是在理論界還是實踐中,不管是國內(nèi)還是國外,對續(xù)寫行為如何定性、如何規(guī)范,都沒有一個統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。因此,本文認(rèn)為探究續(xù)寫作品的著作權(quán)問題對我國著作權(quán)制度的發(fā)展和完善具有重要意義。 本文主體共有四章:第一章案例介紹,通過中外幾則案例,引出續(xù)寫行為存在的爭議以及對續(xù)寫作品問題研究的重要性。第二章續(xù)寫作品的法律本質(zhì)問題研究。首先是對續(xù)寫作品的定義、表現(xiàn)形式及分類的深入把握。本文認(rèn)為續(xù)寫作品就是在已有作品(已完成或者未完成)的基礎(chǔ)上延展而成的新作品。為便于討論續(xù)寫作品與原作品之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系,文章將續(xù)寫作品分為有權(quán)續(xù)寫和無權(quán)續(xù)寫兩大類。本章的重點是對續(xù)寫作品的本質(zhì)特征及其法律屬性的分析,這也是學(xué)界分歧較大的地方。本文認(rèn)為續(xù)寫作品具有獨創(chuàng)性、利益性以及對原作品的依附性、反作用性,其中獨創(chuàng)性是續(xù)寫作品的本質(zhì)屬性,是續(xù)寫作品享有著作人身權(quán)和財產(chǎn)權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)。第三章是對續(xù)寫作品侵權(quán)性的分析。承認(rèn)續(xù)寫作品著作權(quán)法上作品的地位,并非就否定了它的侵權(quán)特性。首先,續(xù)寫作品侵犯了原作品的完整性,是侵犯原作品作者保護作品完整權(quán)的行為;未經(jīng)原作者授權(quán)或者許可的續(xù)寫,是對原作者潛在經(jīng)濟價值的竊取,是侵犯原作者著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)的行為。其次,分析續(xù)寫作品是否是對原作品的合理使用,應(yīng)特別強調(diào)續(xù)寫作品的獨創(chuàng)性。如果將合理使用簡單的看作是正當(dāng)使用著作權(quán)作品的一種侵權(quán)豁免,那么后續(xù)作品享有這種豁免的前提是其獨創(chuàng)性。再次,續(xù)寫作品利用原作品具有獨創(chuàng)性的作品名稱及原作的人物、情節(jié)等要素進行續(xù)寫,著作權(quán)人可以通過主張保護作品完整權(quán)或作品整體的著作權(quán)來維護其著作權(quán)。第四章是完善我國續(xù)寫權(quán)制度的立法構(gòu)想。網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下新的文學(xué)作品形式的出現(xiàn),為現(xiàn)代著作權(quán)制度提出了一個新的課題。然而,不管是現(xiàn)有的法律法規(guī)還是學(xué)界給出的解決方案,均有不足之處,不能很好的解決續(xù)寫作品與原作品之間的權(quán)利沖突問題。本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)該構(gòu)建以續(xù)寫權(quán)和續(xù)寫優(yōu)先權(quán)為內(nèi)容的續(xù)寫權(quán)制度。在續(xù)寫作品和原作品相互制約的關(guān)系中尋找到一個平衡點,在最大限度保護原作品著作權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)上,給予續(xù)作者合理的著作權(quán),從而實現(xiàn)著作權(quán)法促進社會主義文化和科學(xué)事業(yè)發(fā)展與繁榮的目的。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network information technology and industry, the international and interactive network, especially the emergence of network literature, impact the traditional copyright system.So that the past has not been enough attention to the issue of follow-up increasingly prominent.However, no matter in theory or practice, whether at home or abroad, there is no uniform standard on how to define and standardize the behavior of continuation.Therefore, it is of great significance for the development and perfection of the copyright system to explore the copyright problem of the continued works.There are four chapters in this paper: the first chapter introduces the case, through several Chinese and foreign cases, leads to the controversy of the sequel behavior and the importance of the research on the issue of the continuation of the work.The second chapter is about the legal essence of the works.First of all, the definition, expression and classification of the continuation works are deeply understood.This paper holds that the continuation works are new works based on the existing works (completed or incomplete).In order to facilitate the discussion of the relationship between the rights and obligations of the continuation works and the original works, this paper divides the continuation works into two categories: the right to continue and the right to continue.This chapter focuses on the analysis of the essential characteristics and legal attributes of the continuation works.This paper holds that the continuation works have originality, interest, dependence and reaction to the original works, in which originality is the essential attribute of the continuation works, and is the basis for the continuation works to enjoy the personal rights and the property rights of the works.The third chapter is the analysis of the tort of the continuation works.The recognition of the status of a work in copyright law does not negate its infringing character.First of all, the continuation of the work infringes the integrity of the original work and is an infringement on the author's right to protect the integrity of the work. A continuation without the authorisation or permission of the original author is a theft of the potential economic value of the original author.It is the act of infringing the property right of the original author.Secondly, we should emphasize the originality of the continuation works by analyzing whether the continuation works are the rational use of the original works.If reasonable use is regarded as a kind of infringement exemption for the legitimate use of copyright works, the prerequisite for the subsequent works to enjoy this exemption is their originality.Thirdly, the continuation works take advantage of the original works' original names, original characters, plot and other elements to continue writing. The copyright owner can protect their copyright by protecting the integrity of the work or the copyright of the work as a whole.The fourth chapter is the legislative conception of perfecting the system of the right to renew in our country.The emergence of new forms of literary works under the network environment presents a new subject for the modern copyright system.However, no matter the existing laws and regulations or the solutions given by the academic community, there are some shortcomings, which can not solve the conflict of rights between the continuation works and the original works.In this paper, we should construct the system of renew right and sequestration priority.In the relationship between the continuous work and the original work, we find a balance point. On the basis of the maximum protection of the copyright of the original work, we give the author a reasonable copyright.Thus, copyright law promotes the development and prosperity of socialist culture and science.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 鄭瑞琨;著作權(quán)合理使用法律性質(zhì)分析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年04期

2 陳洪宗,郭海榮;論續(xù)寫作品的特性及其著作權(quán)問題[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1999年02期

3 李亮;論續(xù)寫作品的著作權(quán)保護[J];河北法學(xué);2005年02期

4 嚴(yán)正;論續(xù)寫作品對原作品完整權(quán)的影響[J];河南圖書館學(xué)刊;2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 衛(wèi)志遠;續(xù)寫作品法律制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1714233