本文關(guān)鍵詞： BT技術(shù)濫用 版權(quán) 侵權(quán)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： P2P技術(shù)深刻地改變了網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的信息傳輸方式,它使得個人用戶之間能夠進(jìn)行大規(guī)模的直接信息交換。屬于第三類P2P技術(shù)的BT技術(shù)誕生后,迅速在全世界范圍內(nèi)得到廣泛應(yīng)用,但是目前這種應(yīng)用主要是建立在侵犯版權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)之上,是BT技術(shù)的濫用。 本文從BT技術(shù)的運行原理和美國解決P2P技術(shù)濫用的法理依據(jù)出發(fā),通過分析海盜灣案件和香港陳乃明案,得出BT技術(shù)濫用侵犯版權(quán)時主要涉及三類侵權(quán)主體。第一類是BT種子的發(fā)布者,第二類是BT軟件的使用者,前兩類涉及直接侵犯版權(quán),第三類是BT軟件提供者和BT網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商,第三類涉及間接侵犯版權(quán)。為了應(yīng)對BT技術(shù)濫用侵犯版權(quán)問題,本文從法律、技術(shù)和市場三個方面,選擇了版權(quán)補(bǔ)償金制度、數(shù)字權(quán)利管理和新商業(yè)運行模式進(jìn)行了初步的探討。 補(bǔ)償金制度在我國屬于法律空白地帶。通過補(bǔ)償金制度在德國的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展,分析補(bǔ)償金制度的實質(zhì),認(rèn)為我國目前雖還不具備全面建立補(bǔ)償金制度的條件,但也不應(yīng)忽視補(bǔ)償金制度。對待補(bǔ)償金制度,我國應(yīng)當(dāng)采取積極而又謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度。 數(shù)字版權(quán)管理是一種在數(shù)字化產(chǎn)品中預(yù)先設(shè)置的,保護(hù)權(quán)利、控制使用和進(jìn)行管理的技術(shù)工具。在一定程度上,運用技術(shù)手段可以遏制盜版和非法使用,從而保障作者、出版商、銷售商在數(shù)字化產(chǎn)品市場銷售中獲得利益,并保障用戶的合法利用權(quán)利。從各國的立法來看,各國普遍認(rèn)可數(shù)字版權(quán)管理技術(shù),但是這并非說明數(shù)字技術(shù)管理就是解決版權(quán)數(shù)字困境的出路。數(shù)字技術(shù)管理不能阻擋黑客的進(jìn)攻,并且技術(shù)措施的保護(hù)與合理使用之間存在矛盾。為了利益的平衡,著作權(quán)法中不光要有數(shù)字技術(shù)管理,也要有規(guī)避數(shù)字技術(shù)管理的例外。我國《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》第12條中以窮盡式列舉方式規(guī)定了規(guī)避行為的例外。要完善數(shù)字權(quán)利管理,本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)在《著作權(quán)法》中明文規(guī)定規(guī)避行為的例外,并且不宜采用窮盡式列舉方式規(guī)定。 無論是法律措施還是技術(shù)措施,都必須經(jīng)過市場的檢驗。版權(quán)人的應(yīng)得利益也必須在市場中才能實現(xiàn)。市場作出的回應(yīng)是創(chuàng)建新的商業(yè)模式。美國好萊塢與BT公司合作開發(fā)的“BT娛樂網(wǎng)”和蘋果公司的iPod播放器加iTunes音樂商店都是在線市場中成功的例子,但是這類通過授權(quán)的版權(quán)作品共享模式也面臨著一些挑戰(zhàn),最終的有效性還存在疑問。國內(nèi)BT網(wǎng)站過于細(xì)化,多為個人網(wǎng)站,有影響的網(wǎng)站多用于音樂、視頻,其盈利的方式單一�，F(xiàn)在,因為沒有許可證,多數(shù)BT網(wǎng)站被整頓關(guān)停,BT網(wǎng)站似乎很難有機(jī)會重新運營。本文認(rèn)為版權(quán)人與國內(nèi)BT網(wǎng)站的合作在短期內(nèi)不可能實現(xiàn),但同時也認(rèn)為,其他有許可證的資力雄厚的P2P網(wǎng)站應(yīng)該能與版權(quán)人合作,開拓新的商業(yè)運營模式。
[Abstract]:P2P technology has profoundly changed the mode of information transmission in the network, which makes it possible for individuals to exchange information directly on a large scale. After the birth of BT technology, which belongs to the third type of P2P technology. It has been widely used all over the world, but at present, it is mainly based on copyright infringement and is the abuse of BT technology. This paper analyzes the Pirate Bay case and the Hong Kong Chen Naiming case by analyzing the operating principle of BT technology and the legal basis of solving the abuse of P2P technology in the United States. BT technology abuse infringement of copyright mainly involves three types of subjects. The first category is the publisher of BT seeds, the second category is the users of BT software, the first two categories involve direct infringement of copyright. The third category is BT software providers and BT network service providers, the third category involves indirect copyright infringement. In order to deal with the problem of BT technology abuse infringement, this paper from the legal, technical and market aspects. The copyright compensation system, digital rights management and new business operation mode are discussed. Compensation system in our country is a legal blank zone. Through the emergence and development of compensation system in Germany, the essence of compensation system is analyzed, and it is concluded that China does not have the conditions to establish compensation system in an all-round way at present. However, we should not ignore the compensation system. China should take an active and cautious attitude towards the compensation system. Digital rights management is a pre-set in digital products, the protection of rights, control and management of the use of technical tools. To a certain extent, the use of technical means can curb piracy and illegal use. In order to protect the author, publisher, seller in the digital product market to obtain benefits, and to protect the legitimate rights of users. From the legislation of countries, countries generally recognize digital rights management technology. But this does not mean that digital technology management is the solution to the digital dilemma of copyright. Digital technology management can not stop the attack of hackers. And there is a contradiction between the protection of technical measures and the reasonable use. In order to balance the interests, there must not only be digital technology management in copyright law. There should also be exceptions to the management of circumvention of digital technology. In Article 12 of the regulations on the Protection of the right to spread the Information Network, the exception of circumvention is stipulated in the exhaustive enumeration method, and the management of digital rights should be perfected. This paper holds that the exception of circumvention should be explicitly stipulated in copyright Law, and it is not appropriate to use exhaustive enumeration. Whether legal or technical. All must be tested by the market. The copyright owner's benefits must also be realized in the market. The response of the market is to create a new business model. "BT entertainment network" developed by Hollywood and BT co., Ltd. Apple's iPod player and the iTunes music store are all examples of success in the online marketplace. However, this mode of copyright sharing through licensing also faces some challenges, and the ultimate effectiveness is still questionable. Domestic BT websites are too detailed, mostly personal sites, and influential sites are mostly used for music. Video, its way of making money is single. Now, without a license, most BT sites have been shut down. BT website seems to have a difficult opportunity to re-operate. This paper believes that the copyright owner and domestic BT site cooperation is not possible in the short term, but also think. Other licensed P2P sites should be able to work with copyright owners to develop new business models.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉家瑞;論中國版權(quán)間接責(zé)任制度的建立——兼論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任制度的完善[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年11期

2 王遷;P2P軟件提供者的幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任——美國最高法院Grokster案判決評析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年09期

3 張耕;陳文;;完善網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商間接責(zé)任制度的思考[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年11期

4 劉婷;;BT技術(shù)引發(fā)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題分析——兼談P2P技術(shù)的法律對策[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 王遷;“索尼案”二十年祭——回顧、反思與啟示[J];科技與法律;2004年04期

6 王遷;論版權(quán)法中的間接責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2005年02期

7 宋偉;程兆齊;;P2P技術(shù)引發(fā)的版權(quán)侵權(quán)問題之綜合研究[J];科技管理研究;2008年05期

8 單體禹;;國內(nèi)外P2P軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件簡介及特點[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2008年02期

9 祝建軍;譚明華;;P2P服務(wù)提供者間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任的認(rèn)定——以電影《七劍》作品著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛案為例[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年01期

，

本文編號：1458385