本文關(guān)鍵詞： 信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán) 法定賠償 權(quán)重 系數(shù)　出處：《華僑大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)是著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的一種，網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)打破了傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)制度的內(nèi)在平衡，權(quán)利人難以控制其享有的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)，糾紛也日益增多。現(xiàn)有的侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)穆窂絻H是有關(guān)法律規(guī)定，即受害人的實(shí)際損失、侵權(quán)人所得利益、法定賠償額等三種計(jì)算方法，由于《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播條例》等相關(guān)著作權(quán)立法的局限性，在審判實(shí)踐中暴露出了規(guī)則確定性較低、可預(yù)測(cè)性較差、經(jīng)濟(jì)效率較低等弊端，因此，為應(yīng)對(duì)新技術(shù)發(fā)展，對(duì)侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的賠償制度必須具有新的思路和立法范式。本文從百度文庫事件入手，利用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析的利益平衡、帕累托最優(yōu)等理論方法，通過借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)理念，思考可行的對(duì)策。在通過剖析具體案例，，并對(duì)司法審判實(shí)踐的考量因素如侵權(quán)作品的知名度、許可使用費(fèi)、市場(chǎng)價(jià)值、侵權(quán)的主觀過錯(cuò)、點(diǎn)播次數(shù)等一一予以分解后，重新整合，并創(chuàng)新地提出仿效刑事審判的量刑規(guī)范化，將法定賠償規(guī)則與法官的自由裁量權(quán)靈活結(jié)合，并采用指標(biāo)權(quán)重體系的數(shù)學(xué)工具，以公式化說理的方式來解決當(dāng)前法定賠償額的計(jì)算不公開、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一、缺乏效率和沒有彈性的瓶頸問題，希望能對(duì)有關(guān)立法部門建制網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度有所助益。最后，本文期待有關(guān)部門能夠?qū)徤髦贫ㄆ胶庵鳈?quán)權(quán)利保護(hù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技發(fā)展的法律規(guī)范，使制度具有可預(yù)期性，最大限度地防范侵權(quán)損害的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:Information network communication right is a kind of property right of works. Network technology has broken the inherent balance of traditional copyright system, and the right owner can not control the information network communication right he enjoys. The existing path of tort compensation is only related to the law, namely the actual loss of the victim, the interests of the infringer, the legal compensation. Because of the limitation of the relevant copyright legislation, such as "Information Network Communication regulations", it has exposed some disadvantages in the trial practice, such as low certainty of rules, poor predictability, low economic efficiency and so on. In order to cope with the development of new technology, the compensation system for infringing the right of information network communication must have a new thinking and legislative paradigm. This paper starts with the Baidu Library incident and makes use of the benefit balance of economic analysis. Pareto optimal theory and methods, through the reference of foreign ideas, thinking of feasible countermeasures. Through the analysis of specific cases, and judicial practice considerations such as the popularity of infringing works, licensing fees. Market value, the subjective fault of infringement, the number of times on demand are decomposed one by one, and re-integrated, and innovatively proposed to follow the criminal trial of sentencing standardization. Combining the statutory compensation rules with the discretion of the judge, and adopting the mathematical tools of the index weight system to solve the current legal compensation calculation in the form of formulaic reasoning, the standard is not unified. Lack of efficiency and lack of flexibility of the bottleneck, I hope to be relevant to the relevant legislative branch of the system of tort damages in the legislative network to help. Finally. This paper expects relevant departments to carefully formulate legal norms to balance the protection of copyright rights with the development of network science and technology so as to make the system predictable and to prevent the occurrence of infringement damage to the maximum extent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡唯嶸;數(shù)字圖書館引發(fā)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)糾紛[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年01期

2 張以標(biāo);;論以權(quán)利價(jià)值為中心的著作權(quán)法定賠償制度[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年03期

3 毛劍平;哲學(xué)視野中的法律文化建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué);1995年01期

4 梁棟;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中音樂作品著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償數(shù)額的計(jì)算[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年19期

5 陳敏;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)問題探究[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2009年02期

6 蔣志培,張輝;依法加強(qiáng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)的司法保護(hù)——談最高法院網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)案件適用法律的司法解釋[J];人民司法;2001年02期

7 熊琦;;著作權(quán)的法經(jīng)濟(jì)分析范式——兼評(píng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)利益平衡理論[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2011年04期

8 李建星;;影視作品網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)法定賠償額研究——以310例判決為樣本[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

9 董天平 ,惷中林;著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償問題研討會(huì)綜述[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2000年06期

10 韓成軍;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的判定及損害賠償研究[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

本文編號(hào)：1446702