本文選題：寶鋼發(fā)展 + 政府干預(yù)��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：政府經(jīng)濟(jì)職能的內(nèi)容中,很重要的一方面就是保持宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)定性。穩(wěn)定的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)是市場(chǎng)活動(dòng)的主體的共同要求;實(shí)踐表明,市場(chǎng)的自我組織機(jī)制不可能消除經(jīng)濟(jì)周期性波動(dòng),唯有依靠政府的宏觀調(diào)控才有可能緩解波動(dòng)。改革開放初期,國內(nèi)各行各業(yè)開始走上新的發(fā)展道路,鋼材作為國家發(fā)展的重要戰(zhàn)略物質(zhì),變得尤為稀缺;寶鋼集團(tuán)被稱為中國改革開放的產(chǎn)物,1978年12月23日,就在十一屆三中全會(huì)閉幕的第二天,在中國上海寶山區(qū)長(zhǎng)江之畔打下第一根樁;隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模的快速增長(zhǎng),我國鋼鐵企業(yè)也隨之迅猛發(fā)展,無論是鋼鐵企業(yè)的數(shù)量,還是鋼鐵產(chǎn)量,都在突飛猛進(jìn),逐步由產(chǎn)品稀缺變成產(chǎn)能過剩。從1996年起,國家就開始通過相關(guān)宏觀調(diào)控政策限制鋼鐵行業(yè)進(jìn)一步盲目擴(kuò)張,但政策的效果不明顯,主要是抑制企業(yè)規(guī)模擴(kuò)大意愿的市場(chǎng)條件沒有形成,與各地區(qū)的快速發(fā)展勢(shì)頭不相符。一方面,在國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展和大規(guī)模投資的拉動(dòng)下,鋼材需求快速增長(zhǎng),帶動(dòng)鋼鐵產(chǎn)能增長(zhǎng);另一方面,鋼鐵企業(yè)即便是在微利的情況下,仍然有增產(chǎn)擴(kuò)能的沖動(dòng),地方政府處于某些方面的原因,也在一定程度上推動(dòng)了鋼鐵產(chǎn)能的擴(kuò)張。近期,國務(wù)院又出臺(tái)相關(guān)的指導(dǎo)意見,對(duì)鋼鐵行業(yè)的發(fā)展做進(jìn)一步的規(guī)劃。從改革開放初期到現(xiàn)階段,政府干預(yù)從沒間斷過。本論文主要從市場(chǎng)與制度的角度出發(fā),以國家投資大型鋼鐵企業(yè)為切入點(diǎn),對(duì)近年來關(guān)于政府干預(yù)對(duì)鋼鐵行業(yè)的影響進(jìn)行了回顧和總結(jié),包括政府干預(yù)相關(guān)理論、政府干預(yù)對(duì)鋼鐵企業(yè)經(jīng)營行為的影響、政府干預(yù)與企業(yè)績(jī)效等方面;再闡述鋼鐵企業(yè)伴隨著國家經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展而壯大,剖析現(xiàn)階段國家對(duì)鋼鐵企業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的規(guī)劃,探討行政制度對(duì)鋼鐵企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略和行為的影響機(jī)制。本文主要通過大量的數(shù)據(jù)分析,政策、文件對(duì)比,定性、定量結(jié)合分析的方法,以鋼鐵行業(yè)代表寶鋼為主要切入點(diǎn),分析政府干預(yù)的時(shí)機(jī)、手段、效果等等,討論政府干預(yù)的合法性,闡述市場(chǎng)、企業(yè)與政府干預(yù)的關(guān)系及相互的作用。
[Abstract]:In the content of the government economic function, the very important aspect is to maintain the macroeconomic stability. The stable macro-economy is the common requirement of the main body of market activities, and the practice shows that the self-organizing mechanism of the market can not eliminate the cyclical fluctuation of the economy, and only by relying on the macro-control of the government can the fluctuation be alleviated. At the beginning of reform and opening up, domestic industries began to embark on a new development path, and steel, as an important strategic material for national development, became particularly scarce. Baosteel Group was called the product of China's reform and opening up, on December 23, 1978. On the second day of the closing of the third Plenary session of the 11th CPC Central Committee, the first pile was laid on the banks of the Yangtze River in Baoshan District, Shanghai, China. With the rapid growth of China's economic scale, China's iron and steel enterprises have also developed rapidly, regardless of the number of iron and steel enterprises. Or steel production, are advancing by leaps and bounds, gradually from the scarcity of products into overcapacity. Since 1996, the state has been restricting the steel industry from further blind expansion through relevant macroeconomic control policies, but the effect of the policy is not obvious, mainly because the market conditions to restrain the willingness of enterprises to expand have not been formed. It is not in line with the rapid development momentum in various regions. On the one hand, with the rapid development of the national economy and the pull of large-scale investment, the demand for steel has increased rapidly, driving the growth of steel production capacity; on the other hand, iron and steel enterprises still have the urge to increase production and expand their capacity even under the circumstances of small profits. Local governments in some ways, also contributed to the expansion of steel capacity. Recently, the State Council issued relevant guidance, the development of the steel industry to make further planning. From the beginning of reform and opening up to the present stage, government intervention has never stopped. This paper reviews and summarizes the influence of government intervention on the iron and steel industry in recent years, including the relevant theories of government intervention, from the point of view of market and system, taking the state investment in large iron and steel enterprises as the starting point. The influence of government intervention on the operation behavior of iron and steel enterprises, the influence of government intervention and enterprise performance, and the development of iron and steel enterprises with the development of national economy, and the analysis of the current state plan for the development strategy of iron and steel enterprises, This paper discusses the influence mechanism of administrative system on the strategy and behavior of iron and steel enterprises. This article mainly through the massive data analysis, the policy, the document contrast, the qualitative, the quantitative union analysis method, takes the iron and steel industry representative Baosteel as the main entry point, analyzes the government intervention time, the means, the effect and so on. This paper discusses the legitimacy of government intervention, expounds the market, the relationship between enterprises and government intervention and their mutual effects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F426.31;D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;發(fā)改委解讀國務(wù)院《關(guān)于化解產(chǎn)能嚴(yán)重過剩矛盾的指導(dǎo)意見》[J];有色冶金節(jié)能;2014年01期

2 劉東;張秋月;陶瑞;;政府在企業(yè)并購中的干預(yù)行為比較研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2011年06期

3 劉勇;;我國鋼鐵企業(yè)“走出去”的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];武漢冶金管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

4 馬忠;劉宇;;企業(yè)多元化經(jīng)營受政府干預(yù)、企業(yè)資源的影響[J];中國軟科學(xué);2010年01期

5 張保柱;黃輝;;考慮政府干預(yù)的企業(yè)R&D行為研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢;2009年03期

6 程仲鳴;夏新平;余明桂;;政府干預(yù)、金字塔結(jié)構(gòu)與地方國有上市公司投資[J];管理世界;2008年09期

7 徐二明;張晗;;中國上市公司國有股權(quán)對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新方式的影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年15期

8 屈文洲;許年行;關(guān)家雄;吳世農(nóng);;市場(chǎng)化、政府干預(yù)與股票流動(dòng)性溢價(jià)的分配[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年04期

9 嚴(yán)萏;翁國民;;淺議企業(yè)合并中的行政干預(yù)力因素[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2008年08期

10 齊桂珍;;國內(nèi)外政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變及其理論研究綜述[J];中國特色社會(huì)主義研究;2007年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 ;發(fā)展必須是遵循經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)律的科學(xué)發(fā)展[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 劉航;;嚴(yán)控新增 求解退出 謹(jǐn)慎搬遷[N];中國冶金報(bào);2013年

3 傅光云;;重組浪潮洶涌 民營鋼企急謀資本突圍[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李江;企業(yè)并購中政府干預(yù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1912774