本文選題：政府 + 作用邊界　； 參考：《金融發(fā)展研究》2016年06期

【摘要】：本案例通過剖析某縣對轄內(nèi)一家化工企業(yè)涉及23家企業(yè)擔(dān)保圈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)事件的處置后發(fā)現(xiàn),地方政府在應(yīng)急控制風(fēng)險(xiǎn)事態(tài)蔓延上具有組織、協(xié)調(diào)等比較優(yōu)勢,但在后期推動涉險(xiǎn)企業(yè)兼并重組上則明顯遜于專業(yè)化中介組織;而后者在選擇戰(zhàn)略投資方、開展產(chǎn)業(yè)對接、合理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)資產(chǎn)定價(jià)以及精選并購模式上更具有市場化效率。在特定金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)時(shí)期,理性的和有為的政府,應(yīng)在危機(jī)事態(tài)中合理把握自己的活動邊界。
[Abstract]:After analyzing the disposal of a chemical enterprise in a county involving 23 enterprises in the guarantee circle, it is found that the local government has the comparative advantages of organization and coordination in the emergency control of the risk situation. However, in the later stage of promoting the merger and reorganization of risk-related enterprises, it is obviously inferior to the specialized intermediary organizations, while the latter has more market-oriented efficiency in selecting strategic investors, developing industrial docking, rational risk asset pricing and the mode of selective mergers and acquisitions. In a specific financial risk period, rational and promising governments should reasonably grasp their own boundaries in crisis situations.
【作者單位】： 中國人民銀行德州市中心支行;中國人民銀行臨邑縣支行;
【分類號】：F832.59;F426.7
，

本文編號：1833151