本文選題：資源錯(cuò)配　切入點(diǎn)：全要素生產(chǎn)率　出處：《華中科技大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：如何實(shí)現(xiàn)資源的有效配置一直以來都是微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究的主題。伴隨大量微觀企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)在經(jīng)濟(jì)研究中的廣泛應(yīng)用,人們開始對資源配置運(yùn)行的有效機(jī)制進(jìn)行更深入的探討。然而在眾多機(jī)制中,過去一段時(shí)間學(xué)術(shù)界大多關(guān)注資源錯(cuò)配與全要素生產(chǎn)率和金融扭曲二者之間的關(guān)系,對產(chǎn)業(yè)間結(jié)構(gòu)錯(cuò)配的研究卻顯不足。本文主要分析產(chǎn)業(yè)間結(jié)構(gòu)錯(cuò)配對中國各地區(qū)制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)率的影響。文章首先運(yùn)用Jones基于中間產(chǎn)品投入—產(chǎn)出分析結(jié)構(gòu)錯(cuò)配模型闡釋了由于企業(yè)間存在投入—產(chǎn)出關(guān)系,導(dǎo)致資源錯(cuò)配對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響具有乘數(shù)效應(yīng)。進(jìn)一步將“中間投入”這一重要變量引入Aoki跨部門均衡模型框架對其進(jìn)行適當(dāng)拓展,來探討分地區(qū)分行業(yè)間的結(jié)構(gòu)錯(cuò)配效應(yīng)及錯(cuò)配來源。在理論框架的基礎(chǔ)上,本文利用2007年中國工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)庫和2007年國民經(jīng)濟(jì)投入產(chǎn)出表進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),主要結(jié)論如下:(1)“中間投入”作為重要的生產(chǎn)要素對生產(chǎn)率的貢獻(xiàn)程度要遠(yuǎn)高于資本和勞動(dòng),因此以往大部分研究在生產(chǎn)函數(shù)中忽略掉“中間投入”是不合適的。文章的估算結(jié)果顯示“中間投入”對產(chǎn)出的貢獻(xiàn)度達(dá)到70%以上,表明我國制造業(yè)對中間產(chǎn)品投入的依賴度較高。(2)生產(chǎn)要素配置效率的差異是東、中、西部地區(qū)差距的重要原因。東部地區(qū)在資本、勞動(dòng)、中間投入方面的配置效率要高于中西部,而中部相對西部的資源配置情況并沒有占太多的優(yōu)勢。(3)食品、石油、交通運(yùn)輸和通信電子制造業(yè)對國民經(jīng)濟(jì)影響較大,且為主要的錯(cuò)配來源。尤其是后兩者的生產(chǎn)率明顯低于其他行業(yè),其生產(chǎn)要素的不當(dāng)配置對生產(chǎn)率產(chǎn)生了顯著的負(fù)面影響。根據(jù)上述結(jié)論,本文為我國合理改善地區(qū)間產(chǎn)業(yè)資源配置提供了新的思路和方案。
[Abstract]:How to realize the effective allocation of resources has always been the subject of microeconomics research. People begin to probe into the effective mechanism of resource allocation. However, in many mechanisms, the relationship between resource mismatch and total factor productivity (TFP) and financial distortion has been the focus of academic circles in the past. However, the research on inter-industry structural mismatch is not enough. This paper mainly analyzes the effect of inter-industry structural mismatch on manufacturing productivity in various regions of China. Firstly, Jones is used to analyze the structural mismatch model based on intermediate product input-output analysis. B explains the input-output relationship between enterprises, The effect of resource mismatch on economic growth has multiplier effect. Furthermore, the important variable "intermediate input" is introduced into the Aoki Intersectoral equilibrium model framework to extend it properly. Based on the theoretical framework, this paper uses the China Industrial Enterprise Database in 2007 and the input-output table of the national economy in 2007 to carry out empirical tests. The main conclusion is as follows: (1) as an important factor of production, the contribution of "intermediate input" to productivity is much higher than that of capital and labor. Therefore, it is inappropriate for most previous studies to ignore the "intermediate input" in the production function. The estimated results show that the "intermediate input" contributes more than 70% to the output. It shows that the difference in the allocation efficiency of factors of production is the important reason for the disparity among the east, the middle and the west. The allocation efficiency of the intermediate input is higher than that of the central and western regions, but the distribution of resources in the central part of the country is not much superior to that of the western region.) Food, petroleum, transportation, communications and electronic manufacturing have a great impact on the national economy. And it is the main source of mismatch. Especially, the productivity of the latter two is obviously lower than that of other industries, and the misallocation of production factors has a significant negative impact on productivity. This paper provides new ideas and schemes for the rational improvement of industrial resource allocation among regions in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F424

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝呈陽;周海波;胡漢輝;;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移中要素資源的空間錯(cuò)配與經(jīng)濟(jì)效率損失:基于江蘇傳統(tǒng)企業(yè)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年12期

2 韓劍;鄭秋玲;;政府干預(yù)如何導(dǎo)致地區(qū)資源錯(cuò)配——基于行業(yè)內(nèi)和行業(yè)間錯(cuò)配的分解[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年11期

3 樓東瑋;;資源錯(cuò)配視角下的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)失衡研究——關(guān)于錯(cuò)配指數(shù)的測度與分解[J];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

4 吳利華;申振佳;;產(chǎn)業(yè)生產(chǎn)率變化:企業(yè)進(jìn)入退出、所有制與政府補(bǔ)貼——以裝備制造業(yè)為例[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年04期

5 張佩;;中國工業(yè)部門的行業(yè)間資源錯(cuò)配研究[J];投資研究;2013年06期

6 龔關(guān);胡關(guān)亮;;中國制造業(yè)資源配置效率與全要素生產(chǎn)率[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年04期

7 周黎安;趙鷹妍;李力雄;;資源錯(cuò)配與政治周期[J];金融研究;2013年03期

8 楊振;陳甬軍;;中國制造業(yè)資源誤置及福利損失測度[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年03期

9 柏培文;;中國勞動(dòng)要素配置扭曲程度的測量[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年10期

10 曹玉書;樓東瑋;;資源錯(cuò)配、結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與中國經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1673945