本文關(guān)鍵詞：低碳視角下環(huán)境規(guī)制對我國制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的時空影響分析　出處：《東南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 環(huán)境規(guī)制 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新 空間杜賓模型 地理閾值 人力資本門檻

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,我國逐漸步入工業(yè)化中后期,龐大的人口消費(fèi)與投資要求經(jīng)濟(jì)增長保持穩(wěn)定的增幅,而維持經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的高能源消耗以及由此導(dǎo)致的高污染現(xiàn)象又使得經(jīng)濟(jì)增長出現(xiàn)不可持續(xù)的危機(jī)。研究如何破解中高經(jīng)濟(jì)增速與環(huán)境有效規(guī)制并行的難題,具有普遍的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和理論價值。波特假說提出了環(huán)境有效規(guī)制下技術(shù)創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的可能性,作為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的內(nèi)核,技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能夠顯著推進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)保持增幅。由此,本文基于波特假說展開,討論環(huán)境規(guī)制與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的協(xié)調(diào)關(guān)系。首先利用基于超越對數(shù)生產(chǎn)函數(shù)的隨機(jī)前沿模型測度了我國31個省域2003-2010年的技術(shù)效率和技術(shù)進(jìn)步值,并借助于探索性空間數(shù)據(jù)分析方法(ESDA)分析了技術(shù)效率和技術(shù)進(jìn)步值的空間相關(guān)性及其地理距離特征。與此同時,通過整理年鑒數(shù)據(jù)收集了我國31個省域2003-2010年的命令控制型環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度和市場型環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度,同樣利用探索性空間數(shù)據(jù)分析方法(ESDA)分析了命令控制型環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度與市場型環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的空間相關(guān)性及其地理距離特征。借助于數(shù)理模型在波特假說的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行了理論延伸和假設(shè)提出之后,本文基于多種效應(yīng)的空間杜賓模型從形式、強(qiáng)度及空間的視角出發(fā),對波特假說及其延伸假設(shè)進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析和穩(wěn)健性檢驗(yàn),并且對波特假說及其延伸假設(shè)成立的人力資本門檻進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究。進(jìn)一步地控制時期差異和地區(qū)差異的拓展性討論也在文中給出。結(jié)論主要表明,波特假說得到了來自中國數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證支持,但是不同形式環(huán)境規(guī)制對不同類型技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響效應(yīng)存在顯著差異,這種差異也反應(yīng)在控制時期差異和地區(qū)差異的實(shí)證分析中。其中,是否考慮空間效應(yīng)對結(jié)論有顯著影響。最后,結(jié)合研究結(jié)論,給出了一些針對環(huán)境規(guī)制形式、環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度、市場一體化、教育保障改革等方面的政策建議,以促進(jìn)環(huán)境規(guī)制與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新實(shí)現(xiàn)雙贏。
[Abstract]:At present, China is stepping into the middle and later stage of industrialization. The huge population consumption and investment demand stable growth of economic growth, while the high energy consumption and the high pollution caused by economic growth make the economic growth unsustainable. It is of universal practical significance and theoretical value to study the problem of how to solve the parallel problem of the medium and high economic growth and environmental effective regulation. Potter hypothesis put forward the possibility of technological innovation under the effective regulation of environment. As the core of economic development, technological innovation can significantly promote economic growth. Therefore, based on the Potter hypothesis, this paper discusses the coordination relationship between environmental regulation and technological innovation. Firstly, based on the stochastic frontier model to measure the translog production function of China's 31 provinces 2003-2010 years of technical efficiency and technical progress, and with the help of exploratory spatial data analysis method (ESDA) to analyze the spatial correlation and geographical distance characteristics of technical efficiency and technical progress value. At the same time, through the collation of data collection yearbook of China's 31 provincial 2003-2010 command control environmental regulation intensity and the market environmental regulation strength, also using exploratory spatial data analysis method (ESDA) analysis of the spatial correlation and geographical distance characteristics of command control environmental regulation intensity and market environmental regulation intensity. Based on the mathematical model of the theoretical extension and hypothesis based on Potter hypothesis after the various effects of the spatial Durbin model based on the form, intensity and spatial perspective, the empirical analysis and robustness test on Potter hypothesis and its extension hypothesis, and the Potter hypothesis and the extension of the hypothesis of human capital threshold the empirical research. Further discussions on the further control of the period differences and regional differences are also given in the article. The conclusion shows that the Potter hypothesis is supported by data from China, but there are significant differences in the effect of different forms of environmental regulation on different types of technological innovation. This difference is also reflected in the empirical analysis of differences in control time and regional differences. Whether or not the spatial effect is considered to have a significant impact on the conclusion. Finally, combined with the research findings, we give some policy recommendations for environmental regulation, environmental regulation intensity, market integration and educational security reform, so as to achieve win-win for environmental regulation and technological innovation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F424.3
，

本文編號：1342581