本文選題：族群　切入點(diǎn)：原生論　出處：《西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：人類學(xué)對于族群的研究,歷來被分為"原生論"與"建構(gòu)論"兩派�？R洛夫(John L.Comaroff)提出將族群視為分類的觀點(diǎn),超越了原生論與建構(gòu)論的二分,為理解族群問題提供了新的視角。在梳理并評述卡馬洛夫觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,本文試圖呈現(xiàn)一個(gè)反向的案例,即云南迪慶藏族自治州。在這里,族群并沒有成為人與人之間首要的分類體系,多個(gè)族群在地域的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合為了相互聯(lián)結(jié)的共同體。迪慶的案例,促使我們重新思考"族群"與"民族"概念,并尋找在民族地區(qū)從事研究的新方法。筆者認(rèn)為,費(fèi)孝通先生當(dāng)年提倡的社區(qū)研究,在今天的民族地區(qū)或許仍舊大有可為。
[Abstract]:Anthropology's study of ethnic groups has always been divided into two schools: "nativism" and "constructivism". The author, John L. Comaroff, puts forward the idea that ethnic groups are regarded as categories, which transcends the dichotomy between primordialism and constructivism. On the basis of combing and commenting on Kamarov's viewpoint, this paper attempts to present a reverse case, namely Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan. Ethnic groups have not become the primary system of classification between people. Many ethnic groups have been combined on a geographical basis to form an interconnected community. Diqing's case has prompted us to rethink the concepts of "ethnic group" and "nation". The author thinks that the community study advocated by Mr. Fei Xiaotong at that time may still be promising in the minority areas today.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學(xué)人類學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目“西部地區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中的文化格局變遷:‘藏彝走廊’多個(gè)地點(diǎn)的歷史、人文區(qū)位學(xué)考察”(14JJD840005)階段性成果
【分類號】：C912.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張超;;從認(rèn)知研究視角看族群邊界理論:原生論與場景論的一種融合路徑[J];廣西民族研究;2014年02期

，

本文編號：1563103