本文關(guān)鍵詞： 資本 場(chǎng)域 仫佬族文化 文化再生產(chǎn) 組織制度　出處：《吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2014年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：仫佬族文化在學(xué)校、家庭、社會(huì)場(chǎng)域中的傳承效果存在顯著差異。不同場(chǎng)域中的文化傳承行動(dòng)者掌握的資本類型、數(shù)量、結(jié)構(gòu)不同,獲取利益分配的機(jī)會(huì)有失公正,并受各自場(chǎng)域中固有慣習(xí)的束縛。仫佬族文化傳承困境的突破,重在仫佬族文化資源向文化資本、經(jīng)濟(jì)資本、社會(huì)資本、象征性資本成功轉(zhuǎn)型,構(gòu)建具有生產(chǎn)性、公益性、可持續(xù)性特征的文化再生產(chǎn)機(jī)制,秉承符合組織制度、社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)與資本建構(gòu)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的合法性邏輯。
[Abstract]:There are significant differences in the effect of Mulao culture inheritance in school, family and social field. The capital types, quantity and structure of cultural inheritance actors in different fields are different, and the opportunities to obtain benefit distribution are unfair. The breakthrough of Mulao nationality's cultural inheritance dilemma focuses on the successful transformation of Mulao's cultural resources into cultural capital, economic capital, social capital and symbolic capital, and the construction of Mulao nationality is productive and public welfare. The mechanism of cultural reproduction with sustainable characteristics follows the legitimacy logic of harmonious development of social network and capital construction in accordance with the organizational system social network and capital construction.
【作者單位】： 河池學(xué)院教師教育學(xué)院;
【基金】：全國(guó)教育規(guī)劃課題(FMB110045) 國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(12BMZ034)
【分類號(hào)】：K892.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 陳燕谷;文化資本[J];讀書(shū);1995年06期

2 金生，

本文編號(hào)：1500849