八段錦訓練對非小細胞肺癌術后康復期患者的影響研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-10 21:26
【摘要】：目的:1.對NSCLC術后康復期患者實施八段錦訓練,并與對照組比較,探討八段錦訓練對患者焦慮、抑郁情緒,運動耐量,生存質量的影響,以探索出能促進NSCLC術后患者康復的有效方法;2.總結經(jīng)驗,為癌癥康復提供相關參考依據(jù)。方法:1.選取KPS功能狀態(tài)評分表評分80-100分,ECOG體力狀態(tài)評分表評分0-1分的NSCLC術后康復期患者66例作為研究對象,按隨機數(shù)字表法將患者分為干預組、對照組各33例,干預組按本研究制定的八段錦運動方案訓練12周,對照組進行常規(guī)護理。2.干預前對兩組患者一般資料進行均衡性檢驗,干預前后對兩組患者焦慮自評量表、抑郁自評量表、FACT-L4.0生存質量量表各領域及總分、6MWD及每次6MWD測量后患者即刻SpO2、PR、Borg呼吸困難評分進行測評,評估干預效果。3.采用SPSS20.0統(tǒng)計分析軟件包,對不同類型的數(shù)據(jù)分別采用描述性統(tǒng)計分析,t檢驗(包括獨立樣本t檢驗和配對樣本t檢驗),Wilcoxon秩和檢驗,χ2檢驗。結果:1.最終,干預組、對照組各30例完成研究。兩組患者一般資料比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),表明兩組患者基線資料均衡可比。2.干預前,兩組患者SAS、SDS得分進行基線比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),兩組患者焦慮、抑郁水平均衡可比。實施八段錦干預后,兩組患者SAS、SDS得分比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),干預組焦慮、抑郁得分低于對照組。八段錦干預后,干預組SAS、SDS得分較干預前均降低,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),對照組SAS得分較干預前略有降低,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。3.干預前兩組患者FACT-L4.0量表中,生理狀況、社會/家庭狀況、情感狀況、功能狀況、附加關注情況、量表總分進行基線比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),兩組均衡可比。實施八段錦干預后,干預組生理狀況、情感狀況、功能狀況、量表總分高于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),社會/家庭狀況、附加功能狀況兩項得分與對照組比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。干預組干預后生理狀況、情感狀況、功能狀況、附加關注及量表總分較干預前增高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),社會/家庭狀況得分較干預前比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。對照組干預后情感狀況得分較干預前有所增高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。4.干預前,兩組患者6MWD及6MWD測評后患者即刻SpO2、PR、Borg呼吸困難評分比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),兩組均衡可比。實施八段錦干預后,兩組患者6MWD得分比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),6MWD得分干預組較對照組高,而6MWD測評后患者即刻SpO2、PR、Borg呼吸困難評分兩組比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。干預組干預后6MWD得分較干預前增高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),而6MWD測評后患者即刻SpO2、PR、Borg呼吸困難評分較干預前雖有改善,但差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結論:1.八段錦訓練能降低NSCLC術后康復期患者焦慮、抑郁情緒,改善患者運動耐量及生存質量。2.八段錦應用于NSCLC術后康復期患者的有效性,為該法應用于癌癥康復提供了依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. To explore the effect of Baduanjin training on anxiety, depression, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with NSCLC after operation. 2. To summarize experience and provide relevant reference for cancer rehabilitation. Methods: 1. Select KP. Sixty-six NSCLC patients were divided into intervention group and control group according to random number table. The intervention group was trained for 12 weeks according to the Baduanjin exercise program and the control group was given routine nursing. 2. The general data of the two groups were tested by equilibrium test. The scores of anxiety self-rating scale, self-rating depression scale, FACT-L4.0 quality of life scale, 6 MWD and SpO2, PR, Borg dyspnea score were measured immediately after each 6 MWD measurement. 3. The intervention effect was evaluated by SPSS20.0 statistical analysis software package. Descriptive statistical analysis, t test (including independent sample t test and paired sample t test), Wilcoxon rank sum test and_2 test were used for different types of data. Results: 1. Finally, 30 patients in the intervention group and 30 in the control group completed the study. Before intervention, there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups at baseline (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of SAS and SDS were significantly different between the two groups (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of anxiety and depression in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. The scores of SAS and SDS in the two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). The scores of SAS in the control group were slightly lower than those before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of physiological status, emotional status, functional status and total scale of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the scores of social/family status and additional functional status (P 0.05). After intervention, the scores of physiological status, emotional status, functional status, additional attention and the total score of the scale were significantly higher than before intervention (P 0.05). The scores of social/family status were not statistically significant (P 0.05). The scores of emotional status in the control group were higher than those before intervention (P 0.05). 4. Before intervention, there was no significant difference in SpO2, PR and Borg dyspnea scores between the two groups immediately after 6MWD and 6MWD (P 0.05), and the balance between the two groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in Borg dyspnea score between the two groups (P It can reduce the anxiety and depression of patients after NSCLC, improve their exercise tolerance and quality of life. 2. The effectiveness of Baduanjin in the rehabilitation of patients after NSCLC provides a basis for the application of this method in cancer rehabilitation.
【學位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R473.73
本文編號：2235658
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. To explore the effect of Baduanjin training on anxiety, depression, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with NSCLC after operation. 2. To summarize experience and provide relevant reference for cancer rehabilitation. Methods: 1. Select KP. Sixty-six NSCLC patients were divided into intervention group and control group according to random number table. The intervention group was trained for 12 weeks according to the Baduanjin exercise program and the control group was given routine nursing. 2. The general data of the two groups were tested by equilibrium test. The scores of anxiety self-rating scale, self-rating depression scale, FACT-L4.0 quality of life scale, 6 MWD and SpO2, PR, Borg dyspnea score were measured immediately after each 6 MWD measurement. 3. The intervention effect was evaluated by SPSS20.0 statistical analysis software package. Descriptive statistical analysis, t test (including independent sample t test and paired sample t test), Wilcoxon rank sum test and_2 test were used for different types of data. Results: 1. Finally, 30 patients in the intervention group and 30 in the control group completed the study. Before intervention, there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups at baseline (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of SAS and SDS were significantly different between the two groups (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of anxiety and depression in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. The scores of SAS and SDS in the two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). The scores of SAS in the control group were slightly lower than those before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). After Baduanjin intervention, the scores of physiological status, emotional status, functional status and total scale of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the scores of social/family status and additional functional status (P 0.05). After intervention, the scores of physiological status, emotional status, functional status, additional attention and the total score of the scale were significantly higher than before intervention (P 0.05). The scores of social/family status were not statistically significant (P 0.05). The scores of emotional status in the control group were higher than those before intervention (P 0.05). 4. Before intervention, there was no significant difference in SpO2, PR and Borg dyspnea scores between the two groups immediately after 6MWD and 6MWD (P 0.05), and the balance between the two groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in Borg dyspnea score between the two groups (P It can reduce the anxiety and depression of patients after NSCLC, improve their exercise tolerance and quality of life. 2. The effectiveness of Baduanjin in the rehabilitation of patients after NSCLC provides a basis for the application of this method in cancer rehabilitation.
【學位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R473.73
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 付金鈺;唐銳;李曉娟;田雪梅;;八段錦聯(lián)合五勞七損方對強直性脊柱炎患者軀體功能及心理健康狀況的影響[J];西部中醫(yī)藥;2016年06期
2 張惠玲;郭秀君;陳寧;曹叢;嚴鑫;;八段錦對慢性阻塞性肺疾病穩(wěn)定期病人生活質量的影響[J];護理研究;2016年16期
3 王一帆;高科;沈晨;車國衛(wèi);;術前肺康復運動訓練在肺癌患者中的應用現(xiàn)狀[J];中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志;2016年01期
4 宋瑞雯;張麗萍;湯久慧;韓美佳;;“健身氣功八段錦”調節(jié)心身的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];內(nèi)蒙古中醫(yī)藥;2015年07期
5 劉冰;朱云;黃順;王焱;;中醫(yī)八段錦操對抗擊埃博拉病毒國際醫(yī)療隊員身心狀況的影響[J];護理研究;2015年21期
6 曾華志;劉洪濤;羅細玲;胡秋桂;董清華;陶曙;馬志明;;肺康復訓練對肺結核結構性肺病患者肺功能及生活質量的影響[J];護理學雜志;2015年09期
7 夏本英;楊躍紅;龍玉珠;邱煒;;八段錦訓練操對塵肺康復的作用[J];職業(yè)與健康;2015年02期
8 丁晉梅;;心理護理干預對晚期非小細胞肺癌化療患者生活質量的影響[J];中國醫(yī)藥科學;2015年01期
9 方春平;朱章志;江慧玲;王大偉;王琳;劉步平;;健身氣功八段錦對糖耐量低減患者心理健康的影響[J];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學學報;2014年05期
10 李秀云;胡偉;張正華;尚波;;綜合肺康復對塵肺患者呼吸功能的療效觀察[J];中國康復;2014年02期
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 韓睿;傳統(tǒng)中醫(yī)運動八段錦對非小細胞肺癌術后患者干預的療效觀察[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學;2015年
2 孔輕輕;肺康復訓練對肺癌術后化療患者生活質量及癌因性疲乏的影響[D];天津醫(yī)科大學;2014年
，本文編號：2235658
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/linchuangyixuelunwen/2235658.html
最近更新
教材專著
