本文選題：護理干預 + 化療��； 參考：《基因組學與應用生物學》2017年05期

【摘要】：本研究將88例接受化療的腫瘤患者根據(jù)隨機數(shù)字表分為兩組,其中,對照組予以常規(guī)護理,觀察組予以護理干預。對比兩組干預后的消化道毒性反應發(fā)生情況、癥狀積分、生活質量及護理滿意度之后,發(fā)現(xiàn)兩組在消化道毒性反應的發(fā)生情況及癥狀積分方面有差異,觀察組的不良反應發(fā)病率及癥狀積分低于對照組(p0.05)。兩組干預后的SCL-90量表在軀體化、抑郁、恐懼、敵對和焦慮等5個方面的得分均有差異,觀察組低于對照組(p0.05)。觀察組滿意度為90.91%,對照組滿意度為75.00%,兩組在對護理工作的滿意度方面有差異,觀察組高于對照組(p0.05)。
[Abstract]:In this study 88 cancer patients received chemotherapy were divided into two groups according to random number table. The control group was given routine nursing and the observation group was given nursing intervention. After comparing the incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity, symptom score, quality of life and nursing satisfaction between the two groups, it was found that there were differences in the occurrence and symptom score of digestive tract toxicity between the two groups. The incidence and symptom score of adverse reactions in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (p 0.05). The scores of SCL-90 in somatization, depression, fear, hostility and anxiety were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (p0.05). The satisfaction degree of the observation group was 90.91 and that of the control group was 75.00. There was a difference between the two groups in the satisfaction of nursing work, which was higher in the observation group than in the control group (p0.05).
【作者單位】： 樂山職業(yè)技術學院;
【基金】：樂山職業(yè)技術學院提供項目資助
【分類號】：R473.73

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 魯敏;;鹽酸利多卡因注射液引起嚴重毒性反應1例的護理[J];解放軍護理雜志;2007年01期

2 王奎書;;化療患者嚴重毒性反應的基礎護理研究[J];中國現(xiàn)代醫(yī)生;2008年01期

3 楊鳳彬,張曉影,何向慧;洋地黃毒性反應的觀察及護理體會[J];黑龍江醫(yī)學;1999年07期

4 王玲;;化療毒性反應的心理負反應及護理方法[J];中國城鄉(xiāng)企業(yè)衛(wèi)生;2007年01期

5 鄧顏好,陳招梅,梁滿琴,吳燕萍;晚期鼻咽癌患者同步放化療毒性反應的臨床觀察[J];南方護理學報;2003年02期

6 王莉;韓春紅;于忠和;李紅英;;參芪十一味顆粒減輕化療毒性反應的臨床觀察[J];中國臨床醫(yī)生;2011年05期

7 陳益 ,段天紅;給病人進行免疫治療時護士應注意神經(jīng)精神毒性反應[J];國外醫(yī)學.護理學分冊;1994年04期

8 梁欣,梁梅,趙建琴,呂傳艾,侯慶珍;晚期食管癌病人同步放化療毒性反應的護理[J];護理學雜志;2004年11期

9 黃筠;中藥對化療毒性反應的防治與體會[J];江西中醫(yī)學院學報;1997年02期

10 黎容清,，

本文編號：2079777