【摘要】：量子自殺實驗是在多世界解釋假設的基礎上導出的一個思想實驗,被認為是對量子多世界解釋和傳統(tǒng)解釋的一個判決性實驗。對于該實驗的爭議主要集中在如何定義分支、如何定義概率及被實驗者如何選擇自己的立場等三個方面。其中分支問題為多世界解釋本身的問題;后兩個問題爭論的根源在于,沒有意識到多世界解釋中的分支世界并非可能世界,而是必然發(fā)生的平行世界,其核心涉及概率的重新定義和意識的同一性問題。該實驗不僅無法驗證多世界解釋,反而暴露了多世界解釋在驗證問題、概率問題、信任問題中存在的問題和矛盾。
[Abstract]:The quantum suicide experiment is a thought experiment derived from the hypothesis of multi world interpretation. It is considered as a verdict experiment on the quantum multi world interpretation and traditional interpretation. The controversy about the experiment is mainly focused on how to define the branch, how to define the probability and how the experimenter chooses its own position, and so on. The issue of the middle branch is the problem of the multi world interpretation itself; the root of the debate on the latter two is that it is not realized that the branch world in the multi world interpretation is not the possible world, but the inevitable parallel world. Its core involves the redefinition of probability and the identity of the consciousness. The experiment is not only unable to verify the multi world interpretation, but it is not the same. It exposes the problems and contradictions existing in many world interpretations in proving problems, probability problems and trust problems.
【作者單位】： 山西大學區(qū)域科技政策研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地重大招標資助項目(15JJD720011) 山西省“青年三晉學者”支持計劃資助項目
【分類號】：O413.1
，

本文編號：2139271