本文選題：飯島忠夫　切入點：中國天文學史　出處：《自然辯證法研究》2017年08期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：通過對飯島忠夫(1874-1954)其人其學的梳理和分析,探討了他以《支那古代史論》為代表作的"疑古"論中的部分合理性及大量錯謬之處。在《支那古代史論》中,飯島從多個視角對中國古代天文學性質(zhì)進行了重新分析,突出了其本有的星占與政治屬性。同時,飯島對《春秋》、《左傳》等儒家經(jīng)典中天文記錄所存在的矛盾與問題進行了發(fā)掘和整理,通過對原有思路的逆向運用揭示出記載本身的不自洽,在客觀上發(fā)展了天文歷史年代學。但是,飯島的治學具有兩面性,存在強烈的政治動機。其"疑古"論在前提假設(shè)、古籍釋讀、推理方法三方面存在學理缺陷,因此其"中國古代天文學西來說"是立不住腳的�？v觀飯島的學術(shù)生涯,其"疑古"論實質(zhì)在于改造儒教和追求真理,目標是"加強儒教在日本精神文化中的基礎(chǔ)地位"。而今回顧以飯島忠夫為代表的科技史"疑古"思潮,其主要意義在于改造了日本的尚古思維定式以及學術(shù)范式的現(xiàn)代化。
[Abstract]:By combing and analyzing his studies, this paper discusses the rationality and errors in the theory of "doubt of the Ancient", which is represented by **. In ** 's Theory of Ancient History, there are a lot of errors in the theory of the ancient history of **. Fandao reanalyzed the nature of ancient Chinese astronomy from several perspectives, highlighting its original astrological and political attributes. Rice Island excavates and arranges the contradictions and problems existing in the astronomical records in the Confucian classics, such as Spring and Autumn period, Zuo Zhuan, and so on. Through the reverse application of the original ideas, it reveals the inconsistency of the records themselves. Objectively, the chronology of astronomical history has been developed. However, the study of Fan Dao has two sides and has strong political motive. Its theory of "doubt of ancient times" has theoretical defects in three aspects: premise hypothesis, interpretation of ancient books, and reasoning method. Therefore, his theory of "ancient Chinese astronomy" cannot stand still. Throughout his academic career, the essence of his theory of "doubt of ancient times" lies in the transformation of Confucianism and the pursuit of truth. The aim is to "strengthen the basic position of Confucianism in Japanese spiritual culture". The main significance of the review of the trend of thought in the history of science and technology, represented by Takeshi Oshima, lies in the transformation of Japanese ancient thinking patterns and the modernization of academic paradigms.
【作者單位】： 南京信息工程大學科學技術(shù)史研究院;
【基金】：江蘇省基礎(chǔ)研究計劃(自然科學基金)項目“京都大學的中國天文學史學派研究”(批準號:BK20170937)
【分類號】：P1-09
，

本文編號：1646287