【摘要】：默示許可理論是傳統(tǒng)民法中的一項(xiàng)基本理論，在被引入著作權(quán)法的過(guò)程中發(fā)展出了自身的特性。著作權(quán)默示許可作為侵權(quán)抗辯的事由之一，有助于平衡各方主體之間的利益關(guān)系，在解決著作權(quán)糾紛中扮演著重要的角色。網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展破壞了原有的利益平衡狀態(tài)，作為利益平衡的工具之一，默示許可理論在解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)糾紛中發(fā)揮著越來(lái)越重要的作用。然而，，我國(guó)對(duì)著作權(quán)默示許可的理論研究較為匱乏，司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足。因此，本文主要研究默示許可理論在著作權(quán)法中的存在基礎(chǔ)和適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題，并選取網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中出現(xiàn)的典型問(wèn)題，分析其能否成立默示許可，以期對(duì)著作權(quán)默示許可理論在我國(guó)的發(fā)展有所幫助。 本文除導(dǎo)言、結(jié)論外共分四個(gè)部分： 第一章是探討了默示許可的理論基礎(chǔ)。本章首先從默示許可的民法理論基礎(chǔ)入手，論述了默示許可理論在民法中的發(fā)展情況；接著探討了默示許可理論在著作權(quán)法中的起源及存在基礎(chǔ)，并總結(jié)歸納出了著作權(quán)默示許可的三因素適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；在此基礎(chǔ)上討論默示許可理論在網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)糾紛中的運(yùn)用，為后文對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)糾紛的個(gè)案分析做鋪墊。 第二章對(duì)搜索引擎提供的搜索服務(wù)能否適用默示許可進(jìn)行了分析。本章首先介紹了搜索引擎提供搜索服務(wù)的技術(shù)原理，并從中總結(jié)出搜索引擎提供服務(wù)過(guò)程中所涉及的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題；隨后對(duì)上述問(wèn)題能否適用默示許可理論予以解決進(jìn)行了分析；最后在上述分析的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)我國(guó)今后如何處理司法實(shí)踐中涉及到的搜索引擎問(wèn)題提出了建議。 第三章是對(duì)著作權(quán)默示許可理論能否適用于數(shù)字圖書(shū)館問(wèn)題的研究。本章內(nèi)容在明確了數(shù)字圖書(shū)館定義和特點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上，分析數(shù)字圖書(shū)館運(yùn)作過(guò)程中可能涉及的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題；并運(yùn)用第一章中所總結(jié)的默示許可的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)，判斷數(shù)字圖書(shū)館能否獲得默示許可；最后嘗試對(duì)數(shù)字圖書(shū)館未來(lái)的發(fā)展模式提出適當(dāng)可行的建議。 第四章探討的是博文轉(zhuǎn)載行為能否適用默示許可的問(wèn)題。本章從博文轉(zhuǎn)載的含義出發(fā)，厘清了博文轉(zhuǎn)載過(guò)程中所涉及的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題；并通過(guò)三因素適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的分析，判斷著作權(quán)默示許可能否適用于博文轉(zhuǎn)載的情形；最后由博文轉(zhuǎn)載行為進(jìn)行延伸，探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)載行為能否適用默示許可。
[Abstract]:The implied license theory is a basic theory in the traditional civil law, which has developed its own characteristics in the process of being introduced into the copyright law. As one of the reasons of tort defense, implied license of copyright plays an important role in the settlement of copyright disputes. The development of network technology has destroyed the original state of interest balance. As one of the tools of interest balance, implied license theory plays an increasingly important role in resolving network copyright disputes. However, the theoretical research on implied license of copyright in our country is relatively scarce and judicial practice experience is insufficient. Therefore, this paper mainly studies the existence basis and applicable standard of implied license theory in copyright law, and selects the typical problems in the network environment, and analyzes whether the implied license can be established or not. In order to help the development of copyright implied license theory in our country. In addition to the introduction, the conclusion is divided into four parts: the first chapter discusses the theoretical basis of implied license. This chapter firstly discusses the development of implied license theory in civil law, and then discusses the origin and existence basis of implied license theory in copyright law. And summed up the three factors of copyright implied licensing applicable standards; on this basis discusses the implied licensing theory in the network copyright disputes the application of the following text for the network copyright disputes case analysis to do the groundwork. The second chapter analyzes whether the search service provided by search engine can be applied to implied license. This chapter first introduces the technical principle of search engine to provide search service, and summarizes the copyright problem involved in the process of search engine service, and then analyzes whether the theory of implied license can be applied to solve the above problems. Finally, on the basis of the above analysis, some suggestions on how to deal with the search engine problems in judicial practice in our country are put forward. The third chapter is the research on whether copyright implied license theory can be applied to digital library. Based on the definition and characteristics of the digital library, this chapter analyzes the copyright problems that may be involved in the operation of the digital library, and uses the applicable standards of implied license summarized in Chapter 1 to test the copyright issues involved in the operation of the digital library. Finally, this paper tries to put forward appropriate and feasible suggestions for the future development mode of digital library. The fourth chapter discusses whether the implied permission can be applied to the reprint behavior. This chapter starts from the meaning of the reprint of the blog text, clarifies the copyright problem involved in the process of reprint of the blog article, and judges whether the implied license of copyright can be applied to the situation of the reprint of the post through the analysis of the applicable standards of three factors. Finally, by the extension of the reprint behavior, the article discusses whether the network reprint behavior can be applied to implied permission.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊圣坤;;合同法上的默示條款制度研究[J];北方法學(xué);2010年02期

2 王遷;;搜索引擎提供“快照”服務(wù)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];東方法學(xué);2010年03期

3 呂炳斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的版權(quán)默示許可制度——兩起Google案的分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

4 阮開(kāi)欣;;網(wǎng)頁(yè)快照著作權(quán)問(wèn)題探究——美國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐及借鑒[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年06期

5 梅術(shù)文;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)默示許可制度的不足與完善[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

6 孫晨鐘;論博客傳播方式的局限性[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 王宇紅;殷昕;;博客著作權(quán)法律問(wèn)題評(píng)析[J];圖書(shū)館理論與實(shí)踐;2009年05期

8 王棟;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)搜索服務(wù)的默示許可制度研究[J];民辦教育研究;2010年02期

9 劉雪娜;陳朝;;我國(guó)數(shù)字資源產(chǎn)業(yè)化發(fā)展研究[J];情報(bào)科學(xué);2006年08期

10 陳敏;Internet時(shí)代的數(shù)字圖書(shū)館建設(shè)[J];情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 董正偉;Google數(shù)字圖書(shū)館所引發(fā)的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題思考[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 徐珊;從博客看網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代版權(quán)權(quán)利的擴(kuò)張和限制[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2207643