【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)是傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的延伸。隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及,網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展對(duì)著作權(quán)的影響?yīng)q如一枚硬幣,一面促進(jìn)知識(shí)的傳播,一面又沖擊現(xiàn)有的保護(hù)體系。近幾年在我國(guó)興起的網(wǎng)絡(luò)小說(shuō)熱不僅催生了不計(jì)其數(shù)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)職業(yè)寫(xiě)手,并且有人憑借其過(guò)人的頭腦和出眾的文采一夜成名,而且為網(wǎng)絡(luò)文學(xué)市場(chǎng)帶來(lái)了巨大的利潤(rùn)空間。與此同時(shí),網(wǎng)絡(luò)盜版作品的泛濫使網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象變得不足為奇。更糟糕的是,網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題的復(fù)雜性又給權(quán)利人的權(quán)利救濟(jì)增加了難度。因此,重構(gòu)著作權(quán)的保護(hù)體系已經(jīng)迫在眉睫。 在絕大多數(shù)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的案件中,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商都扮演了一種特殊的角色。百度作為全球最大的中文搜索引擎,在推動(dòng)我國(guó)的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展方面可謂是有目共睹。由于涉及的問(wèn)題較為復(fù)雜,盛大文學(xué)訴百度案一度被視為網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)類(lèi)侵權(quán)案件的典型而引起廣泛關(guān)注,百度也因此被推向風(fēng)口浪尖。筆者通過(guò)分析該案,對(duì)該案涉及的有關(guān)著作權(quán)之法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行解析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)方面的不足,并就此發(fā)表拙見(jiàn),旨在完善著作權(quán)保護(hù)體系,從而加強(qiáng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的保護(hù)力度。本文分四部分： 第一部分,對(duì)案情進(jìn)行回顧,介紹案件爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)與引發(fā)的法律問(wèn)題。 第二部分,對(duì)本案涉及的著作權(quán)相關(guān)內(nèi)容、網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的認(rèn)定以及責(zé)任的豁免進(jìn)行分析,并就存在的問(wèn)題提出筆者的主張。 第三部分,對(duì)本案的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)和引發(fā)的法律問(wèn)題予以定論。 第四部分,對(duì)完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的相關(guān)辦法提出淺見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:Network copyright is the extension of traditional copyright in the network environment. With the popularization of the Internet, the influence of the development of network technology on copyright is like a coin, which not only promotes the spread of knowledge, but also impinges on the existing protection system. In recent years, the popularity of network novels in our country has not only given birth to countless network professional writers, but also some people have become famous overnight with their superior minds and outstanding literary talent, and have brought huge profit space to the network literature market. At the same time, the proliferation of network pirated works makes the infringement of network copyright become unsurprising. To make matters worse, the complexity of network infringement makes it more difficult for right holders to remedy their rights. Therefore, it is urgent to reconstruct the copyright protection system. In the vast majority of network infringement cases, network service providers have played a special role. Baidu as the world's largest Chinese search engine, in promoting China's Internet development is obvious to all. Due to the complexity of the issues involved, Shanda Literature v. Baidu case was once regarded as a typical network copyright infringement case and caused widespread concern, and Baidu was pushed to the forefront. By analyzing the case, the author analyzes the legal problems involved in the case, and finds out the deficiencies in the protection of network copyright in our country, and puts forward some opinions on this, in order to perfect the copyright protection system. So as to strengthen the protection of network copyright. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part reviews the case, introduces the focus of the case dispute and legal issues. The second part analyzes the copyright related content of this case, the network copyright tort liability and the exemption of liability, and puts forward the author's opinion on the existing problems. The third part, the focus of the dispute and the legal issues caused by the conclusion. The fourth part, to perfect our country copyright protection related method puts forward the simple opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王遷;;發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)司法保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀與趨勢(shì)[J];法律適用;2009年12期

2 陳錦川;;關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的研究[J];法律適用;2011年06期

3 吳漢東;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的版權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)和版權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題[J];法人雜志;2009年01期

4 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

5 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

6 王遷;;《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》中“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的效力[J];法學(xué);2010年06期

7 吳漢東;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年02期

8 張新寶;任鴻雁;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上的侵權(quán)責(zé)任:《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條解讀[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

9 王遷;;“WAP搜索”及相關(guān)服務(wù)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 何悅;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2162420