【摘要】：倒虹吸管作為應(yīng)用廣泛的交叉工程和重要的隱蔽工程,在國(guó)際上素有生命線工程之稱,其結(jié)構(gòu)的應(yīng)力、變形與外形尺寸、填土厚度、填土性質(zhì)、初始邊界條件等因素之間存在著復(fù)雜的相互作用,而且除滿足正常輸水要求外,對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行合理的設(shè)計(jì)也十分必要。因此,為保證整個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)體系的穩(wěn)定、安全和經(jīng)濟(jì)性,對(duì)倒虹吸結(jié)構(gòu)和周圍土體進(jìn)行合理的分析和計(jì)算,進(jìn)而對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)就顯得尤為重要。本文基于數(shù)值模擬法,以黑龍江省依安農(nóng)場(chǎng)河北灌區(qū)主干渠穿西太平川溝倒虹吸工程為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)運(yùn)用有限元分析軟件ANSYS,首先對(duì)工程運(yùn)行中遇到的5種工況,采用鋼筋混凝土的整體式模式,建立原設(shè)計(jì)方案下的管身和周圍土體的三維實(shí)體模型,分別分析管身和周圍土體的應(yīng)力和變形。其次結(jié)合分析得到的管身應(yīng)力值,對(duì)倒虹吸的初始斷面及配筋進(jìn)行優(yōu)化,并利用分離式的配筋形式,對(duì)優(yōu)化后的倒虹吸管身進(jìn)行兩種較不利工況下的模擬分析,驗(yàn)證改進(jìn)后設(shè)計(jì)方案的可靠性,對(duì)比優(yōu)化前后的工程量和造價(jià),分析其經(jīng)濟(jì)性。本文的主要研究?jī)?nèi)容和結(jié)論如下:(1)介紹有限元的基本原理及分析過(guò)程、ANSYS的求解步驟,分別總結(jié)概括混凝土、鋼筋、土體三種材料的本構(gòu)關(guān)系和破壞準(zhǔn)則及鋼筋混凝土有限元分析中鋼筋的處理方式。(2)根據(jù)原設(shè)計(jì)方案中管身的有限元分析結(jié)果,可得出在工程運(yùn)行的5種工況中,管身混凝土最大拉、壓應(yīng)力均遠(yuǎn)未超過(guò)其設(shè)計(jì)值且有較大的富余,管身較不利工況出現(xiàn)在管內(nèi)無(wú)水的完建和檢修工況。(3)根據(jù)原設(shè)計(jì)方案中管身周圍土體的有限元分析結(jié)果,可得出在不同工況下,土體整體是穩(wěn)定的,最大沉降量發(fā)生在完建期,位于管身兩側(cè)回填土的自由表面處,其值為16.2 mm。管身整體沉降均勻,最大下沉量約為10.3 mm,滿足倒虹吸管對(duì)地基沉降量的設(shè)計(jì)要求。管身地基最大壓應(yīng)力值為114 k Pa,地基承載力較好,滿足本工程地基承載力的設(shè)計(jì)要求。(4)結(jié)合ANSYS數(shù)值模擬得到的洞身應(yīng)力值,對(duì)初始的倒虹吸結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì),根據(jù)改進(jìn)后結(jié)構(gòu)的有限元分析結(jié)果,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)優(yōu)化后的倒虹吸結(jié)構(gòu)是安全的。通過(guò)對(duì)比優(yōu)化前后的工程造價(jià),發(fā)現(xiàn)改進(jìn)后的設(shè)計(jì)方案可以使造價(jià)大幅降低。
[Abstract]:Inverted siphon, as a widely used cross-engineering and important concealed engineering, is known as lifeline engineering in the world. There are complex interactions among the stress, deformation and shape of the structure, fill thickness, fill properties, initial boundary conditions and other factors. Besides satisfying the normal water conveyance requirements, the structure is reasonable. Therefore, in order to ensure the stability, safety and economy of the whole structure system, it is very important to analyze and calculate the inverted siphon structure and surrounding soil reasonably, and then optimize the design of the structure. The inverted siphon ditch project is taken as the research object. Firstly, by using the finite element analysis software ANSYS, the three-dimensional solid model of the pipe body and the surrounding soil body under the original design scheme is established for the five working conditions encountered in the project operation. Then the stress and deformation of the pipe body and the surrounding soil body are analyzed respectively. The obtained stress value of the pipe body is used to optimize the initial section and reinforcement of the inverted siphon, and the optimized inverted siphon pipe body is simulated and analyzed under two unfavorable working conditions by using the separated reinforcement form. The reliability of the improved design scheme is verified, and the cost and quantity of the project before and after optimization are compared to analyze its economy. The research contents and conclusions are as follows: (1) Introduce the basic principle and analysis process of finite element method, and the solving steps of ANSYS, summarize the constitutive relation and failure criteria of concrete, steel bar and soil, and the treatment method of steel bar in the finite element analysis of reinforced concrete. (2) According to the finite element analysis results of pipe body in the original design scheme, It can be concluded that the maximum tensile and compressive stresses of the concrete in the pipe body are far from the design values and have greater redundancy in the five working conditions of the project. The unfavorable working conditions of the pipe body appear in the complete and maintenance conditions without water in the pipe. (3) According to the finite element analysis results of the soil around the pipe body in the original design, the soil integrity under different working conditions can be obtained. The maximum settlement occurs at the free surface of the backfill on both sides of the pipe body, and its value is 16.2 mm. The overall settlement of the pipe body is uniform. The maximum settlement is about 10.3 mm, which meets the design requirements of the inverted siphon for the settlement of the foundation. The design requirement of foundation bearing capacity. (4) Combining with the stress value of the cave body obtained by ANSYS numerical simulation, the initial inverted siphon structure is optimized. According to the finite element analysis results of the improved structure, it can be found that the optimized inverted siphon structure is safe. By comparing the engineering cost before and after optimization, it is found that the improved design scheme is feasible. So that the cost will be greatly reduced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TV672.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 路德春;王國(guó)盛;杜修力;;混凝土材料三維統(tǒng)一硬化/軟化彈塑性本構(gòu)模型[J];中國(guó)科學(xué):技術(shù)科學(xué);2016年08期

2 梁素偉;苗衛(wèi)明;汪健;;倒虹吸管回填土有限元分析[J];水利規(guī)劃與設(shè)計(jì);2015年02期

3 韋亞琳;;南水北調(diào)中線沙窩溝河道倒虹吸水力設(shè)計(jì)及模型試驗(yàn)研究[J];水利規(guī)劃與設(shè)計(jì);2014年12期

4 馬誠(chéng);陳惟珍;;預(yù)應(yīng)力混凝土空間組合式滑移模型[J];應(yīng)用力學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

5 張龍飛;姚賢華;岳超然;管俊峰;;溫度變化對(duì)大型預(yù)應(yīng)力混凝土倒虹吸結(jié)構(gòu)受力的影響[J];南水北調(diào)與水利科技;2013年04期

6 繆吉倫;王云莉;劉亞輝;;長(zhǎng)距離過(guò)江倒虹吸管道進(jìn)口摻氣及消渦措施研究[J];給水排水;2013年07期

7 李進(jìn)霞;張偉杰;張素香;;有限元法及應(yīng)用狀況[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報(bào);2012年31期

8 宋少云;尹芳;;有限元網(wǎng)格劃分中的圣維南原理及其應(yīng)用[J];機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)與制造;2012年08期

9 楊禧;;昆明掌鳩河引水供水工程岔河倒虹吸設(shè)計(jì)[J];水力發(fā)電;2010年10期

10 郭磊;汪倫焰;許慶偉;;倒虹吸管身冬季施工溫控仿真分析及應(yīng)用實(shí)例[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李朝紅;基于損傷斷裂理論的混凝土破壞行為研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2012年

2 黃吉峰;鋼筋混凝土結(jié)構(gòu)非線性有限元分析及有限單元構(gòu)造方法的研究[D];中國(guó)建筑科學(xué)研究院;2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 苗衛(wèi)明;南水北調(diào)肖河?xùn)|溝倒虹吸三維有限元分析[D];河北工程大學(xué);2014年

2 劉蒙娜;地下箱涵有限元結(jié)構(gòu)分析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2014年

3 胡志超;箱型鋼筋混凝土倒虹吸非線性有限元分析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2183155