考慮微觀GTN損傷模型的建筑鋼材力學(xué)性能研究
[Abstract]:The ductile failure of steel structural members is the main failure form, and the constitutive model considering microscopic damage can explain the ductile damage of ductile metal materials vividly from the microscopic level. It is reasonable to reveal the true development process of the nonlinear properties of steel. The most widely used microscopic damage model is GTN (Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman) model. However, the model has not been extended to the field of architecture. Therefore, the microscopic GTN damage model is introduced into the study of mechanical properties of building steel. Based on the microscopic GTN damage constitutive theory, the user material subroutine UMAT, in the finite element software ABAQUS is modulated. The validity and correctness of the program are verified by a numerical example, and the influence of damage parameters on the prediction results is systematically analyzed. After hot rolled seamless steel tubes made from Q345 low alloy steel and austenitic 304 stainless steel, smooth and notched specimens were processed. Uniaxial tensile failure tests of standard and notched specimens were carried out. The material parameters and damage parameters of two kinds of steels were identified, respectively. Compared with the numerical simulation results, it is found that the GTN damage model can accurately predict the fracture point of Q345 low alloy steel specimen, while the Ramberg-Osgood curve is used to simulate the stress-strain relationship of steel to construct the GTN damage model. The mechanical behavior of austenitic 304 stainless steel cannot be accurately simulated. The hysteresis and skeleton curves of Q345 low alloy steel and austenitic 304 stainless steel smooth and notched specimens under low cycle reciprocating loading are obtained. The results show that the mechanical properties of steel under monotonic and cyclic loads are quite different. In addition, the fracture morphology of two kinds of steel specimens under monotonic and cyclic loading was observed by scanning electron microscope test, and the difference between the fracture morphology of Q345 low alloy steel and austenitic 304 stainless steel was discussed. The failure characteristics of the same steel under different loading modes are proved to be consistent with the microscopic expression of the GTN constitutive model, which lays a foundation for further research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:TU511.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 董杰;李永池;陳學(xué)東;;微孔洞唯象損傷力學(xué)模型及其應(yīng)用[J];爆炸與沖擊;2008年05期
2 張揚(yáng);武振宇;;考慮損傷發(fā)展的鋼材混合強(qiáng)化本構(gòu)模型[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2011年02期
3 周儲偉,楊衛(wèi),方岱寧;金屬基復(fù)合材料的強(qiáng)度與損傷分析[J];固體力學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期
4 王國珍;張賀全;蒲吉斌;軒福貞;;GTN損傷模型對C-Mn鋼缺口拉伸試樣延性斷裂的預(yù)測[J];機(jī)械強(qiáng)度;2008年04期
5 范峰;聶桂波;支旭東;;三向荷載作用下圓鋼管材料本構(gòu)模型研究[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu)學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期
6 董寶,沈祖炎;空間鋼構(gòu)件考慮損傷累積效應(yīng)的恢復(fù)力模型及試驗(yàn)驗(yàn)證[J];上海力學(xué);1999年04期
7 范峰;聶桂波;支旭東;沈世釗;;圓鋼管空間滯回試驗(yàn)及材料本構(gòu)模型[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年12期
8 徐龍河;楊冬玲;李忠獻(xiàn);;基于應(yīng)變和比能雙控的鋼結(jié)構(gòu)損傷模型[J];振動與沖擊;2011年07期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 吳德飛;鋼結(jié)構(gòu)損傷累積至斷裂及損傷負(fù)向激勵的長期效應(yīng)[D];浙江大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號:2370967
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2370967.html