【摘要】：中國歷經(jīng)30多年的改革開放，國民經(jīng)濟(jì)得到了長足的發(fā)展，建筑業(yè)已成為國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè)。在此過程中，中國的建筑行業(yè)發(fā)生了一系列重大的變革，積累了大量的經(jīng)驗，特別在建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量管理方面，已形成了一套適應(yīng)于社會主義發(fā)展模式，同時具有鮮明東方特色的，全過程、多維度監(jiān)控的質(zhì)量管理模式。越南的改革開放在時序上較中國為遲。建筑業(yè)作為國民經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的先導(dǎo)行業(yè)，目前在越南的整體發(fā)展水平較之為滯后，工程質(zhì)量水平較低，質(zhì)量事故時有發(fā)生，直接危害到人民群眾的生命、財產(chǎn)安全；同時，也影響了國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)步發(fā)展，阻礙區(qū)域競爭能力的提高。鑒于中國與越南在國家政治體制上相同，在文化傳統(tǒng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式相類似，，兩國在建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量管理方面所取得的經(jīng)驗與成就值得越南研究和借鑒。 本論文中試圖通過實施層面（限基層政府層面）的中越兩國建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理模式的對比分析，研究越南建筑行業(yè)質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及戰(zhàn)略定位，剖析其目前的特色與存在的問題；借鑒中國基層政府以往在建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理實踐過程中的經(jīng)驗與成就，提出越南基層政府建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理模式的改革建議。 首先，對中越兩國建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理現(xiàn)狀及戰(zhàn)略定位進(jìn)行剖析，詳細(xì)闡述各自管理機(jī)構(gòu)、管理體制、管理機(jī)制等方面的現(xiàn)狀，系統(tǒng)介紹中國基層政府的建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理模式，深入分析越南建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理當(dāng)前的特點(diǎn)與存在的問題。 然后，設(shè)計統(tǒng)一的調(diào)查問卷，分別進(jìn)行中越兩國基層政府建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理實施現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查。通過對調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計分析，闡述中越兩國基層政府各自建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理模式對建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量影響的方式及實效；通過比對分析，揭示中越兩國基層政府建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量進(jìn)行監(jiān)督管理上的異同之所在。 最后，總結(jié)中國基層政府在以往建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理實踐過程中的成就和經(jīng)驗，并據(jù)此提出越南基層政府建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理模式的改革措施，以提高越南建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理水平。
[Abstract]:After more than 30 years of reform and opening up, the national economy has been greatly developed, and the construction industry has become the pillar industry of the national economy. In this process, China's construction industry has undergone a series of major changes, accumulated a lot of experience, especially in the construction project quality management, has formed a set of suitable for the socialist development model. At the same time, there is a distinct Oriental characteristics, the whole process, multi-dimensional monitoring quality management model. Vietnam's reform and opening up in time series is later than China. As the leading industry in the development of the national economy, the overall development level of the construction industry in Vietnam is lagging behind, the level of engineering quality is relatively low, and quality accidents occur from time to time, directly endangering the lives of the people and the safety of property; at the same time, Also affected the steady development of the national economy, hinder the improvement of regional competitiveness. In view of the fact that China and Vietnam share the same national political system and similar cultural traditions and economic development models, the experience and achievements in quality management of construction projects between the two countries are worthy of study and reference by Vietnam. This paper attempts to study the development status and strategic orientation of quality supervision and management of construction industry in Vietnam through the comparative analysis of the construction quality supervision and management models between China and Vietnam at the implementation level (limited to grass-roots government level). This paper analyzes its current characteristics and existing problems, draws lessons from the experience and achievements of the Chinese grass-roots government in the practice of construction engineering quality supervision and management, and puts forward some suggestions for the reform of Vietnamese grass-roots government's construction project quality supervision and management mode. First of all, the status quo and strategic orientation of quality supervision and management of construction projects between China and Vietnam are analyzed, and the current situation of their respective management institutions, management systems and management mechanisms are elaborated in detail. This paper systematically introduces the mode of supervision and management of construction project quality of Chinese grass-roots government, and deeply analyzes the characteristics and problems existing in the supervision and management of construction project quality in Vietnam. Then, a unified questionnaire is designed to investigate the current situation of the supervision and management of construction quality in the grass-roots government of China and Vietnam. Based on the statistical analysis of survey data, this paper expounds the ways and effects of the mode of supervision and management of construction project quality of the grass-roots governments of China and Vietnam on the quality of construction projects, and compares and analyzes the effects of the modes of supervision and management on the quality of construction projects. This paper reveals the similarities and differences between China and Vietnam in the supervision and management of the construction quality of grass-roots government. Finally, the paper summarizes the achievements and experiences of Chinese grass-roots government in the past construction project quality supervision and management practice, and puts forward the reform measures of Vietnamese grass-roots government construction project quality supervision and management mode. In order to improve the quality of Vietnam construction project supervision and management level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU712.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭漢丁,劉應(yīng)宗;我國建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量政府監(jiān)督制度沿革[J];工程質(zhì)量;2002年04期

2 杜靜華;對建筑工程保險制度強(qiáng)制實行的探討[J];工程質(zhì)量;2005年01期

3 何伯洲,周顯峰,譚大璐;轉(zhuǎn)變工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)工作機(jī)制的研究[J];哈爾濱建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年03期

4 郭漢丁,劉應(yīng)宗;論建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量政府監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)改革[J];建筑;2002年01期

5 李明,高欣;國外工程保險制度的發(fā)展和基本內(nèi)容研究[J];基建優(yōu)化;2002年05期

6 孟憲海;國際工程保險制度研究借鑒[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年08期

7 劉應(yīng)宗,郭漢丁,孟俊娜;我國政府建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督工作的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年02期

8 張麗;;問卷設(shè)計中應(yīng)注意的幾個問題[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場;2011年04期

9 康等銀;;關(guān)于調(diào)查問卷設(shè)計應(yīng)注意幾個問題的研究[J];科技信息;2009年23期

10 張家漢;;建設(shè)工程的全過程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理[J];中國建設(shè)信息;2006年13期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭漢丁;建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量政府監(jiān)督管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2003年

本文編號：2235770