發(fā)布時間：2018-07-04 08:24

  本文選題：信息技術(shù) + 宗教心理�。� 參考：《長沙理工大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：宗教心理與信息技術(shù)的關(guān)系成為科學社會學、宗教社會學重點關(guān)注的對象,試圖厘清宗教寄托、彷徨與信息技術(shù)的關(guān)系。宗教對信息技術(shù)是否會重演壓迫、渾沌相處、各自獨立的線路圖呢?人們在心理上怎樣處置信息技術(shù)與宗教寄托?這需要從歷史的線索中,從現(xiàn)實的關(guān)系中,從對未來的預(yù)測中尋找答案,以便上升為理性具體,應(yīng)用到社會管理中。應(yīng)當承認,信息技術(shù)普及中的宗教心理與信息技術(shù)之前的“技術(shù)-宗教心理”具有密切聯(lián)系。工業(yè)革命,機械唯物主義思想沖擊著宗教心理,一些信徒從驚恐中掙脫了神的束縛,從無神論及其力學根據(jù)中找到了心靈的安慰,物質(zhì)輪回才是人類的歸宿。無神論思潮在我國的20世紀60年前后成為社會主要思潮,填補了原來有神論的空蕩,但工業(yè)技術(shù)卻沒有跟進思想的變化,有神論在民眾心理仍有空間。另一層面看,工業(yè)革命卻成為一部分民眾宗教執(zhí)著的寄托。物質(zhì)不滅、能量守恒和轉(zhuǎn)化、力學原理、進化論都不能成為改變信仰的理由,反過來可以用來說明神的循環(huán),科學成為宗教執(zhí)著的理由。電氣化產(chǎn)品也不能驅(qū)使宗教心靈的寄托,反過來卻形成“宗教沖動力”,電燈成為宗教儀式的襯托物,宗教與現(xiàn)代工業(yè)技術(shù)在物化產(chǎn)品,儀式流程上融合。宗教場所并不是一味到利用科技盡享神的祝福,宗教的異化致使宗教技術(shù)化的破碎,神圣祭祀被套上經(jīng)濟外衣,人們宗教信仰的心理趨勢產(chǎn)生分化。雙層導(dǎo)向呼吁一個新的技術(shù)和宗教寄托場所。信息技術(shù)應(yīng)運雙層導(dǎo)向而誕生,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)、萬維網(wǎng)、微信、網(wǎng)絡(luò)社區(qū)營造了一個信息時代,宗教心理攀援這一技術(shù)營造OFC(網(wǎng)上宗教社區(qū))。宗教信仰群體虛擬于網(wǎng)絡(luò),交流心得,修煉,成果,用科學解釋宗教,用宗教預(yù)測科學,尋找到新的宗教心理安慰�？駸嶙诮倘耸颗c網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)緣,年輕人也深受影響,據(jù)選樣調(diào)查,13歲-19歲的學生參與過OFC尋找宗教心靈安慰的占12%,這比起工業(yè)技術(shù)時代,提升了10%。更為值得注意的是,信息技術(shù)并沒有導(dǎo)致宗教心靈寄托的分化,宗教信仰人士、彷徨人士、好奇者都在利用信息技術(shù)上并不排斥宗教。熱愛網(wǎng)絡(luò)、喜歡網(wǎng)絡(luò)宗教儀式得到統(tǒng)一。信息技術(shù)拓寬了宗教傳播的渠道和平臺,也加速了宗教世俗化的進程,為宗教寄托尋找到了心靈安慰的場所。哈貝馬斯曾認為科學和技術(shù)本身就是一種意識形態(tài),統(tǒng)治了后工業(yè)社會人們的思想,信息技術(shù)能否成為宗教心理導(dǎo)向的意識形態(tài)呢?從實證和理性上看,信息技術(shù)可以作為“意識形態(tài)”促進宗教信仰主體技術(shù)能力和宗教文化能力,這兩者相結(jié)合成為影響宗教心理的技術(shù)基礎(chǔ)和文化基礎(chǔ)。但這一理性影響路徑仍然具有局限:難以排除信息技術(shù)對宗教心理的“額外壓抑”和操控,宗教心理難以承受信息技術(shù)來操控宗教。心理糾結(jié)呈現(xiàn):利用信息技術(shù)尋找宗教信仰場所,反過來又擔心技術(shù)操控宗教。信息技術(shù)對未來宗教心理的可能影響不是局限在純信息技術(shù)上,而是這一技術(shù)與宗教原理相關(guān)聯(lián)的科學上,如“信息技術(shù)+生命科學”將解構(gòu)傳統(tǒng)意義上的生命起源、神創(chuàng)論,宗教面臨新的信息流和生命方式的挑戰(zhàn),人們的心靈將再次受到震驚,社會宗教事務(wù)管理應(yīng)該有所警覺和思考怎樣構(gòu)思更為科學的宗教來解釋生命的起源、意義,以滿足新時代宗教心理寄托的需要。
[Abstract]:The relationship between religious psychology and information technology has become the focus of Sociology of science and the focus of religious sociology, trying to clarify the relationship between religious sustenance, hesitation and information technology. Is it possible for religions to repeat oppression, chaos, and independent circuit maps? How do people handle information technology and religious trust in Psychology? From the clue of history, we should find out the answer from the realistic relationship and the future prediction in order to rise to the rational and apply to the social management. It should be acknowledged that the religious psychology in the popularization of information technology has a close connection with the "technology religion psychology" before the information technology. In religious psychology, some believers broke free from the shackles of God from the horror and found the comfort of the mind from the atheism and its mechanical basis. Material reincarnation was the destination of human beings. The atheism became the main trend of thought in the 60 years of twentieth Century in our country, filled the empty space of the original theory of God, but the industrial technology did not follow the thought. On the other hand, the industrial revolution has become a part of the religious clinging of the people. Material is not extinguished, energy conservation and transformation, mechanics principle, evolution can not be the reason for changing faith, in turn can be used to explain the cycle of God, science becomes religious persistent reason. Electrified production. The product can not drive the religious spirit, and in turn form the "religious impulse", the electric lamp is the backing of the religious ceremony, the religion and the modern industrial technology merge in the materialized product and the ritual process. The religious place is not only to use science and technology to enjoy the blessing of God, the dissimilation of religion leads to the fragmentation of the religious technicalization, the sacred sacrifice. The psychological trend of people's religious beliefs is differentiated. Double direction calls for a new technology and religious place. Information technology should be shipped double direction and birth. The Internet, the world wide web, WeChat, and the network community have created an information age. Religious psychology climbs this technology to create OFC (online religious community). Religious belief groups are virtual on the Internet, communication, practice, achievements, scientific interpretation of religion, the use of religion to predict science, and the search for new religious psychological comfort. Fanatical religious people are associated with the Internet, and young people are also deeply affected. According to a sample survey, 12% of the students of the age of 13, aged 13, have participated in the search for religious consolation of religious souls, compared with industrial technology. In the times, the promotion of 10%. is even more noteworthy. Information technology does not lead to the differentiation of religious souls. Religious believers, wandering people, and curious people do not exclude religion in the use of information technology. They love the network and enjoy the unification of network religious rites. Information technology broadens the channels and platforms of religious communication and accelerates the development of religion. The process of secularization of religion, the place for religious consolation, Habermas once thought that science and technology itself was an ideology, ruled the ideas of the people in the post industrial society, and could information technology be an ideology guided by religious psychology? From an empirical and rational perspective, information technology can be used as a "ideology". Ideology "promotes the technical ability and religious cultural ability of the subject of religious belief, which combines the technical and cultural basis of religious psychology. However, the path of this rational influence is still limited: it is difficult to exclude the" extra suppression "and manipulation of information technology to religious psychology, and the religious psychology is difficult to bear information technology. To manipulate religion. Psychological entanglement shows: using information technology to find religious belief sites, and in turn worried about technology manipulation of religion. The possible influence of information technology on future religious psychology is not confined to pure information technology, but the science associated with the principle of religion, such as "information technology + life science", will be deconstructed. The origin of life, the creationism, the challenge of the new information flow and the way of life, the spirit of people will be shocked again. The management of social and religious affairs should be vigilant and think about how to conceive the more scientific religion to explain the origin and significance of life to meet the needs of the religious psychology of the new age.
【學位授予單位】：長沙理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：TP399;B920

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣顯榮;郭霞;;信息技術(shù)女性用戶對信息技術(shù)設(shè)計的影響[J];自然辯證法研究;2016年03期

2 蔣顯榮;魏芳;;探究人腦意識機理的唯物主義方法論[J];長沙理工大學學報(社會科學版);2015年06期

3 蒯正明;;馬爾庫塞的科學技術(shù)意識形態(tài)理論評析[J];東北大學學報(社會科學版);2015年06期

4 邁克爾·馬丁;韓琪;;無神論、不可知論和有神論[J];科學與無神論;2015年04期

5 金勛;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代世界宗教的新形態(tài)[J];中國宗教;2015年04期

6 梁磊;;略論英國宗教改革對工業(yè)革命的影響[J];長春師范大學學報;2014年11期

7 韓琪;;西方無神論思想發(fā)展的啟示[J];科學與無神論;2014年06期

8 梁頤;;新媒介技術(shù)影響下的宗教傳播發(fā)展探析[J];新聞世界;2014年10期

9 陳治國;;哈貝馬斯科學技術(shù)意識形態(tài)理論探析[J];科學技術(shù)哲學研究;2014年04期

10 管錦繡;;哈貝馬斯的科學技術(shù)意識形態(tài)論的時代意蘊[J];武漢理工大學學報(社會科學版);2013年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 張祝平;;民間信仰發(fā)展面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與選擇[N];中國民族報;2011年

2 何光滬;;中國宗教學百年回顧[N];中國社會科學院院報;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 張U，

本文編號：2095449