基于政社企關(guān)系再造視角下煤炭資源收益共享研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-27 10:35
【摘要】：經(jīng)濟利益的核心問題是在不同的利益主體之間合理分配。政社企作為基本的利益主體,三者具有密切的關(guān)系。一般來說,政府是社會治理的主體,為公眾服務;企業(yè)是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的微觀主體,促進經(jīng)濟發(fā)展;社會是一個有機整體,代表個體間的存在關(guān)系的總和以及所在環(huán)境。而圍繞煤炭資源收益形成的政社企主體則具有更為復雜的性質(zhì)。由于煤炭資源的開發(fā)不同于一般的工業(yè)品制造:煤炭資源開發(fā)涉及到代際資源配置,需要協(xié)調(diào)和后代之間的關(guān)系;煤炭資源開發(fā)對長期的環(huán)境破壞,導致地區(qū)非資源產(chǎn)業(yè)特別是制造業(yè)的擠出,嚴重滯后資源地的工業(yè)化進程,卻不通過市場機制解決。傳統(tǒng)政企關(guān)系下,煤炭資源收益共享的方式具有局限性,作為煤炭資源的管理者政府,缺乏對超額資源收益的管控,注重資源節(jié)約和能源安全,單純控制企業(yè)生產(chǎn)量,忽視煤炭在代際配置上的效率性,不能解決資源開采帶來的負外部性;企業(yè)發(fā)展也嚴重依賴資源,生產(chǎn)效率低。同時,相關(guān)利益群體難以真正受益,特別是社會主體中的資源地環(huán)境、居民。致使政府、企業(yè)、社會間利益糾紛迭起,中央與地方、地方與企業(yè)之間權(quán)益博弈矛盾不斷,后代、環(huán)境、地區(qū)經(jīng)濟等方面的利益沒有充分考慮。因此在這樣的關(guān)系下,這種經(jīng)濟發(fā)展模式不論在資源使用效率上還是在功能設(shè)計的合理性上,都會逐漸帶來經(jīng)濟發(fā)展問題。在新時期,應該對政社企關(guān)系進行再造,在建立新型政企關(guān)系下構(gòu)建現(xiàn)代化的煤炭資源收益共享實現(xiàn)路徑,政府加強對超額資源收益的管控,社會相關(guān)利益主體直接參與資源收益的初次分配,企業(yè)發(fā)展從資源依賴轉(zhuǎn)化為多元發(fā)展,真正使資源要素的使用配置達到最優(yōu)。
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic interest is the rational distribution among different interest subjects. As the basic interest subject, the three have close relationship. Generally speaking, the government is the main body of social governance and serves the public; the enterprise is the microcosmic subject of economic development, which promotes economic development; the society is an organic whole, representing the sum of the relationships between individuals and the environment in which they exist. But the main body of government, society and enterprise formed around the coal resource income has more complex nature. Since the exploitation of coal resources is different from that of industrial products in general: the exploitation of coal resources involves the allocation of intergenerational resources and needs to be coordinated with the relationship between future generations, and the exploitation of coal resources causes long-term environmental damage. It leads to the extrusion of non-resource industries, especially the manufacturing industry, which seriously lags behind the industrialization process of natural resources, but does not solve through the market mechanism. Under the traditional relationship between government and enterprise, the mode of coal resource income sharing is limited. As the manager of coal resource, the government lacks the control of excess resource income, pays attention to resource saving and energy security, and simply controls the production of enterprise. Ignoring the efficiency of intergenerational allocation of coal can not solve the negative externality brought by the exploitation of resources, and the development of enterprises depends heavily on resources and the production efficiency is low. At the same time, it is difficult for the relevant interest groups to benefit, especially the resources, environment and residents in the social subject. As a result, the interests disputes among government, enterprise and society are in succession, and the interests of central and local governments, local governments and enterprises are not fully considered, and the interests of future generations, environment, regional economy and so on are not fully considered. Therefore, in such a relationship, this mode of economic development will gradually bring problems of economic development, whether in the efficiency of resource use or in the rationality of functional design. In the new period, we should rebuild the relationship between government, society and enterprise, construct a modern way to realize the sharing of coal resources revenue under the establishment of a new relationship between government and enterprises, and strengthen the government's control over the excess resources income. Social stakeholders directly participate in the initial allocation of resource income, and the development of enterprises is transformed from resource dependence to pluralistic development, which really makes the use and allocation of resource elements optimal.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.21
本文編號：2147549
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic interest is the rational distribution among different interest subjects. As the basic interest subject, the three have close relationship. Generally speaking, the government is the main body of social governance and serves the public; the enterprise is the microcosmic subject of economic development, which promotes economic development; the society is an organic whole, representing the sum of the relationships between individuals and the environment in which they exist. But the main body of government, society and enterprise formed around the coal resource income has more complex nature. Since the exploitation of coal resources is different from that of industrial products in general: the exploitation of coal resources involves the allocation of intergenerational resources and needs to be coordinated with the relationship between future generations, and the exploitation of coal resources causes long-term environmental damage. It leads to the extrusion of non-resource industries, especially the manufacturing industry, which seriously lags behind the industrialization process of natural resources, but does not solve through the market mechanism. Under the traditional relationship between government and enterprise, the mode of coal resource income sharing is limited. As the manager of coal resource, the government lacks the control of excess resource income, pays attention to resource saving and energy security, and simply controls the production of enterprise. Ignoring the efficiency of intergenerational allocation of coal can not solve the negative externality brought by the exploitation of resources, and the development of enterprises depends heavily on resources and the production efficiency is low. At the same time, it is difficult for the relevant interest groups to benefit, especially the resources, environment and residents in the social subject. As a result, the interests disputes among government, enterprise and society are in succession, and the interests of central and local governments, local governments and enterprises are not fully considered, and the interests of future generations, environment, regional economy and so on are not fully considered. Therefore, in such a relationship, this mode of economic development will gradually bring problems of economic development, whether in the efficiency of resource use or in the rationality of functional design. In the new period, we should rebuild the relationship between government, society and enterprise, construct a modern way to realize the sharing of coal resources revenue under the establishment of a new relationship between government and enterprises, and strengthen the government's control over the excess resources income. Social stakeholders directly participate in the initial allocation of resource income, and the development of enterprises is transformed from resource dependence to pluralistic development, which really makes the use and allocation of resource elements optimal.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.21
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳宗勝;;克服供給側(cè)缺陷,保持經(jīng)濟中高速增長[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2016年13期
2 李硯忠;;治理現(xiàn)代化視域下的政社企關(guān)系再造——《經(jīng)濟社會體制比較》雜志創(chuàng)刊30周年座談會暨“國家治理現(xiàn)代化:政社企關(guān)系再造”研討會綜述[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2016年01期
3 韓保江;;依法建立好的市場經(jīng)濟[J];理論視野;2015年01期
4 唐賢衡;;礦業(yè)城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論探析[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2014年06期
5 劉尚希;朱長才;葉翠青;朱克俊;程丹潤;汪文志;張學誕;刑麗;施文潑;陳龍;周象民;趙慧;梁洪波;崔更發(fā);史生榮;洪薩茹拉;范亞平;孫長杰;李蕾;張博;孫晴;蘇新泉;武永義;周正;李享林;范偉;;資源稅、房產(chǎn)稅改革及對地方財政影響分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2013年21期
6 宋迎法;吳曉蘭;;企業(yè)、政府與社會關(guān)系的研究:文獻述評[J];理論月刊;2012年06期
7 徐曉亮;許學芬;;資源稅稅率設(shè)置分析、比較和選擇[J];自然資源學報;2012年01期
8 周偉;武康平;;個稅免征額、稅率與拉弗曲線[J];經(jīng)濟學家;2011年10期
9 張炳雷;;國有企業(yè)承擔社會責任的政府規(guī)制研究[J];中國行政管理;2011年05期
10 鄧澤宏;何應龍;;企業(yè)社會責任運動中的政府作用研究[J];中國行政管理;2010年11期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 張碩;政府與企業(yè)關(guān)系研究[D];吉林大學;2008年
，本文編號：2147549
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/kuangye/2147549.html
最近更新
教材專著
