層次分析法對(duì)東非港口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-05-10 22:33
本文研究東非港口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的評(píng)價(jià),旨在分析和找出影響港口特別是達(dá)累斯薩拉姆、蒙巴薩、蘇丹和吉布提港口的關(guān)鍵因素。前人的一些研究已經(jīng)為解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題提供了豐富的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和重要的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),本文旨在既定的幾個(gè)港口中比較分析出更具有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的港口,即達(dá)累斯薩拉姆、蒙巴薩、蘇丹和吉布提港口。眾所周知,在東非港口和區(qū)域交通是相互依存的,改善港口的流通性是增長(zhǎng)港口貿(mào)易的主要因素之一。因此,本次研究主要通過(guò)相關(guān)專家提出的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),針對(duì)東非港口(主要包括達(dá)累斯薩拉姆、蒙巴薩、蘇丹和吉布提港口)運(yùn)用層次分析法(AHP)對(duì)港口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。盡管在該地區(qū)的其他港口的激烈競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。本次研究證實(shí)了這個(gè)研究的真實(shí)性,在港口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力方面,蒙巴薩港得分最高,排名第一。其次是吉布提港。這份研究報(bào)告肯定了蒙巴薩港在東非地區(qū)的表現(xiàn)是最具競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力和效率的根據(jù)一項(xiàng)由UNCTAD研究中,蒙巴薩港被列為在非洲的五大港口中最具有其競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的。
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:57 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
摘要 Abstract 1. Introduction
1.1 Background of the study
1.2 Literature review
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Structure of this thesis 2 East Africa Ports and Instance for Maritime Container Services
2.1 Overview of East Africa Ports
2.1.1 Port of Mombasa
2.1.2 Port of Dar-es-Salaam
2.1.3 Port of Djibouti
2.1.4 Port of Sudan
2.2. Instance for maritime container services 3. Matheematical model
3.1 Selection of methods
3.2 AHP method
3.2.1 Overview of AHP
3.2.2 Hierarchy tree
3.2.3 Computing relative weights
3.2.4. Consistency check and ranking alternatives
3.3. Criteria and data analysis
3.3.1 Criteria and data 4. Port Competitiveness: Evaluation and Analysis
4.1. Pairwise comparison and weight for major criteria
4.2. Pairwise comparison and weights of sub-criteria
4.3 Ranking and analysis 5. Conclusion References Acknowledgement
本文編號(hào):3969114
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:57 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
摘要 Abstract 1. Introduction
1.1 Background of the study
1.2 Literature review
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Structure of this thesis 2 East Africa Ports and Instance for Maritime Container Services
2.1 Overview of East Africa Ports
2.1.1 Port of Mombasa
2.1.2 Port of Dar-es-Salaam
2.1.3 Port of Djibouti
2.1.4 Port of Sudan
2.2. Instance for maritime container services 3. Matheematical model
3.1 Selection of methods
3.2 AHP method
3.2.1 Overview of AHP
3.2.2 Hierarchy tree
3.2.3 Computing relative weights
3.2.4. Consistency check and ranking alternatives
3.3. Criteria and data analysis
3.3.1 Criteria and data 4. Port Competitiveness: Evaluation and Analysis
4.1. Pairwise comparison and weight for major criteria
4.2. Pairwise comparison and weights of sub-criteria
4.3 Ranking and analysis 5. Conclusion References Acknowledgement
本文編號(hào):3969114
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/jiaotonggongchenglunwen/3969114.html
最近更新
教材專著