基于近紅外技術(shù)快速測(cè)定不同鮮肉中脂肪含量
[Abstract]:With the rapid increase in the consumption of livestock and poultry meat and meat products, people have put forward higher requirements for meat quality. For meat products, consumers are most concerned about meat quality. At present, the research and application of meat quality online inspection in China is relatively few, and there is no equipment developed for meat quality online nondestructive testing. Also did not really invest in the meat production and processing process. The near infrared fast detection model of fat in different meat products was studied. The difference analysis was carried out by standard chemical method. The pork, beef and mutton were scanned by near-infrared technique. The chemical value of fresh meat fat was determined by Soxhlet extraction method. PLS (partial least square method) was used as modeling method. The model of the relationship between the near infrared spectrum parameters and the fat content of pig beef and mutton was established by different spectral pretreatment methods. The results showed that, for pork, the model with the first order guide Norris in the band of 4 260 0 014 cm ~ (-1) was the best, its corrected correlation coefficient and predictive correlation coefficient were 0.955 6 and 0.961 6, respectively, while for beef, the correlation coefficient of correction and prediction were 0.955 6 and 0.961 6, respectively. The model established by selecting the first order guide S-G in the band of 5226 ~ (7 343cm ~ (-1) was the best, the calibration correlation coefficient and the predictive correlation coefficient were 0.923 5 and 0.942 7, respectively. For mutton, the model of the first order guide Norris in the band of 52077 367 cm ~ (-1) was the best. The corrected correlation coefficient and predicted correlation coefficient were 0.915 7 and 0.939 6, respectively, and for fresh meat, the model with second-order derivative S-G was the best, the calibration correlation coefficient and prediction correlation coefficient were 0.916 3 and 0.919 4, respectively. The calibration correlation coefficient of all the above models is greater than 0.91.The model has higher precision and meets the needs of different meat products in actual production. It has the advantages of fast analysis, low detection cost, high resolution and nondestructive.
【作者單位】: 山西出入境檢驗(yàn)檢疫局;中北大學(xué);
【基金】:山西省科技攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目(20150313015)資助
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:O657.33;TS251.7
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 曹景森,胡詠梅;堿液濃度在線檢測(cè)控制的研究[J];計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用研究;1996年05期
2 周德平,張渝,成瓊,謝家理;高濃度二氧化氯氣體的在線檢測(cè)研究[J];分析試驗(yàn)室;2005年08期
3 虞大紅,金麗萍,馮仰婕;溶解熱計(jì)算機(jī)在線檢測(cè)實(shí)驗(yàn)總結(jié)[J];化工高等教育;1998年03期
4 李玫,孫瑩,靳丹紅,任玉秋,任玉林,李偉,郭曄;PLS—近紅外漫反射光譜法非破壞分析磺胺脒[J];計(jì)算機(jī)與應(yīng)用化學(xué);1999年01期
5 金順平;李建權(quán);韓海燕;王鴻梅;儲(chǔ)焰南;周士康;;質(zhì)子轉(zhuǎn)移反應(yīng)質(zhì)譜在線檢測(cè)痕量揮發(fā)性有機(jī)物[J];化學(xué)進(jìn)展;2007年06期
6 沈成銀;李建權(quán);王宏志;志中華;王鴻梅;黃超群;劉升;江海河;儲(chǔ)焰南;;呼氣中痕量揮發(fā)性有機(jī)物的質(zhì)子轉(zhuǎn)移反應(yīng)質(zhì)譜在線檢測(cè)研究[J];分析化學(xué);2012年05期
7 吳烈剛;;基于紫外熒光技術(shù)總硫檢測(cè)系統(tǒng)的應(yīng)用及安裝調(diào)試[J];石化技術(shù);2014年02期
8 曾廣植;沈定璋;聶崇實(shí);;Ⅱ.芳香胺類(lèi)中新型σ~-值的應(yīng)用[J];化學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1966年02期
9 趙華明,黎耀忠;對(duì)Dewar的FMMF方法的改進(jìn),幾種延伸的共軛體系上取代基常數(shù)的計(jì)算及其與幾種理化數(shù)據(jù)關(guān)聯(lián)的相關(guān)系數(shù)[J];原子與分子物理學(xué)報(bào);1984年00期
10 楊迪,竇英,任玉林;PLS—近紅外漫反射光譜法分析片劑藥品補(bǔ)熱息痛[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李世君;流動(dòng)注射化學(xué)發(fā)光及其結(jié)合PLS在藥物分析中的應(yīng)用[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號(hào):2243819
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huaxue/2243819.html