油污生態(tài)損害救濟的規(guī)則選擇——基于“卡-梅框架”展開的分析
發(fā)布時間:2018-09-14 06:57
【摘要】:法經(jīng)濟學中的"卡-梅框架"以法律規(guī)則的效果模式為研究視角,為油污生態(tài)損害的法律救濟提供了關于規(guī)則選擇與效率比較的分析框架。從這一理論出發(fā),可以從"道德風險"與"風險厭惡"的角度解釋建立、健全油污防治法律規(guī)則的必要性。通過案例研究發(fā)現(xiàn),"卡-梅框架"下的各種規(guī)則有其內(nèi)在的區(qū)分邏輯、適用場合與社會成本。因此,應當以評估油污事故風險的難易程度為區(qū)分依據(jù),在事前監(jiān)管階段運用禁易規(guī)則和管制規(guī)則,在事后懲戒階段適用責任規(guī)則和財產(chǎn)規(guī)則。同時,降低油污生態(tài)損害的估價成本,明確油氣企業(yè)的環(huán)境義務與法律責任,充分發(fā)揮"卡-梅框架"的最大效用。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the effect model of legal rules, the "Kar-Mei Framework" in law and economics provides an analytical framework for the legal relief of oil pollution ecological damage by comparing the choice of rules with the comparison of efficiency. Based on this theory, the necessity of establishing and perfecting the legal rules of oil pollution prevention and control can be explained from the angle of moral hazard and risk aversion. Through the case study, it is found that the rules under the "Cartesian Framework" have their intrinsic distinguishing logic, applicable situation and social cost. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish the degree of difficulty in assessing the risk of oil pollution accident, to apply the rules of prohibition and control in the stage of prior supervision, and to apply the rules of responsibility and property in the stage of punishment afterwards. At the same time, the evaluation cost of oil pollution ecological damage should be reduced, the environmental obligations and legal responsibilities of oil and gas enterprises should be clarified, and the maximum utility of "Kar-Mei frame" should be brought into full play.
【作者單位】: 重慶大學;重慶大學法學院;
【分類號】:D996.9;D922.68
,
本文編號:2241902
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the effect model of legal rules, the "Kar-Mei Framework" in law and economics provides an analytical framework for the legal relief of oil pollution ecological damage by comparing the choice of rules with the comparison of efficiency. Based on this theory, the necessity of establishing and perfecting the legal rules of oil pollution prevention and control can be explained from the angle of moral hazard and risk aversion. Through the case study, it is found that the rules under the "Cartesian Framework" have their intrinsic distinguishing logic, applicable situation and social cost. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish the degree of difficulty in assessing the risk of oil pollution accident, to apply the rules of prohibition and control in the stage of prior supervision, and to apply the rules of responsibility and property in the stage of punishment afterwards. At the same time, the evaluation cost of oil pollution ecological damage should be reduced, the environmental obligations and legal responsibilities of oil and gas enterprises should be clarified, and the maximum utility of "Kar-Mei frame" should be brought into full play.
【作者單位】: 重慶大學;重慶大學法學院;
【分類號】:D996.9;D922.68
,
本文編號:2241902
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/2241902.html
最近更新
教材專著