【摘要】：作為巖土加固、穩(wěn)定結(jié)構(gòu)的最經(jīng)濟(jì)、高效的方法,巖土錨固技術(shù)誕生之日起就得到了工程技術(shù)人員的親睞。不當(dāng)?shù)氖┕すに嚰斑\(yùn)營(yíng)管理會(huì)把預(yù)應(yīng)力錨索變成一個(gè)可能使工程毀于一旦的“定時(shí)炸彈”,因此預(yù)應(yīng)力錨索錨固質(zhì)量也一直是人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,而作為衡量錨索的錨固質(zhì)量的重要參數(shù)——錨下有效預(yù)應(yīng)力(錨固力)自然也受到人們的關(guān)注。但是巖土錨固工程屬于長(zhǎng)期、隱蔽工程,這給錨下有效預(yù)應(yīng)力(錨固力)的檢測(cè)帶來(lái)了一定的困難。探索高效、準(zhǔn)確、經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)用的檢測(cè)方法,成為擺在巖土工作者面前的一個(gè)課題。因此,本文立題對(duì)此開(kāi)展研究。本文對(duì)錨索預(yù)應(yīng)力的損失機(jī)制展開(kāi)研究,主要研究了預(yù)應(yīng)力錨索內(nèi)錨固段荷載分布、錨索失效和錨索預(yù)應(yīng)力損失的影響因素。首先,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,研究了第一粘結(jié)面和第二粘結(jié)面的剪應(yīng)力分布模式,兩個(gè)粘結(jié)面的剪力分布模式有較明顯差異:剪切應(yīng)力的峰值及其位置均不相同;然后,根據(jù)現(xiàn)有的工程調(diào)研資料分析了五種不同的錨索失效形式:外錨固段失效、錨束體斷裂、第一粘結(jié)面滑移破壞、第二粘結(jié)面滑移破壞、被加固巖土體破壞;最后,通過(guò)分析預(yù)應(yīng)力損失的影響因素,得出了錨下有效預(yù)應(yīng)力(錨固力)的理論計(jì)算公式sde-=NNN0,為有效預(yù)應(yīng)力判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定提供參考。針對(duì)工程實(shí)踐中對(duì)錨索預(yù)應(yīng)力的檢測(cè)只注重整個(gè)錨索的預(yù)應(yīng)力,對(duì)錨索中每根鋼絞線的預(yù)應(yīng)力的不均勻情況較少涉及的情況,本文提出了不均勻度的概念,并通過(guò)兩種不同的反拉方法——整體反拉法和分組反拉法——對(duì)此展開(kāi)理論和試驗(yàn)研究。首先,詳細(xì)分析了反拉法檢測(cè)過(guò)程中錨束體應(yīng)力-應(yīng)變變化關(guān)系,建立錨索有效預(yù)應(yīng)力判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn);然后根據(jù)工程實(shí)踐和理論分析,對(duì)現(xiàn)行技術(shù)規(guī)范《公路橋涵施工技術(shù)規(guī)范》中關(guān)于有效預(yù)應(yīng)力合格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的表述提出自己的見(jiàn)解;最后,通過(guò)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)的試驗(yàn)對(duì)分組反拉法的檢測(cè)精度、對(duì)鋼絞線應(yīng)力不均勻度、有效預(yù)應(yīng)力合格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行研究。本文對(duì)基于聲彈性理論的無(wú)損檢測(cè)方法的工程可行性進(jìn)行了初步討論。首先,對(duì)該無(wú)損檢測(cè)方法的兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題——聲彈性系數(shù)確定和彈性波的選擇——進(jìn)行了討論;接下來(lái),通過(guò)對(duì)試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)的處理和分析,驗(yàn)證了該無(wú)損檢測(cè)方法的工程可行性;最后,對(duì)無(wú)損檢測(cè)方法的檢測(cè)精度影響因素和在工程中的應(yīng)用前景進(jìn)行討論。
[Abstract]:As the most economical and efficient method to strengthen and stabilize the structure of rock and soil, the Anchorage technology of rock and soil has been favored by engineers and technicians since its birth. Improper construction technology and operation management will turn the prestressed anchor cable into a "time bomb" which may destroy the project. Therefore, the quality of prestressed anchor cable anchoring has always been the focus of attention. As an important parameter to evaluate the anchoring quality of anchor cables, the effective prestress under anchor (anchoring force) is also concerned by people. However, geotechnical anchoring works belong to long-term and hidden projects, which bring some difficulties to the detection of effective prestressing force under anchors. It has become a subject for geotechnical workers to explore efficient, accurate and economical detection methods. Therefore, this article raises the topic to carry on the research to this. In this paper, the loss mechanism of prestressed cable is studied, and the factors influencing the load distribution, the failure of anchor cable and the prestress loss of prestressed cable are studied. Firstly, on the basis of previous studies, the shear stress distribution modes of the first and the second bonding surfaces are studied. The shear stress distribution modes of the two bonding surfaces are obviously different: the peak value and the location of the shear stress are different; Then, according to the existing engineering investigation data, five different failure forms of anchor cable are analyzed: failure of external anchoring section, fracture of anchor body, slip failure of the first bond plane, slip failure of the second bond surface, and failure of the strengthened rock and soil; Finally, by analyzing the influencing factors of prestress loss, the theoretical calculation formula of effective prestress under anchor (Anchorage force) is obtained. Sde-=NNN0, provides a reference for the determination of effective prestressing force. In view of the fact that the detection of anchor cable prestress only pays attention to the prestress of the whole anchor cable in engineering practice, and the non-uniformity of the prestress of each steel strand in the anchor cable is less concerned, the concept of non-uniformity degree is put forward in this paper. The theoretical and experimental studies are carried out through two different backpull methods, the global backpull method and the group backpull method. Firstly, the relationship between stress and strain of Anchorage is analyzed in detail, and the criterion of effective prestress of anchor cable is established. Then according to the engineering practice and theoretical analysis, the author puts forward his own opinion on the expression of the qualified standard of effective prestress in the current technical code of highway bridge and culvert construction. Finally, through the field test, the test accuracy of the group back pull method, the stress inhomogeneity of steel strand and the qualified standard of effective prestress are studied. In this paper, the engineering feasibility of nondestructive testing method based on acoustic elasticity theory is discussed. Firstly, two key problems of the NDT method, namely, the determination of acoustic elastic coefficient and the selection of elastic wave, are discussed, and the engineering feasibility of the NDT method is verified by processing and analyzing the test data. Finally, the influencing factors of nondestructive testing method and its application prospect in engineering are discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：U416

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 唐樹(shù)名,羅斌,劉涌江;巖土錨固安全性無(wú)損檢測(cè)技術(shù)[J];公路交通技術(shù);2005年05期

2 羅斌;唐樹(shù)名;程曉輝;郭紅仙;;錨下預(yù)應(yīng)力反拉檢測(cè)技術(shù)[J];公路交通技術(shù);2012年01期

3 劉增華;劉溯;吳斌;張易農(nóng);何存富;;預(yù)應(yīng)力鋼絞線中超聲導(dǎo)波聲彈性效應(yīng)的試驗(yàn)研究[J];機(jī)械工程學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 彭斌,劉春生,肖柏勛,朱自強(qiáng);錨桿錨固質(zhì)量無(wú)損檢測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)的分析與處理[J];物探化探計(jì)算技術(shù);2003年03期

5 蘇學(xué)貴,李彥斌,孟秀生;錨索預(yù)應(yīng)力損失影響因素分析[J];西安礦業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年S1期

6 張端良,董燕軍,唐樂(lè)人,胡毅夫;預(yù)應(yīng)力錨索錨固段周邊剪應(yīng)力分布特性的彈性理論分析[J];巖石力學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2004年S2期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張俊;基于聲彈性原理的超聲波螺栓緊固力測(cè)量技術(shù)研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2413354