本文選題：車橋耦合振動(dòng) + 動(dòng)力沖擊系數(shù)��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：中小跨徑梁橋構(gòu)造簡(jiǎn)單、受力明確,具有設(shè)計(jì)和施工高度標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的特點(diǎn),是世界上應(yīng)用最為廣泛的橋型。截至2010年底,我國(guó)公路橋梁已經(jīng)超過(guò)65萬(wàn)座,中小跨徑梁橋占據(jù)了其中絕大部分。然而近幾十年來(lái)公路運(yùn)輸需求迅速擴(kuò)大,車輛荷載、數(shù)量和車速均不斷提高,橋梁失效事件時(shí)有發(fā)生,使得明確中小跨徑梁橋在移動(dòng)車輛荷載作用下的動(dòng)力荷載效應(yīng)、獲得準(zhǔn)確的橋梁動(dòng)力沖擊系數(shù)(IM)以用于評(píng)估既有橋梁承載力和合理指導(dǎo)新橋設(shè)計(jì),成為橋梁領(lǐng)域亟待解決的重要問(wèn)題。世界各國(guó)(包括我國(guó))學(xué)者已經(jīng)指出橋梁設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范中使用的沖擊系數(shù)可能低估了橋梁的實(shí)際動(dòng)力響應(yīng)。且目前關(guān)于橋梁支承方式、橋梁截面類型、橋梁受力構(gòu)件材料、車輛荷載等級(jí)等因素對(duì)IM的影響的研究不夠深入。規(guī)范計(jì)算IM時(shí),對(duì)這些重要影響因素也并未加以考慮。本文建立了基于車橋耦合振動(dòng)理論的IM研究方法,對(duì)中小跨徑梁橋在車輛荷載作用下的IM進(jìn)行了研究,深入探討了IM受截面形式、支承方式、路面等級(jí)、橋梁跨徑、行車速度等因素影響的規(guī)律,獲得了一些有意義的結(jié)論。這些成果可做為規(guī)范的補(bǔ)充為橋梁研究人員和工程師所參考。主要內(nèi)容如下:(1)推導(dǎo)和建立了車輛、橋梁的有限元模型和車橋耦合振動(dòng)動(dòng)力學(xué)方程,結(jié)合模態(tài)疊加法,推導(dǎo)了逐步迭代求解的數(shù)值算法,給出了編制電算程序的流程。(2)通過(guò)數(shù)值模擬方法計(jì)算了多種不同類型中小跨徑梁橋在復(fù)雜行駛工況下的IM,用計(jì)算結(jié)果對(duì)中美橋梁設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范進(jìn)行了檢驗(yàn),指出了我國(guó)89規(guī)范、04規(guī)范設(shè)計(jì)值可能低估了車輛行駛時(shí)橋梁的實(shí)際IM。(3)計(jì)算了常見不同截面類型梁橋的IM。對(duì)路面平整度、車輛類型、行車速度等重要因素進(jìn)行了參數(shù)分析,指出不同截面類型橋梁的IM具有較大的離散性,其差異應(yīng)引起工程人員的注意。(4)建立了混凝土簡(jiǎn)支橋梁、連續(xù)梁橋及鋼主梁—混凝土面板橋梁模型,分別探討了連續(xù)梁橋IM和簡(jiǎn)支梁橋IM、彎矩IM和剪力IM的差異。發(fā)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)行規(guī)范對(duì)橋梁支承方式、橋梁上部結(jié)構(gòu)材料引起的IM差異的考慮不足,將現(xiàn)行規(guī)范應(yīng)用于連續(xù)梁橋和組合梁橋可能并不十分合理。
[Abstract]:Small and medium span girder bridge is the most widely used bridge type in the world because of its simple structure, clear force and high standardization in design and construction. Up to the end of 2010, there are more than 650000 highway bridges in China, most of which are small and medium span girder bridges. However, in recent decades, the demand for highway transportation has expanded rapidly, the vehicle load, quantity and speed have been increasing continuously, and the bridge failure events have occurred from time to time, which makes clear the dynamic load effect of small and medium-sized span beam bridge under moving vehicle load. Obtaining accurate dynamic impact coefficient (IMC) of bridges to evaluate the bearing capacity of existing bridges and reasonably guide the design of new bridges has become an important problem to be solved urgently in the field of bridges. Scholars from all over the world (including China) have pointed out that the impact coefficient used in the bridge design code may underestimate the actual dynamic response of the bridge. At present, the research on the influence of bridge supporting mode, bridge section type, bridge bearing material, vehicle load grade and other factors on IM is not deep enough. These important factors are not taken into account when calculating IM. In this paper, an IM research method based on vehicle-bridge coupling vibration theory is established, and the IM of medium and small span beam bridge under vehicle load is studied, and the form of section, supporting mode, pavement grade, span of bridge are deeply discussed. Some meaningful conclusions are obtained on the influence of driving speed and other factors. These results can be used as a reference for bridge researchers and engineers. The main contents are as follows: (1) the finite element model of vehicle and bridge and the dynamic equation of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration are derived and established. Combined with the modal superposition method, the numerical algorithm of step by step iterative solution is derived. The flow chart of compiling computer program is given. (2) through numerical simulation method, the IMMOs of many different types of small and medium span girder bridges under complex driving conditions are calculated, and the design codes of bridges in China and America are tested with the results of calculation. It is pointed out that the design value of the code YI04 of 89 code of our country may underestimate the actual IM.3 of the bridge when the vehicle is running) and calculate the IMs of the common beam bridges of different cross-section types. This paper analyzes the important factors such as pavement smoothness, vehicle type, driving speed and so on, and points out that the IM of different cross-section bridges has greater discreteness, the difference of which should attract the attention of engineers. The model of continuous beam bridge and steel main beam-concrete slab bridge is discussed, and the difference of IM, moment IM and shear IM of continuous beam bridge and simply supported beam bridge is discussed respectively. It is found that the current code does not consider the bridge support mode and the IM difference caused by the bridge superstructure material, and it may not be very reasonable to apply the current code to continuous beam bridges and composite beam bridges.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：U441.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳曉華;李海超;劉錫鑫;;中小跨度橋梁重裝備通過(guò)性快速檢測(cè)評(píng)估研究[J];軍事交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年09期

2 殷新鋒;劉揚(yáng);彭暉;陳明;;路面破損的橋梁在車輛作用下沖擊系數(shù)分析[J];振動(dòng)工程學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

3 王德山;桂水榮;吳志斌;陳水生;;多跨連續(xù)梁橋荷載試驗(yàn)及承載力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];中外公路;2012年03期

4 李運(yùn)生;史莉莉;王錚峰;;鋼-混凝土簡(jiǎn)支組合箱梁橋在車輛荷載作用下的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)及沖擊系數(shù)研究[J];石家莊鐵道大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年01期

5 韓萬(wàn)水;馬麟;院素靜;趙盛民;;路面粗糙度非一致激勵(lì)對(duì)車橋耦合振動(dòng)系統(tǒng)響應(yīng)影響分析[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年10期

6 施尚偉;趙劍;舒紹云;;梁橋沖擊系數(shù)實(shí)測(cè)值與規(guī)范取值差異分析[J];世界橋梁;2010年02期

7 黃新藝;卓衛(wèi)東;盛洪飛;李立云;;車橋耦合振動(dòng)系統(tǒng)模型下橋梁沖擊效應(yīng)研究[J];公路交通科技;2010年03期

8 李龍海;張獻(xiàn)民;;橋面平整度與沖擊系數(shù)相關(guān)實(shí)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國(guó)民航大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

9 郭騫;唐光武;寇曉娜;;公路中小跨徑舊橋檢測(cè)及承載力評(píng)估方法[J];交通標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2008年04期

10 李小珍;張黎明;張潔;;公路橋梁與車輛耦合振動(dòng)研究現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];工程力學(xué);2008年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 謝紅生;輕軌高架鐵路車橋耦合振動(dòng)分析[D];天津大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1860419