本文選題：尼爾森體系 + 動(dòng)力特性　； 參考：《蘭州交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,針對(duì)尼爾森體系系桿拱橋動(dòng)力性能方面的研究主要集中在成橋階段,主要集中在動(dòng)力特性與抗震性能方面。本文以鄭萬(wàn)128m尼爾森體系系桿拱橋?yàn)楸尘?針對(duì)該橋梁施工周期長(zhǎng),而處于施工期的橋梁整體性不強(qiáng)、承載力較弱這一方面問(wèn)題,具體探討了系桿拱橋施工階段動(dòng)力特性與抗震性能。本文運(yùn)用有限元軟件Midas Civil建立了鄭萬(wàn)鐵路128m尼爾森體系系桿拱橋的有限元模型,運(yùn)用反應(yīng)譜分析方法與時(shí)程分析方法,對(duì)大橋成橋階段的動(dòng)力特性與抗震性能進(jìn)行了分析,評(píng)述了該橋成橋狀態(tài)的抗震性能。其次,針對(duì)該橋技術(shù)含量高、建設(shè)周期長(zhǎng)的特點(diǎn),選用下承式系桿拱橋“先梁后拱”與“先拱后梁”兩種施工方法。分別進(jìn)行了橋梁施工各個(gè)階段的具體劃分與建模,運(yùn)用反應(yīng)譜分析方法與時(shí)程分析方法對(duì)處于施工期的鋼管混凝土系桿拱橋進(jìn)行了地震相應(yīng)分析。主要得到了以下結(jié)論:(1)本文實(shí)例系桿拱橋的振動(dòng)基頻為0.72Hz,對(duì)應(yīng)的振型為拱肋橫向?qū)ΨQ彎曲。這表明該橋結(jié)構(gòu)剛度較好。在三向震動(dòng)輸入的情況下,每一方向震動(dòng)輸入對(duì)應(yīng)橋梁結(jié)構(gòu)位移的主要方向。每一方向震動(dòng)輸入,對(duì)橋梁結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的內(nèi)力主要作用不同。在順橋向震動(dòng)輸入情況下,拱頂?shù)淖畲髴?yīng)力值最大。在橫橋向震動(dòng)輸入情況下,最大應(yīng)力值遠(yuǎn)大于其它兩個(gè)方向震動(dòng)輸入所引起的應(yīng)力值,拱上應(yīng)力由拱腳向拱頂遞減,系梁應(yīng)力由梁端向跨中增大。(2)對(duì)系桿拱橋按“先梁后拱”與“先拱后梁”施工方法進(jìn)行了施工階段反應(yīng)譜分析與時(shí)程分析結(jié)果進(jìn)行了比較分析,得到“先梁后拱”施工方法在抗震方面整體優(yōu)于“先拱后梁”施工方法。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on the dynamic performance of Nielsen system tied arch bridge is mainly focused on the stage of bridge completion, mainly on the dynamic characteristics and seismic performance. In this paper, taking Zhengwan 128m Nielsen system tied arch bridge as the background, aiming at the long construction period of the bridge, but the bridge in the construction period is not strong integrity, the bearing capacity is weak. The dynamic characteristics and seismic behavior of tied arch bridge during construction are discussed in detail. In this paper, the finite element model of the 128m Nielsen system tied arch bridge of Zhengwan railway is established by using the finite element software Midas Civil. The dynamic characteristics and seismic behavior of the bridge in the stage of completion are analyzed by using the response spectrum analysis method and the time-history analysis method. The seismic behavior of the bridge is reviewed. Secondly, according to the characteristics of the bridge with high technology content and long construction period, two construction methods, "first beam and then arch" and "first arch and then beam", are selected. The concrete division and modeling of each stage of bridge construction are carried out, and the seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tubular tied arch bridge during construction period is carried out by using the response spectrum analysis method and time-history analysis method. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) in this paper, the fundamental frequency of vibration of tied arch bridge is 0.72 Hz, and the corresponding mode is transverse symmetrical bending of arch rib. This indicates that the stiffness of the bridge is better. In the case of three direction vibration input, each direction vibration input corresponds to the main direction of bridge structure displacement. The main effect of vibration input on bridge structure is different. The maximum stress value of the arch is maximum under the condition of the vibration input along the bridge. In the case of transverse bridge vibration input, the maximum stress value is much larger than the stress value caused by the other two directions vibration input, and the stress on the arch decreases from the arch foot to the arch top. The stress of tie beam is increased from the end of beam to the middle of span. (2) the results of response spectrum analysis and time history analysis of tied-arch bridge under the construction method of "first beam and then arch" and "first arch and then beam" are compared and analyzed. It is concluded that the construction method of "first beam and then arch" is better than that of "first arch and then beam" in earthquake resistance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：U441.3;U448.225

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙志軍;;京滬高速鐵路青陽(yáng)港大橋設(shè)計(jì)[J];橋梁建設(shè);2013年03期

2 張永亮;張躍進(jìn);王常峰;;豎向地震動(dòng)對(duì)摩擦擺支座隔震橋梁地震反應(yīng)的影響[J];蘭州交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

3 白玲;;大跨度鋼管混凝土拱橋地震響應(yīng)分析[J];中國(guó)鐵道科學(xué);2008年06期

4 陳興沖;商耀兆;張永亮;夏修身;;高墩大跨度鐵路簡(jiǎn)支鋼桁梁橋的減震性能分析[J];世界地震工程;2008年01期

5 陳寶春;鋼管混凝土拱橋計(jì)算理論研究進(jìn)展[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2003年12期

6 于泳波,劉健新,胡仁東;水平和豎向地震作用下梁橋的地震反應(yīng)分析[J];西安理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

7 陸萍,徐君蘭,顧安邦,吳海軍;橋梁地震危險(xiǎn)性分析的原理和方法[J];重慶交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

8 孫華斌,李樹(shù)東,盛勇;卡爾曼濾波法在系桿拱吊桿張拉施工中的應(yīng)用[J];西安公路交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

9 王鈞利,馬春燕;公路橋梁細(xì)部設(shè)計(jì)施工與抗震性能的分析[J];華東公路;1998年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 云迪;大跨中承式鋼管混凝土拱橋靜力及抗震性能[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 彭慧芳;大跨徑連續(xù)剛構(gòu)橋施工階段風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2012年

2 謝玉娜;橋梁抗震分析中考慮高階振型影響的pushover分析方法[D];湖南大學(xué);2011年

3 袁蔚;大跨度鐵路連續(xù)梁拱組合橋梁抗震計(jì)算研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2010年

4 劉磊;大跨度鋼管混凝土拱橋地震反應(yīng)分析[D];西南交通大學(xué);2009年

5 劉文忠;大跨度鋼管混凝土拱橋地震響應(yīng)分析[D];西南交通大學(xué);2009年

6 李鵬;大跨度系桿拱橋動(dòng)力特性和抗震性能研究[D];東南大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1791991