本文選題：機(jī)動(dòng)性　切入點(diǎn)：公車改革　出處：《現(xiàn)代城市研究》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：機(jī)動(dòng)性與可達(dá)性是城市交通規(guī)劃與設(shè)計(jì)的兩個(gè)重要方面。通常,我們將人們利用各種交通方式出行的權(quán)力及便利性稱為機(jī)動(dòng)性,此前,我們常關(guān)注通勤機(jī)動(dòng)性(如BRT)、商務(wù)機(jī)動(dòng)性(如購(gòu)物班車)和弱勢(shì)群體機(jī)動(dòng)性(如殘疾人出行),但往往忽視了機(jī)動(dòng)性的另一個(gè)重要方面——公務(wù)機(jī)動(dòng)性。"公務(wù)自行車"因涉及綠色出行,同時(shí)又涵蓋公車改革和降低"三公經(jīng)費(fèi)"等老百姓非常關(guān)注的問(wèn)題,在社會(huì)上引發(fā)熱議。論文為探究該公務(wù)出行新方式的可行性,以南京市鼓樓區(qū)政府的公務(wù)自行車為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)公務(wù)人員和普通市民分別進(jìn)行了問(wèn)卷調(diào)查和訪談,對(duì)公務(wù)出行行為進(jìn)行了隨車調(diào)查和出行模擬,并在此基礎(chǔ)上從出行效率、出行成本和碳排放3個(gè)方面對(duì)比了公務(wù)汽車和公務(wù)自行車兩種出行方式。調(diào)查分析結(jié)果充分肯定了公務(wù)自行車的可行性和合理性,但同時(shí)也暴露出了一些問(wèn)題。為了更好地推廣公務(wù)自行車這種合理可行的公務(wù)出行方式,并盡可能將其優(yōu)點(diǎn)放大,進(jìn)而從公共政策調(diào)整、規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)優(yōu)化和社會(huì)觀念引導(dǎo)3個(gè)角度提出改進(jìn)建議。
[Abstract]:Mobility and accessibility are two important aspects of urban traffic planning and design. We often focus on commuting mobility (such as BRTT, business mobility, such as shopping shuttle) and vulnerable groups, such as people with disabilities, but often ignore another important aspect of mobility-official mobility. " "because it involves green travel, At the same time, it also covers such issues as bus reform and the reduction of "three public funds" and other issues that people are very concerned about, which has aroused heated discussion in the society. In order to explore the feasibility of the new way of official travel, Taking the official bicycle of the government of Gulou District in Nanjing as the research object, the paper carries out a questionnaire survey and interview to the public servants and ordinary citizens, carries on the investigation and the travel simulation to the official travel behavior, and on this basis carries on the traveling efficiency. Travel costs and carbon emissions are compared between official vehicles and official bicycles. The results of investigation and analysis fully confirm the feasibility and rationality of official bicycles. But it also exposed some problems. In order to better promote official bicycle as a reasonable and feasible mode of business travel, and maximize its advantages as far as possible, and then adjust public policy, Suggestions for improvement are put forward from three angles of planning and design optimization and social concept guidance.
【作者單位】： 上海天華城市規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)有限公司;南京大學(xué)建筑與城市規(guī)劃學(xué)院;江蘇省城市綜合交通專業(yè)委員會(huì);
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(編號(hào):51308281)
【分類號(hào)】：U491.225

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 羅東群;;試析加強(qiáng)行政事業(yè)單位公務(wù)車安全生產(chǎn)管理及措施[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2013年27期

2 陳永峰;;公務(wù)車駕駛?cè)艘陨碜鲃t[J];安全與健康;2007年12期

3 ;上海市政協(xié)委員建議公務(wù)車統(tǒng)一安裝ETC系統(tǒng)[J];中國(guó)防偽報(bào)道;2011年02期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 齊琳;北京公務(wù)車新限行方案實(shí)施[N];北京商報(bào);2008年

2 記者 徐麗紅;北京公務(wù)車確定限行方案[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2008年

3 易刀;開征擁堵費(fèi)別忘了倫敦的前車之鑒[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2008年

4 實(shí)習(xí)生 陳欣璐邋記者 許琴;能乘公交的,不坐公務(wù)車[N];南京日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

5 狄芳;河北邯鄲公務(wù)車每周少開一天[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2008年

6 本報(bào)記者 李海楠;京城疏堵 公務(wù)車“十二五”零增加[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2011年

7 首席記者 員娟綢;我省公務(wù)車輛出行管理有新規(guī)[N];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

8 羅勝　勝平 小閔 小波;如何監(jiān)管公務(wù)用車？[N];常州日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

9 陳煜儒;公車限行法律依據(jù)充足推行無(wú)羈絆[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

10 本報(bào)記者 張帆;公務(wù)車違規(guī)駕駛 嚴(yán)查嚴(yán)處[N];寶雞日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1564458