本文選題：安全管理工程 + HFACS　； 參考：《安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào)》2017年02期

【摘要】：不安全動(dòng)作的定義、分類(lèi)與識(shí)別尚未有統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn),這給事故分析與預(yù)防帶來(lái)許多困難�；诖�,對(duì)人因分析與分類(lèi)系統(tǒng)(HFACS)和24 Model中的不安全動(dòng)作層面進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究。在不安全動(dòng)作對(duì)應(yīng)方面:HFACS中的不安全動(dòng)作均能對(duì)應(yīng)到24 Model中的不安全動(dòng)作,但HFACS沒(méi)有涉及24 Model中不違章、未引起事故但高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的不安全動(dòng)作,因而無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn)事前預(yù)防。在間接原因?qū)?yīng)方面,HFACS中不安全動(dòng)作的產(chǎn)生原因均可與24 Model中的1個(gè)或多個(gè)間接原因相對(duì)應(yīng);HFACS中不安全動(dòng)作的產(chǎn)生涉及較多生理、心理層面的原因,而考慮到實(shí)用性原則,24 Model暫未給出該兩方面原因的具體分類(lèi)方法。在不安全動(dòng)作發(fā)出者方面:24 Model涉及組織內(nèi)各層級(jí)人員,而HFACS僅指一線(xiàn)員工。在實(shí)際應(yīng)用方面:兩種模型均可用于不安全動(dòng)作原因的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析;24 Model給出的不安全動(dòng)作分類(lèi)范圍較HFACS廣,在事故分析時(shí)所受局限性小,但易造成不安全動(dòng)作遺漏;在用24 Model進(jìn)行不安全動(dòng)作分析時(shí),應(yīng)盡量細(xì)化動(dòng)作分類(lèi)及分析的深入程度,以及動(dòng)作發(fā)出者的員工層級(jí)。
[Abstract]:The definition, classification and recognition of unsafe actions have not yet been standardized, which brings many difficulties to accident analysis and prevention. Based on this, the unsafe action level in human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS) and 24 Model is compared. The unsafe action in the: HFACS can correspond to the unsafe action in the 24 Model, but the unsafe action in the 24 Model is not involved in the HFACS, which does not cause the accident but the unsafe action with high risk, so it can not be prevented beforehand. In terms of indirect cause correspondence, the causes of unsafe action in HFACS can be compared with one or more indirect reasons in 24 Model. The occurrence of unsafe action in HFACS involves more physiological and psychological reasons. However, considering the practical principle, 24 Model does not give a specific classification method for these two reasons. For unsafe action issuers, the: 24 Model involves people at all levels of the organization, while HFACS refers only to frontline employees. In practical application, the two models can be used to analyze the cause of unsafe action. The classification range of unsafe action given by 24 Model is wider than that of HFACS, and the limitation in accident analysis is small, but it is easy to cause the omission of unsafe action. When analyzing unsafe actions with 24 Model, we should try to refine the depth of action classification and analysis, as well as the employee level of the action issuer.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)(北京)資源與安全工程學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目(51534008)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：X928
，

本文編號(hào)：2074136