中國省區(qū)市區(qū)域競爭力新舊方法比較研究
[Abstract]:In this paper, the GDP data of 31 provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions and the whole country from 1997 to 2011 are selected, and the regional competitiveness of each province is analyzed by using the method of data mining. Firstly, the GDP data of 31 provinces and municipalities are divided into three time periods and the regional competitiveness is analyzed by GDP share method. At the same time, the 31 provinces and municipalities are divided into four categories according to the descending order of competitiveness. The analysis shows that the regional competitiveness of Guangdong Province, Shandong Province and Jiangsu Province has always been in the very strong first category, and that of Zhejiang Province, Henan Province, Hebei Province and Liaoning Province has always been in the second category of regional competitiveness. Some of the other three or four categories of provinces, municipalities and cities are not particularly large in classification. Secondly, from the point of view of the primitive method, the national GDP is taken as the basis, and the self-created slope method is used to analyze the regional competitiveness in the three time periods of the GDP data of 31 provinces and municipalities. At the same time, according to the competitiveness of 31 provinces and municipalities are also divided into four categories, the results show that the two methods are basically the same classification of provinces and municipalities. It shows that our innovative explanation for regional competitiveness-fitting slope is feasible. Then, the similarities and differences between the GDP share method and the fitting slope method are summarized. The biggest similarities between the two methods are the same data, the same research object, and the very similar results; The biggest difference is that the data considered by the slope method are more time-comprehensive and the results are more comprehensive. It shows that the slope method has more advantages. Finally, the paper analyzes the time series of the three time periods of 31 provinces and municipalities, analyzes the reasons for the change of the classification of the provinces and municipalities, and points out that the economic transformation is the most important part of our country at present.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:F127;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 左繼宏;胡樹華;;基于對(duì)應(yīng)分析法的我國各省區(qū)域競爭力比較[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年20期
2 戴可人;;基于Theil系數(shù)的成都空間發(fā)展差異分析[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期
3 單玉麗,張旭華,蘇美祥;福州與廈門、東莞、蘇州區(qū)域競爭力比較分析及對(duì)策研究[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期
4 楊大利;改革以來中國省內(nèi)地區(qū)差異的變遷[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);1995年01期
5 范劍勇,朱國林;中國地區(qū)差距演變及其結(jié)構(gòu)分解[J];管理世界;2002年07期
6 賀燦飛,梁進(jìn)社;中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異的時(shí)空變化:市場(chǎng)化、全球化與城市化[J];管理世界;2004年08期
7 鄒薇;周浩;;中國省際增長差異的源泉的測(cè)算與分析(1978~2002)——基于“反事實(shí)”收入法的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];管理世界;2007年07期
8 張旺鋒,馮宗周;西北五省區(qū)區(qū)域競爭力比較分析[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期
9 吳愛芝;楊開忠;李國平;;中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異變動(dòng)的研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2011年05期
10 鄭會(huì)軍;馬文杰;;基于主成分分析的農(nóng)業(yè)區(qū)域競爭力評(píng)價(jià)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2009年05期
本文編號(hào):2378200
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2378200.html