中國城市低保制度的減貧與再分配效應(yīng)研究
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, in order to alleviate the social impact caused by economic transformation and ensure the basic life of laid-off and unemployed people, the minimum living security system came into being, which constituted the last "defense line" for urban residents. After nearly 20 years of development, a new social assistance system with the minimum living security system as the core was initially formed. At the same time, China has successfully stepped into the middle-income countries from a low-income country with backward economic development and weak fiscal base. As the reform moves to a higher stage, the contradictions and conflicts accumulated during the transition period and the social problems brought about by the economic development have erupted, which have strongly impacted the existing system and reformed the system in China. Advancing is difficult.
Facing the imbalance of benefit distribution and urban poverty, the social relief system aiming at helping the poor and the dangerous is pushed to the forefront of system construction. Based on the above background, this paper chooses the urban minimum living security system in the social relief system as the research object, focusing on its poverty reduction effect and income redistribution effect. This paper is divided into five parts in general.
The first part mainly elaborates the theoretical basis, the emergence and development of the social assistance system, as well as the nature, content and function of the minimum living security system.
The second part firstly introduces the establishment and development of the urban low-income insurance system in China, and focuses on the policy analysis of the target targeting and guarantee standard links of the system. The results show that the health status of the head of household is poor, without spouse, going to the countryside, unemployed, needing to pay medical expenses by oneself, the number of employed people in the family is large, the per capita disposable income of the family before receiving the low-income insurance assistance is low, the market estimated present value of household durable goods is low, the per capita disposable income of the city in which the family is located is high, and living in the central and western regions is Increasing the probability of families getting low-income insurance assistance is also the main factor affecting the aim of urban low-income insurance.
In the policy analysis of the urban minimum living standard, this paper first examines the influencing factors of the urban minimum living standard from the empirical point of view. In the western region, the government's financial power is the decisive factor of the standard of urban minimum living standard.
In the evaluation of the nominal minimum living standard, this paper finds that the nominal minimum living standard of cities in China increased year by year from 2004 to 2011, with an average annual growth rate of 9.60%; the nominal minimum living standard of cities in the eastern region is obviously higher than that in the central and Western regions, and the nominal minimum living standard growth rate of cities in the western region is higher than that in the eastern region in most years. From the point of view of the regional disparity of nominal subsistence allowance standard, the disparity of urban subsistence allowance standard within the eastern region is the biggest, and the disparity of urban subsistence allowance standard within the region is slightly higher than that between regions.
According to the anti-poverty ability to assess the actual minimum standard of living, this paper finds that the actual minimum standard of living in China's cities has shown a downward trend in terms of either alleviating absolute poverty or alleviating relative poverty; the provinces with relatively strong ability to alleviate absolute poverty and relative poverty are mainly concentrated in the eastern part of China. From the two aspects of meeting the social anti-poverty demand and the burden of low-income insurance expenditure, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of the actual low-income insurance standard, and draws the conclusion that Tibet, Jiangxi, Hebei and other provinces have relatively strong anti-poverty ability and relatively low-income insurance expenditure burden. In heavy areas, the central government needs to continue to increase the financial input of urban minimum living standard; Gansu, Guangxi, Henan and other provinces are relatively weak in anti-poverty ability of urban minimum living standard, and the burden of low living standard expenditure is relatively heavy. Increasing fiscal transfer payment by the central government will be conducive to the improvement of urban minimum living standard in these areas. Fujian, Shanghai and other provinces and municipalities have relatively weak anti-poverty ability and relatively light burden of low-income insurance expenditure. The above-mentioned areas can improve the anti-poverty ability of low-income insurance as long as they reposition the urban low-income insurance system so as to make the security standards compatible with the living needs of residents and economic growth. Beijing, Tianjin, Zhejiang and other provinces and municipalities can improve the anti-poverty ability of low-income insurance. The urban minimum insurance standard has not only a good anti-poverty ability, but also a relatively light burden of the minimum insurance expenditure. Therefore, the above-mentioned areas have the possibility to further improve the security standard.
The third part is the policy effect evaluation. This paper uses the urban data of China Household Income Project (CHIP) 2002 and 2007 to measure the poverty reduction effect and income redistribution effect of urban minimum living allowance in China. The policy orientation is mainly to help families with more serious poverty alleviate poverty, not to make them completely out of poverty. Urban minimum living allowance has played a certain role in narrowing the income gap, but the role is relatively weak, especially in the eastern region, the use of urban minimum living allowance to achieve income redistribution, obviously lagging behind the middle and Western regions.
According to the regional measurement of the poverty reduction effect of urban minimum living allowance, this paper finds that in 2002, the areas with the strongest ability of urban minimum living allowance and poverty reduction are all Chongqing, and the areas with the weakest ability of poverty reduction are all Beijing, Jiangsu, Henan and Sichuan. In 2007, under the absolute poverty line, the urban minimum living allowance and poverty reduction ability is the strongest. Anhui and Chongqing have the weakest ability to reduce poverty, while Henan, Hubei, Chongqing and Sichuan have the strongest ability to reduce poverty under the relative poverty line. Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong have the weakest ability to reduce poverty. Under the absolute poverty line, female-headed households and three-person households benefit the most from the basic social security assistance; under the relative poverty line, unemployed households and disabled households benefit the most from the basic social security assistance. Below, households with disabled families, single family members and household unemployed families benefit most from the minimum allowances.
Measuring the income redistribution effect of urban minimum living allowance according to the region, the results show that in 2002, the income redistribution effect of urban minimum living allowance in Chongqing and Gansu provinces and cities in Western China was stronger, while that of Beijing, Jiangsu and Guangdong provinces and cities in eastern China did not produce significant income redistribution effect. Two central provinces and cities in Henan Province have played a strong role in income redistribution, and four eastern provinces and cities in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Shanghai and Jiangsu Province have produced less income redistribution effect. In 2007, the income gap of disabled households, single households and unemployed households headed by low-income insurance assistance decreased greatly.
The fourth part is the policy simulation. Because the urban minimum living allowance belongs to the local policy, this paper chooses Tianjin as a case to carry on the policy simulation. The simulation results show that: in 2007 and 2008, as long as the existing security standards to achieve low protection coverage, effective payment of security benefits, excluding families not qualified for low living allowance, Tianjin City Under the above conditions, although it is still impossible to reduce the relative poverty rate, the relative poverty depth and intensity, as well as income inequality will be significantly improved.
The fifth part puts forward policy suggestions on the future development of China's urban minimum living security system from the aspects of the identification of the security objects, the setting of the security standards, the supply of funds and the management of the security objects.
The innovations of this paper are as follows: Firstly, this paper uses several poverty lines to measure the poverty reduction effect of China's urban minimum living insurance system. Secondly, this paper uses a variety of income distribution indicators to measure the income redistribution effect of China's urban minimum living security system. This paper finds that the most effective way to reduce poverty and redistribute income is to raise the security standard appropriately under the condition that the insurance should be guaranteed to the full extent and the security fund should be paid effectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南開大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F124.7;D632.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張世偉;萬相昱;;個人所得稅制度的收入分配效應(yīng)——基于微觀模擬的研究途徑[J];財經(jīng)科學(xué);2008年02期
2 高云虹;劉強;;收入增長和收入分配對城市減貧的影響[J];財經(jīng)科學(xué);2011年12期
3 路錦非;曹艷春;;支出型貧困家庭致貧因素的微觀視角分析和救助機制研究[J];財貿(mào)研究;2011年02期
4 高清輝;;中國城市最低生活保障標準的比較與評價[J];城市問題;2008年06期
5 李春根;賴志杰;;論城鄉(xiāng)一體化社會救助體系的構(gòu)建[J];財政研究;2010年03期
6 陳建東;馬驍;秦芹;;最低生活保障制度是否縮小了居民收入差距[J];財政研究;2010年04期
7 曹艷春;;我國城市居民最低生活保障標準動態(tài)變遷實證研究[J];當代財經(jīng);2007年04期
8 羅文英;陳健;傅紅春;;公平性指標:從基尼系數(shù)到收入滿足度差距[J];當代財經(jīng);2007年11期
9 李玲;賈建海;熊林平;龔明星;馬修強;胡克堅;孟虹;;昆明市城鎮(zhèn)職工醫(yī)療保險微觀模擬模型的構(gòu)建[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年09期
10 曹艷春;;我國城市居民最低生活保障標準的影響因素與效應(yīng)研究[J];當代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2007年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 駱勇;發(fā)展型社會政策視角下的城鄉(xiāng)社保一體化問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年
2 王紅兵;我國城鄉(xiāng)最低生活保障制度統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年
3 曲大維;城市貧困救助的福利政策研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
4 王三秀;我國農(nóng)村最低生活救助制度價值目標轉(zhuǎn)型研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號:2242393
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2242393.html