本文選題：開放型經(jīng)濟(jì) + 可持續(xù)發(fā)展　； 參考：《南京航空航天大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)為江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展做出了重大貢獻(xiàn)，但隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境的變化，江蘇以數(shù)量取勝的開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式難以持續(xù)，提升江蘇開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平迫在眉睫。 本文將可持續(xù)發(fā)展的理論應(yīng)用于開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)，從開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)自身可持續(xù)、功能可持續(xù)和環(huán)境可持續(xù)三個(gè)方面詳細(xì)闡述了開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的內(nèi)涵。在此基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合現(xiàn)階段中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平和特點(diǎn)，遵循評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建原則，構(gòu)建了開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，該指標(biāo)體系包括一級(jí)指標(biāo)3個(gè)，二級(jí)指標(biāo)8個(gè)，三級(jí)指標(biāo)36個(gè)。 運(yùn)用改進(jìn)的熵值法，測度了2004-2010年江蘇省開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平，及2010年江蘇省內(nèi)十三個(gè)市和江蘇及與之進(jìn)行比較的六省市的開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平，實(shí)證研究結(jié)果表明：（1）江蘇開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平不斷提升，系統(tǒng)自身可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力呈上升趨勢，，功能可持續(xù)指數(shù)和環(huán)境可持續(xù)指數(shù)呈現(xiàn)出此消彼長的發(fā)展?fàn)顟B(tài)。（2）省內(nèi)各市開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平排名為：蘇州、無錫、常州、南京、南通、鎮(zhèn)江、揚(yáng)州、泰州、連云港、鹽城、徐州、淮安和宿遷。存在的兩個(gè)主要問題是：省內(nèi)開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平地區(qū)差異明顯、開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境不協(xié)調(diào)。（3）江蘇及與之進(jìn)行比較的六省市開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平由高到低依次是：上海、北京、廣東、江蘇、浙江、福建和山東。江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會(huì)效益水平較低導(dǎo)致功能可持續(xù)水平較低。環(huán)境承載力水平較低，導(dǎo)致環(huán)境可持續(xù)能力一般。 最后基于研究結(jié)論，提出了促進(jìn)江蘇開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平提升的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:The open economy has made great contributions to the rapid development of Jiangsu's economy. However, with the change of the world economic environment, the development model of Jiangsu's open economy, which has won by quantity, is not sustainable. It is urgent to upgrade the level of sustainable development of Jiangsu's open economy. In this paper, the theory of sustainable development is applied to open economy, and the connotation of sustainable development of open economy is expounded in detail from three aspects: sustainable of open economy system itself, functional sustainability and environmental sustainability. On this basis, combined with the level and characteristics of China's economic development at the present stage, and following the principles of constructing an evaluation index system, an evaluation index system for the level of sustainable development of an open economy is constructed. The index system consists of three first-grade indicators. The second grade index is 8, the third grade index is 36. By using the improved entropy method, this paper measures the sustainable development level of open economy in Jiangsu Province from 2004 to 2010, and the sustainable development level of open economy in 13 cities in Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Province in 2010, and six provinces and cities compared with the level of sustainable development of open economy in Jiangsu Province. The empirical results show that the sustainable development level of Jiangsu's open economy is increasing, and the sustainable development ability of the system itself is on the rise. Functional Sustainability Index (FSI) and Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) are ranked as follows: Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Nanjing, Nantong, Zhenjiang, Yangzhou, Taizhou, Lianyungang. Yancheng, Xuzhou, Huai'an and Suqian. The two main problems are: the regional differences in the level of sustainable development of the open economy in the province are obvious. The sustainable development level of open economy in Jiangsu Province and the six provinces compared with it is: Shanghai, Beijing, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian and Shandong. The low level of economic and social benefits in Jiangsu leads to a low level of functional sustainability. The level of environmental carrying capacity is low, resulting in general environmental sustainability. Finally, based on the conclusion of the research, the countermeasures and suggestions to promote the sustainable development level of Jiangsu open economy are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京航空航天大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉朝明,韋海鳴;對(duì)外開放的度量方法與模型分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2001年02期

2 應(yīng)健,張國林;經(jīng)濟(jì)開放度及其度量方法研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2002年10期

3 范良;經(jīng)濟(jì)開放度與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于VAR方法對(duì)中國的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2005年11期

4 陳輝;牛叔文;;西部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)開放度評(píng)價(jià)及比較研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2010年10期

5 吳園一;中國經(jīng)濟(jì)開放度選擇及指標(biāo)體系[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;1998年01期

6 胡慶江;王澤寰;;基于層次分析法的沿海五省對(duì)外貿(mào)易可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];國際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

7 王奇,葉文虎;代內(nèi)公平、國際貿(mào)易與可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2001年03期

8 陳子曦;;中國各省市區(qū)開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)水平比較研究[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2010年05期

9 蔡愛軍;朱傳耿;仇方道;;我國開放型經(jīng)濟(jì)研究進(jìn)展及展望[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2011年02期

10 曹斌;林劍藝;崔勝輝;;可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究綜述[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與技術(shù);2010年03期

本文編號(hào)：2045796