本文選題：市場分割　切入點：經(jīng)濟增長　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國商品市場分割與經(jīng)濟增長的關(guān)系在實證上仍是一個有待求證的問題。本文首先綜合回顧了國內(nèi)外關(guān)于市場分割程度的度量方法,然后相互比較選擇了最佳度量市場分割程度的相對價格法,計算出我國2001-2011年分省市、東中西部和全國整體市場三個層面的市場分割指數(shù),在這三個層面上分析比較我國市場分割程度的變化趨勢。其次,將我國2001-2011年間整體市場的市場分割指數(shù)納入到經(jīng)濟增長的計量實證模型中,考察市場分割程度對我國經(jīng)濟增長的實證影響。計量結(jié)果得出,市場分割與我國經(jīng)濟增長的關(guān)系是非線性的,在我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平較低時,程度較輕的市場分割能夠促進經(jīng)濟的增長,但隨著經(jīng)濟的進一步增長,市場分割阻礙經(jīng)濟增長的作用會越來越顯著。把表示對內(nèi)改革的非國有化變量和表示對外開放的外貿(mào)依存度變量引入實證模型來分析其對市場分割的影響后,發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩個變量都能夠通過降低市場分割程度,進而對經(jīng)濟增長具有正向效應(yīng)。也就是我國的對內(nèi)改革和對外開放能夠降低市場分割程度,促進經(jīng)濟增長的作用。在此基礎(chǔ)之上,本文提出了降低我國市場分割程度,促進經(jīng)濟增長的政策含義是：隨著我國經(jīng)濟經(jīng)過了改革開放后的幾十年高速的發(fā)展,市場分割對于經(jīng)濟增長的正效應(yīng)階段已經(jīng)過去,而其負(fù)效應(yīng)越來越強烈。在改革開放的大背景下,為了減小我國的市場分割程度,將其對經(jīng)濟增長的阻礙作用限制在最小的范圍內(nèi),首先必須轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能,盡量減小政府行政干預(yù)經(jīng)濟生產(chǎn)生活,做好市場經(jīng)濟的“守夜人”、市場經(jīng)濟規(guī)則的制定者和裁判員,確保市場經(jīng)濟各微觀經(jīng)濟主體公平合法地參與競爭；同時也應(yīng)該堅定不移的深化對內(nèi)改革,健全中國特色的社會主義市場經(jīng)濟體制；此外還應(yīng)該繼續(xù)多方面、全方位地擴大開放,其中關(guān)鍵就是要提升我國對外開放的質(zhì)量和效益,提升我國出口產(chǎn)品的高科技和高附加值含量,發(fā)展資源消耗少,環(huán)境污染小的產(chǎn)業(yè)。這也正是我國經(jīng)濟持續(xù)健康穩(wěn)定增長的希望之所在。
[Abstract]:The relationship between commodity market segmentation and economic growth in China is still an issue to be verified empirically. Then, we choose the best relative price method to measure the market segmentation degree, and calculate the market segmentation index of China from 2001 to 2011 at three levels: provinces, cities, east, west, west and the whole country. This paper analyzes and compares the trend of market segmentation in China at these three levels. Secondly, the market segmentation index of the whole market in China from 2001 to 2011 is incorporated into the econometric empirical model of economic growth. The empirical results show that the relationship between market segmentation and China's economic growth is nonlinear, and when the level of economic development in China is low, the relationship between market segmentation and economic growth is nonlinear. A lesser degree of market segmentation can boost economic growth, but as the economy grows further, The effect of market segmentation on economic growth will become more and more significant. After introducing the variables of denationalization of internal reform and foreign trade dependence on opening up to the outside world to analyze its impact on market segmentation, It is found that both of these variables can reduce the degree of market segmentation and thus have a positive effect on economic growth. That is, China's internal reform and opening to the outside world can reduce the degree of market segmentation. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward the policy meaning of reducing the degree of market segmentation and promoting economic growth: with the rapid development of China's economy after decades of reform and opening up, The positive effect of market segmentation on economic growth has passed, and its negative effect is becoming more and more intense. In order to reduce the market segmentation in China under the background of reform and opening up, To limit its hindrance to economic growth within the minimum scope, we must first change the functions of the government, minimize government administrative interference in economic production and life, and be the "night-watchmen" of the market economy, the makers and referees of the rules of the market economy. To ensure that all microeconomic subjects of the market economy participate in competition fairly and legally; at the same time, they should unswervingly deepen domestic reforms and improve the socialist market economic system with Chinese characteristics; in addition, they should continue to do so in many ways. The key to opening wider to the outside world is to improve the quality and efficiency of our country's opening to the outside world, to enhance the high technology and high value-added content of our export products, and to reduce the consumption of development resources. Environmental pollution is a small industry. This is the hope of sustained, healthy and stable economic growth in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F124.1;F723

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊元澤;趙會玉;;地方政府競爭提高了經(jīng)濟效率么?——基于省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 劉培林;地方保護和市場分割的損失[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2005年04期

3 周叔蓮,魏后凱;21世紀(jì)我國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟開發(fā)戰(zhàn)略[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2000年02期

4 林泉;;民營企業(yè)的成長上限及克服[J];經(jīng)濟管理;2002年03期

5 白永秀,吳航;我國基本經(jīng)濟制度下非公有制經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展前景[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2003年02期

6 陳敏;桂琦寒;陸銘;陳釗;;中國經(jīng)濟增長如何持續(xù)發(fā)揮規(guī)模效應(yīng)?——經(jīng)濟開放與國內(nèi)商品市場分割的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2008年01期

7 吳意云;朱希偉;;接入效應(yīng)、市場分割與商品交易市場發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2012年01期

8 銀溫泉,才婉茹;我國地方市場分割的成因和治理[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2001年06期

9 白重恩,杜穎娟,陶志剛,仝月婷;地方保護主義及產(chǎn)業(yè)地區(qū)集中度的決定因素和變動趨勢[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2004年04期

10 周黎安;晉升博弈中政府官員的激勵與合作——兼論我國地方保護主義和重復(fù)建設(shè)問題長期存在的原因[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2004年06期

，

本文編號：1672362