【摘要】：明清時(shí)期,松江府城雖在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化影響力上遜于蘇州、杭州、南京等大都市,但在江南普通府縣城市中具有突出的代表性。從宋代以來(lái),松江的城市建成區(qū)已形成沿秀州塘-南俞塘線型延伸的格局,歷明、清至近代而不變,體現(xiàn)出典型的有機(jī)生長(zhǎng)形態(tài)。明清時(shí)期的松江城一度有過(guò)發(fā)達(dá)的手工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì),并且一直具有區(qū)域貿(mào)易中心的地位,即使在近代上海興起之后,其商業(yè)市容仍頗為繁榮。過(guò)去中國(guó)城市史的研究中,傾向于將行政治所城市視為處于國(guó)家嚴(yán)密控制之下規(guī)劃嚴(yán)整而工商業(yè)性格缺乏的單一“政治城市”。細(xì)致的實(shí)證分析顯示,這種簡(jiǎn)單化的解釋框架無(wú)法涵蓋以松江為代表的明清江南府縣城市。
[Abstract]:During the Ming and Qing dynasties, Songjiang Fucheng was inferior to Suzhou, Hangzhou and Nanjing in its political, economic and cultural influence, but it had outstanding representativeness in ordinary prefectural cities in the south of the Yangtze River. Since the Song Dynasty, the urban built-up area of Songjiang River has formed a pattern of extending along Xiuzhou Tang-Nanyu Tang line, which remained unchanged from Ming Dynasty to modern times, reflecting a typical organic growth form. Songjiang City in Ming and Qing dynasties once had a developed handicraft economy, and has always had the status of a regional trade center, even after the rise of modern Shanghai, its commercial city is still quite prosperous. In the past, the study of urban history in China tends to regard the city of politics as a single "political city" with strict planning and lack of industrial and commercial character under the strict control of the state. Detailed empirical analysis shows that this simplified interpretation framework can not cover the Mingqing River Nanfu County city represented by Songjiang.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】：K248

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 通訊員 松訊;松江城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)對(duì)幫扶共建促發(fā)展[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2011年

2 通訊員 朱國(guó)華;松江區(qū)積極治理“三亂”頑癥[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2007年

3 陳軍康 記者 薄小波;26個(gè)興趣社放飛學(xué)生心靈[N];文匯報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王冠;松江城洋房項(xiàng)目營(yíng)銷策略研究[D];河北工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2480714