【摘要】：處于轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國(guó),在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、文化等各個(gè)方面正發(fā)生著深刻且重大的變化。正如社會(huì)學(xué)家貝克所描述的,中國(guó)已經(jīng)進(jìn)入了“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)”。環(huán)境沖突成為轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和生態(tài)保護(hù)相博弈的產(chǎn)物。近年,由于片面追求GDP的高速增長(zhǎng)、合法的環(huán)境利益訴求渠道不暢等原因,導(dǎo)致環(huán)境沖突問(wèn)題在數(shù)量上處于逐年上升的狀態(tài)。治理環(huán)境沖突已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)管理的重要任務(wù)之一。但是,環(huán)境沖突的治理還存在治理主體單一化、治理偏重短期效應(yīng)、法制保障不足、問(wèn)責(zé)陷入兩難等種種困境,需要尋找破解治理困境的路徑。突破環(huán)境沖突治理的困境,不但要增加治理主體的多元化,更應(yīng)準(zhǔn)確定位政府在環(huán)境沖突治理中的角色;以環(huán)境沖突預(yù)防為先導(dǎo),沖突控制與沖突化解相互配合,以沖突轉(zhuǎn)化為治理目標(biāo);完善既有法律和法規(guī),發(fā)展環(huán)境公益訴訟制度;從物質(zhì)和精神兩個(gè)層面上做好安撫工作,嚴(yán)肅懲治相關(guān)責(zé)任人;構(gòu)建沖突治理的事后評(píng)價(jià)體系,防止環(huán)境沖突的復(fù)發(fā),為類似的環(huán)境沖突治理提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:In the transition period, China is undergoing profound and significant changes in politics, economy, society and culture. As sociologist Baker describes, China has entered a "risk society." Environmental conflict has become the outcome of the game between economic development and ecological protection in China during the transition period. In recent years, due to the one-sided pursuit of the rapid growth of GDP and the lack of channels for legitimate environmental interests, the number of environmental conflicts has increased year by year. Managing environmental conflicts has become one of the important tasks of contemporary Chinese social management. However, the governance of environmental conflict still has some difficulties, such as the simplification of the main body of governance, the emphasis on short-term effect of governance, the lack of legal protection, the dilemma of accountability, and so on, so it is necessary to find a way to solve the dilemma of governance. To break through the plight of environmental conflict management, we should not only increase the diversity of governance subjects, but also accurately position the role of the government in environmental conflict management, take environmental conflict prevention as the forerunner, and coordinate conflict control with conflict resolution. Transform conflict into governance goal; perfect existing laws and regulations, develop environmental public interest litigation system; do a good job of appeasing work from the material and spiritual levels, seriously punish those responsible; build conflict governance post-evaluation system, Prevent the recurrence of environmental conflict and provide reference for similar environmental conflict management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：X321

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙闖;黃粹;;環(huán)境沖突與集群行為——環(huán)境群體性沖突的社會(huì)政治分析[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

2 吳真;;環(huán)境沖突的協(xié)商解決機(jī)制分析[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2014年04期

3 嚴(yán)燕;馮緒猛;;“環(huán)境沖突”的理論省察[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2014年04期

4 張曉燕;;地方政府應(yīng)對(duì)環(huán)境群體性事件的困境及對(duì)策[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2014年04期

5 嚴(yán)燕;劉祖云;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論范式下中國(guó)“環(huán)境沖突”問(wèn)題及其協(xié)同治理[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

6 張良橋;;協(xié)調(diào)博弈理論研究新進(jìn)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)前沿;2009年04期

7 于建嶸;;當(dāng)前農(nóng)村環(huán)境污染沖突的主要特征及對(duì)策[J];世界環(huán)境;2008年01期

8 吳真;;企業(yè)環(huán)境責(zé)任確立的正當(dāng)性分析——以可持續(xù)發(fā)展理念為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年05期

9 趙汀陽(yáng);博弈問(wèn)題的哲學(xué)分析[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張向和;垃圾處理場(chǎng)的鄰避效應(yīng)及其社會(huì)沖突解決機(jī)制的研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

2 李瓊;沖突的構(gòu)成及其邊界[D];上海大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 史杰;環(huán)境群體性事件的治理模式轉(zhuǎn)型[D];南京大學(xué);2013年

2 匡武英;群體性事件問(wèn)題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2186630