發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-23 15:40

  本文選題：當(dāng)代中國 + 民主制度��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：制度化是政治發(fā)展的基本取向和特征之一，是觀察和評(píng)價(jià)政治制度與社會(huì)關(guān)系的一個(gè)重要視角，意味著一系列的政治價(jià)值在多大程度上為社會(huì)所接受、認(rèn)可從而凝練成為日常的行為規(guī)則。①在中國特色社會(huì)主義民主政治進(jìn)程中，選舉民主與協(xié)商民主作為人民民主的兩種基本實(shí)現(xiàn)形式，通過不同的政治優(yōu)勢(shì)和政治功能表現(xiàn)出了共同與共通的政治價(jià)值和政治目標(biāo)，體現(xiàn)了黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、人民當(dāng)家作主、依法治國的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。在當(dāng)代中國，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度的基本理念貫穿于社會(huì)主義民主政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與社會(huì)建設(shè)進(jìn)程之中，通過協(xié)商機(jī)制與利益制約機(jī)制鼓勵(lì)公民平等、理性、公正的政治民主與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)事務(wù)參與，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)公平正義與公共利益最大化。進(jìn)入新的發(fā)展時(shí)期，改革開放進(jìn)程逐步深入，社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)進(jìn)程不斷加快，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度必須要與客觀變化著的中國具體實(shí)際相結(jié)合，在與時(shí)俱進(jìn)中保持自身的動(dòng)態(tài)化過程，在動(dòng)態(tài)化過程中展現(xiàn)自身的功能與價(jià)值。因此，，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主“制度化”不僅是理論自身的內(nèi)在要求，而且也是實(shí)踐的客觀需要。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分：當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化概述。本部分從社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度化的基本概念、價(jià)值取向、實(shí)現(xiàn)形式入手，探究了當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化的內(nèi)涵，在此基礎(chǔ)上，闡述了當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化所具備的實(shí)踐性、真實(shí)性、包容性等特征。具體到中國政治發(fā)展中，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度化建設(shè)具有堅(jiān)持中國特色社會(huì)主義政治發(fā)展道路、推進(jìn)政治體制改革以促進(jìn)政治體制結(jié)構(gòu)合理化、健全社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度以及擴(kuò)大公民的有序政治參與等價(jià)值和功能。 第二部分：當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主形態(tài)的歷史流變。本部分從歷史發(fā)展的角度，考察了協(xié)商民主思想與實(shí)踐在新民主主義革命時(shí)期的早期探索，社會(huì)主義改造和社會(huì)主義建設(shè)時(shí)期的初期發(fā)展以及“文革”期間所遭受的重大挫折。改革開放之后，協(xié)商民主思想與實(shí)踐浴火重生，進(jìn)入了快速發(fā)展的歷史新時(shí)期，尤其是近些年來，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主廣泛化、多層化、制度化發(fā)展進(jìn)程不斷加快。中國特色協(xié)商民主思想在各個(gè)歷史時(shí)期通過實(shí)踐形態(tài)、理論形態(tài)、制度形態(tài)三者的結(jié)合轉(zhuǎn)換，開創(chuàng)著中國民主政治與社會(huì)發(fā)展的新篇章。 第三部分：當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化的現(xiàn)狀。本部分從正反兩個(gè)方面來認(rèn)識(shí)當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化的現(xiàn)狀。一方面，充分認(rèn)識(shí)到協(xié)商民主這一民主形式在中國民主政治進(jìn)程中的作用，社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度化建設(shè)在中國共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的多黨合作和政治協(xié)商制度、社會(huì)協(xié)商對(duì)話制度、基層民主協(xié)商制度以及構(gòu)建協(xié)商民主制度體系等方面取得了重大成就；另一方面，充分認(rèn)識(shí)到社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度化的共識(shí)性有待提高，協(xié)商民主制度的法制化、規(guī)范化、程序化建設(shè)進(jìn)程仍需推進(jìn)，協(xié)商民主制度化的渠道和平臺(tái)有待拓展，推動(dòng)協(xié)商民主制度化的動(dòng)態(tài)機(jī)制仍需完善等問題。 第四部分：當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化建設(shè)的路徑。本部分從培育公民對(duì)協(xié)商民主思想的價(jià)值認(rèn)同，擴(kuò)大協(xié)商民主制度化的主體、對(duì)象和范圍，推動(dòng)協(xié)商民主制度的法制化、規(guī)范化和程序化，完善協(xié)商民主制度化運(yùn)行結(jié)構(gòu)與協(xié)商民主渠道和平臺(tái)，探索協(xié)商民主制度化的運(yùn)行機(jī)制和實(shí)現(xiàn)形式，保持協(xié)商民主制度化的動(dòng)態(tài)化過程六個(gè)方面探索了當(dāng)代中國協(xié)商民主制度化的路徑。這其中，最根本的一項(xiàng)就是要保持其制度建設(shè)的動(dòng)態(tài)化過程，這也是社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主制度化的客觀要求和根本特性。
[Abstract]:Institutionalization is one of the basic orientations and features of political development. It is an important angle of view to observe and evaluate the relationship between political system and society, which means a series of political values are accepted by the society to what extent, and thus be recognized and become daily rules of behavior. (1) electoral people in the process of socialist democratic politics in China's characteristics. As the two basic realization forms of the people's democracy, the master and the consultative democracy show the common and common political and political goals through different political and political functions. It embodies the leadership of the party, the people as the master and the organic unity of governing the country according to law. In the process of socialist democracy, economic development and social construction, through consultation mechanism and interest restriction mechanism, the citizens are encouraged to participate in equal, rational and fair political democracy and economic and social affairs, so as to achieve the maximization of social justice and public interests. The process of socialist modernization is accelerating, and the socialist negotiated democracy must be combined with the specific reality of China, maintaining its own dynamic process with the times and displaying its own functions and values in the dynamic process. Therefore, the "institutionalization" of the socialistic consultative democracy is not only the theory itself. The inherent requirement of the practice is also the objective requirement of practice.
This article is divided into four parts:
The first part is an overview of the institutionalization of contemporary China's consultative democracy. This part, starting with the basic concepts, value orientation and realization forms of the socialist negotiated democratic institutionalization, explores the connotation of the institutionalization of consultative democracy in contemporary China, and on this basis, expounds the practicality, authenticity and inclusiveness of the contemporary China's consultative democratic institutionalization. In the course of political development in China, the construction of socialist negotiated democracy and institutionalization has the value and function of adhering to the socialist political development road with Chinese characteristics, promoting the reform of the political system to promote the rationalization of the political structure, perfecting the socialist democratic system of consultation and expanding the orderly political participation of the public and the people.
The second part: the historical evolution of the democratic form of consultative democracy in contemporary China. From the perspective of historical development, this part examines the early exploration of the thought and practice of consultative democracy in the period of the new democratic revolution, the initial development of socialist transformation and the period of socialist construction, and the major setbacks suffered during the period of the "Cultural Revolution". After that, the deliberative democratic thought and practice reborn and entered a new period of rapid development, especially in recent years. In recent years, the socialist negotiated democracy is widely, multi-layered, and institutionalized, and the process of institutionalized development has been accelerated. The combination of Chinese characteristic consultative democracy through the practice form, the form of theory, and the combination of the three system forms in various historical periods Transformation has opened a new chapter in China's democratic politics and social development.
The third part: the present situation of the institutionalization of consultative democracy in contemporary China. In this part, the present situation of the institutionalization of consultative democracy in contemporary China is recognized from two aspects. On the one hand, it is fully aware of the role of the democratic form of consultative democracy in the process of China's democratic political process, and the construction of the socialist coordination and democratic institutionalization in the leadership of the Communist Party of China The system of multi party cooperation and political consultation, the system of social consultation and dialogue, the Democratic consultative system at the grass-roots level, and the construction of a democratic system of consultative democracy have made great achievements. On the other hand, it is fully realized that the consensus of the Democratic institutionalization of the socialist negotiated democracy needs to be improved, the legal, standardized and procedural construction of the democratic system of consultative democracy is built. The process still needs to be promoted, the channels and platforms for institutionalizing deliberative democracy need to be expanded, and the dynamic mechanism of promoting the institutionalization of deliberative democracy needs to be improved.
The fourth part: the path of the institutionalized construction of democratic consultative democracy in contemporary China. In this part, from cultivating the value identity of the citizen to the democratic thought of consultation, expanding the subject, object and scope of the Democratic institutionalization of consultative democracy, promoting the legalization, standardization and procedure of the democratic system of consultative democracy, perfecting the operational structure of consultative democracy and the Democratic channels of consultation And the platform, exploring the operational mechanism and the form of the institutionalized consultative democracy, and maintaining the dynamic process of the Democratic institutionalization of consultative democracy in six aspects, explore the path of the institutionalization of democratic consultative democracy in contemporary China. Among them, the most fundamental one is to maintain the dynamic process of its system construction, which is also the socialist democratic institutionalization. Objective requirements and fundamental characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D621

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪建昌;;“協(xié)商民主”理論及其在我國的非制度化實(shí)踐[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年05期

2 齊衛(wèi)平;;協(xié)商民主制度與中國特色社會(huì)主義政治發(fā)展[J];桂海論叢;2013年01期

3 王殿宏;;發(fā)揮重要渠道作用 推進(jìn)協(xié)商民主制度化發(fā)展——學(xué)習(xí)貫徹中共十八大精神的一點(diǎn)思考[J];江蘇政協(xié);2013年01期

4 鄒宗根;;基層協(xié)商民主:功能、過程與建構(gòu)[J];中共濟(jì)南市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

5 宋連勝;李建;;社會(huì)主義協(xié)商民主理論源頭探析[J];理論學(xué)刊;2013年03期

6 肖存良;;政黨制度與中國協(xié)商民主研究——基于政權(quán)組織形式的視角[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年02期

7 李景治;;中國協(xié)商民主制度化新進(jìn)程[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

8 陳家剛;;協(xié)商民主中的協(xié)商、共識(shí)與合法性[J];清華法治論衡;2009年01期

9 齊衛(wèi)平;;制度界面的協(xié)商民主形式:多黨合作和政治協(xié)商[J];上海市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

10 莫岳云;張青紅;;中國共產(chǎn)黨協(xié)商民主思想的歷史演進(jìn)[J];馬克思主義研究;2012年07期

本文編號(hào)：1925367