本文選題：《莊子》 + 寓言��； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：對(duì)辯和寓言結(jié)合使用是《莊子》語言的鮮明特點(diǎn)。莊子運(yùn)用語言過程中,善于把握“言”與“不言”的度,既達(dá)到言道說理的目的,又生發(fā)言外之意。 對(duì)辯是在現(xiàn)代文學(xué)對(duì)話理論及中國古代邏輯學(xué)辯對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建的一個(gè)概念,既從文體角度明晰了歷來《莊子》文體類別劃分的混亂,又從語言角度形象地描述了文本對(duì)話的生發(fā)過程。 通過文本內(nèi)容梳理,首次詳細(xì)地羅列出《莊子》的寓言和對(duì)辯使用情況,結(jié)合前人對(duì)《莊子》文本主題內(nèi)容的劃分,嘗試性地將《莊子》的內(nèi)容歸結(jié)為至人無己、神人無功、圣人無名三類。 《莊子》對(duì)辯特色鮮明。對(duì)辯主體的多元、對(duì)辯結(jié)構(gòu)的多樣、對(duì)辯結(jié)語的開放使讀者仿佛置身一個(gè)大的對(duì)話場,從多樣的對(duì)話中,體悟莊子之道。同時(shí),莊子用虛實(shí)相融的手法設(shè)置對(duì)辯,用嚴(yán)密的邏輯思維生發(fā)對(duì)辯,用生動(dòng)的比喻闡釋對(duì)辯,用詩意的語言美化對(duì)辯,使對(duì)辯充滿濃厚的藝術(shù)色彩。 莊子文學(xué)熠熠生輝,戰(zhàn)國諸子散文望其項(xiàng)背。通過與《孟子》、《韓非子》寓言和對(duì)辯的橫向比較分析,凸顯莊子對(duì)寓言和對(duì)辯的駕馭能力。 《莊子》對(duì)辯影響深遠(yuǎn)。于后世文學(xué),影響了宋玉等文人的行文以及對(duì)話體賦和對(duì)辯體文學(xué)的形式特征；于今世,為我們?nèi)绾卧谝粋�(gè)多元價(jià)值時(shí)代開展政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化領(lǐng)域的對(duì)話提供啟示。
[Abstract]:The combination of debate and fable is the distinctive feature of Zhuangzi language. In the process of using language, Zhuangzi is good at grasping the degree of "speech" and "not speaking", which not only achieves the purpose of saying and reasoning, but also gives birth to implication. On the basis of the theory of dialogue in modern literature and the structure of logic in ancient China, the concept of argumentation is constructed, which not only clarifies the confusion of the classification of style in Zhuangzi, but also makes clear from the stylistic point of view. From the perspective of language, the paper vividly describes the process of the development of the text dialogue. Through combing the content of the text, for the first time, a detailed list of the fables of Zhuangzi and the usage of the arguments and arguments are listed in detail. Combining with the division of the subject content of the text of Zhuangzi by predecessors, the content of Zhuangzi is tentatively reduced to that of the most people without self, and the deity and the man have no merit. The saints are unknown. Zhuangzi has distinct characteristics of argument. The diversity of the main body of the debate, the diversity of the structure of the debate, and the opening of the conclusion of the debate make the reader seem to be in a large dialogue field, from the various dialogues, Zhuangzi's way of understanding. At the same time, Zhuangzi sets up the argument with the method of the combination of the false and the real, with strict logical thinking, with vivid metaphor to explain the argument, beautifies the argument with the poetic language, and makes the debate full of rich artistic color. Zhuangzi literature sparkled, and the prose of the warring States period was very popular. By comparing with Mencius, Han Feizi, fables and arguments, Zhuangzi's ability to master fables and arguments is highlighted. Zhuangzi has a profound influence on the debate. The literature of later generations has influenced the writing of Song Yu and the formal characteristics of the literary style of dialogue and argument, and in this world, it provides us with enlightenment on how to carry out the dialogue in the field of politics, economy and culture in a multi-value era.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：I206.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張采民;談?wù)劇肚f子》獨(dú)特的表達(dá)方式[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年02期

2 張惠仁;孟子——我國古代辯對(duì)散文的開元者[J];四川師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1830537