本文關(guān)鍵詞： 第二國(guó)際 帝國(guó)主義 金融資本 資本積累 壟斷　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：第二國(guó)際盧森堡、考茨基、希法亭、伯恩施坦等理論家從不同的理論旨趣出發(fā)，通過(guò)對(duì)資本主義壟斷組織形式、金融資本擴(kuò)張、資本積累實(shí)現(xiàn)、資本主義的組織性和適應(yīng)性等方面進(jìn)行分析，考察了第二國(guó)際時(shí)期帝國(guó)主義的根源、實(shí)質(zhì)、表現(xiàn)形式等，揭示了帝國(guó)主義所具有的壟斷性、排他性、擴(kuò)張性等本質(zhì)特征。 理論家對(duì)資本主義和帝國(guó)主義問(wèn)題的研究和探討，豐富并發(fā)展了馬克思的資本主義批判理論，對(duì)列寧的帝國(guó)主義理論和沃勒斯坦的世界體系理論都產(chǎn)生了深刻的影響。盧森堡將帝國(guó)主義問(wèn)題放在資本主義的歷史發(fā)展中去考察，強(qiáng)調(diào)了非帝國(guó)主義對(duì)于剩余價(jià)值和資本積累實(shí)現(xiàn)的作用和重要性；希法亭探討了卡特爾關(guān)稅、經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)等導(dǎo)致帝國(guó)主義形成的原因，，并回到金融資本的擴(kuò)張性上，對(duì)帝國(guó)主義的形成、擴(kuò)張?zhí)卣鞯确矫孀髁嗽敱M的分析；考茨基探討了國(guó)際分工以及新型工業(yè)資本對(duì)帝國(guó)主義形成的重要作用，并提出了備受爭(zhēng)議的“超帝國(guó)主義”觀點(diǎn)；伯恩施坦企圖通過(guò)對(duì)馬克思關(guān)于資本主義發(fā)展趨勢(shì)理論的修正，主張資本主義的自我適應(yīng)性，從而為帝國(guó)主義辯護(hù)。理論家從不同層面對(duì)帝國(guó)主義問(wèn)題的分析研究，他們的理論觀點(diǎn)透射著時(shí)代氣息和學(xué)理價(jià)值，但是，他們的理論思想也存在著一定的理論不足和局限性，他們忽略了馬克思政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思想中包含的社會(huì)歷史批判內(nèi)涵和人本主義內(nèi)涵，陷入了純粹經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)學(xué)理層面的分析，表現(xiàn)了一種實(shí)證主義傾向，同時(shí)，他們不懂得馬克思的世界歷史思想，將研究帝國(guó)主義的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn)放在了資本主義制度下，忽略了非資本主義國(guó)家、落后民族在帝國(guó)主義形態(tài)下的民族性、自覺(jué)性和自決權(quán)。因此，對(duì)第二國(guó)際理論家帝國(guó)主義理論給予客觀評(píng)價(jià)是一種理論必須。 現(xiàn)階段，我國(guó)處于世界政治經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的國(guó)際環(huán)境下，帝國(guó)主義變換了面目繼續(xù)游蕩在世界體系之中，雖然帝國(guó)主義派生了新的表現(xiàn)形式，但是其實(shí)質(zhì)依然是第二國(guó)際理論家所揭示過(guò)的內(nèi)容。因此，回眸、挖掘第二國(guó)際理論家的帝國(guó)主義思想對(duì)于我國(guó)在世界體系中應(yīng)對(duì)帝國(guó)主義挑戰(zhàn)提供了理論支撐。
[Abstract]:Second International Luxembourg, Kautsky, Hifatin, Bernstein and other theorists from different theoretical interests, through the form of capitalist monopoly organization, financial capital expansion, capital accumulation, This paper analyzes the organization and adaptability of capitalism, investigates the root, essence and manifestation of imperialism in the second international period, and reveals the essential characteristics of imperialism, such as monopoly, exclusiveness, expansibility and so on. The study and discussion of capitalism and imperialism by theorists have enriched and developed Marx's critique of capitalism. It has had a profound impact on Lenin's theory of imperialism and on Wallerstein's theory of the world system. Luxembourg has put the issue of imperialism in the context of the historical development of capitalism. He emphasized the role and importance of non-imperialism in the realization of surplus value and capital accumulation. Hefatin explored the causes of the formation of imperialism, such as cartel tariffs and economic zones, and returned to the expansibility of financial capital. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the formation and expansion characteristics of imperialism, discusses the important role of international division of labor and new industrial capital in the formation of imperialism, and puts forward the controversial viewpoint of "super imperialism". Bernstein attempted to defend imperialism by revising Marx's theory on the development trend of capitalism and advocating the self-adaptability of capitalism. Their theoretical point of view conveys the flavor of the times and the theoretical value, but their theoretical thoughts also have some theoretical shortcomings and limitations. They ignored the connotation of social history criticism and humanism contained in Marx's thought of political economy, fell into the analysis of pure economics, and showed a tendency of positivism, at the same time, They did not understand Marx's idea of world history and placed the starting point and the foothold of the study of imperialism under the capitalist system, ignoring the national character of the non-capitalist countries and the backward nations in the form of imperialism. Therefore, it is necessary to give an objective evaluation of the second international theorist's theory of imperialism. At this stage, our country is in the international environment of world political and economic integration, and imperialism has changed its face and continues to wander in the world system, although imperialism has derived new forms of expression. However, its essence is still the content revealed by the second international theorist. Therefore, looking back, excavating the imperialist thought of the second international theorist provides the theoretical support for our country to deal with the imperialist challenge in the world system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戚洪國(guó);;國(guó)際機(jī)制:美國(guó)霸權(quán)合法性的制度基礎(chǔ)——論羅伯特·基歐漢的霸權(quán)合法性思想[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2010年07期

2 華民;劉佳;吳華麗;;美國(guó)基于美元霸權(quán)的金融“核戰(zhàn)略”與中國(guó)的對(duì)策[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

3 趙景峰;;論壟斷資本國(guó)際化對(duì)國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系的影響[J];粵港澳市場(chǎng)與價(jià)格;2009年09期

4 李瀟瀟;;帝國(guó)主義的新變化與社會(huì)主義的新發(fā)展[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

5 威廉.塔布,吳娓,付強(qiáng);美國(guó)債務(wù)膨脹、經(jīng)濟(jì)泡沫與新帝國(guó)主義[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2006年11期

6 陳人江;;新帝國(guó)主義的特征及可能的反抗方向——評(píng)艾倫·伍德《資本的帝國(guó)》[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2007年03期

7 呂薇洲;;從古典帝國(guó)主義理論到新帝國(guó)主義理論[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2008年09期

8 周穗明;“新帝國(guó)主義論”及其批判述評(píng)[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年03期

9 朱炳元;;用馬克思虛擬資本理論剖析資本主義金融危機(jī)[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2009年08期

10 楊承訓(xùn);;“虛擬—泡沫王國(guó)”:國(guó)際超級(jí)金融壟斷資本——現(xiàn)代資本主義階段性特征[J];思想理論教育導(dǎo)刊;2009年02期

本文編號(hào)：1521101