【摘要】：本文以我國1998—2014年各省份四種所有制企業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)為樣本,將空間因素納入到知識生產(chǎn)函數(shù)中,嘗試性地分析了不同所有制企業(yè)之間的創(chuàng)新溢出大小與邊界。研究結(jié)論顯示:(1)創(chuàng)新溢出具有體制臨近性,即同種所有制企業(yè)之間的創(chuàng)新溢出較大;(2)不同所有制企業(yè)間創(chuàng)新溢出具有非對稱性,民營企業(yè)成為創(chuàng)新溢出的最大吸收方,國有企業(yè)難以獲取其他企業(yè)創(chuàng)新投入的外部性,成為主要溢出方,港澳臺資企業(yè)與外資企業(yè)之間具有"擠占效應(yīng)";(3)就不同所有制企業(yè)創(chuàng)新溢出的邊界而言,國有企業(yè)之間在全國范圍內(nèi)存在溢出效應(yīng),民營企業(yè)間的溢出邊界為1450千米,港澳臺資企業(yè)間、外資企業(yè)間均為1650千米;(4)就不同所有制企業(yè)創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出的影響因素而言,企業(yè)自身的研發(fā)經(jīng)費(fèi)與研發(fā)人員投入仍是創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出的重要保障。本文的研究結(jié)果對當(dāng)前我國創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略、企業(yè)間協(xié)同創(chuàng)新、外商投資政策的改革方向和政策調(diào)整具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Based on the data of four kinds of enterprises under ownership from 1998 to 2014 in China, the spatial factors are incorporated into the knowledge production function, and the size and boundary of innovation spillover between enterprises with different ownership are analyzed tentatively in this paper. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Innovation spillover has institutional proximity, that is, the innovation spillover between enterprises of the same ownership is larger; (2) the innovation spillover among enterprises with different ownership is asymmetric, private enterprises become the biggest absorber of innovation spillover, state-owned enterprises are difficult to obtain the externality of other enterprises' innovation input, and become the main spillovers. Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan-funded enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises have a "crowding effect"; (3) as far as the boundary of innovation spillover of different ownership enterprises is concerned, there exists spillover effect among state-owned enterprises in the whole country, the spillover boundary between private enterprises is 1450 km, between Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises, and between foreign-funded enterprises is 1650 km; (4) in terms of the influencing factors of innovation output of different ownership enterprises, the R & D funds and R & D personnel input of enterprises themselves are still the important guarantee of innovation output. The research results of this paper have certain guiding significance for the innovation driven development strategy, collaborative innovation among enterprises, the reform direction and policy adjustment of foreign investment policy in China.
【作者單位】： 上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)城市與區(qū)域科學(xué)學(xué)院財經(jīng)研究所;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金年度項目“長三角城市群人口空間分布優(yōu)化研究”(15BRK025) 上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)研究生教育創(chuàng)新計劃項目“專業(yè)化、多樣化與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新——基于中國區(qū)域數(shù)據(jù)的空間計量模型分析”(2014110491)
【分類號】：F273.1;F279.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 鄒昭f^;;我國不同所有制企業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新能力的比較研究[J];中國科技投資;2011年06期

2 鄭培敏;;國企效率假象二三例[J];上海國資;2010年06期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 證券時報記者 賈壯;王勇：國企綜合效益不低于其他所有制企業(yè)[N];證券時報;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 邢沖;我國城鎮(zhèn)不同所有制企業(yè)收入差距分析[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2364448