浙江龍盛定增式股權(quán)激勵(lì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)后果研究
[Abstract]:As a long-term incentive mechanism, equity incentive has been widely used in foreign countries. It helps to solve the problem of inconsistent interests arising from the principal-agent problem, that is, shareholders grant equity or options to managers. The interests of managers and shareholders are tied together for a long time, and the maximization of enterprise value and shareholder wealth is realized at the same time. There are many motivations for enterprises to implement equity incentives, which can encourage employees to work hard, create more wealth for enterprises, improve the performance of enterprises, and retain core staff. At the same time, there are some differences in the way of equity incentive, such as stock option, restricted stock and so on. Due to the limitation of the applicable conditions of different incentive modes and the reasons of equity structure and governance structure of listed companies, different ways of equity incentive may have different economic consequences. Any system has its dual character, and so is the equity incentive. It is like a double-edged sword, which can maximize the benefits of management and shareholders, while improper use may make shareholders suffer huge losses. The fixed increase equity incentive is a new kind of equity incentive in recent years. The economic consequences of it are studied in depth, that is, the positive effect on the stock price and enterprise performance, and the possible adverse effects, such as the transmission of benefits, etc. It can be used as a reference for Chinese enterprises to adopt fixed increase equity incentive scheme and to optimize the incentive scheme of listed companies. Based on the motivation of equity incentive in Longsheng, Zhejiang, combining the relevant theory of equity incentive and the actual situation of stock right incentive in Zhejiang, this paper analyzes the influence of equity incentive on enterprise performance and stock price through financial accounting indicators. Combined with the advantages and disadvantages of fixed increase equity incentive, this paper analyzes the consequences of interest transmission, and puts forward some suggestions on the research conclusions. Through the research, the following conclusions are drawn: Zhejiang Longsheng implementation of fixed increase equity incentive to improve the business performance, and the stock price in a short period of time to get a rapid increase; However, due to the imperfect systems and policies related to equity incentive in China, the implementation of fixed increase equity incentive in Longsheng, Zhejiang Province, has resulted in the economic consequences of interest transmission. It is mainly reflected in the high dividends after the implementation of the targeted issuance scheme and the decline after the brief increase in the operating performance, which provides convenience for the large shareholders to seek benefits, and ultimately infringes the interests of the minority shareholders. Based on the above analysis, this paper puts forward the following suggestions: to audit the purpose of non-public issuance of stocks, to perfect the information disclosure mechanism of listed companies, to improve the supervision mechanism to safeguard the interests of minority shareholders, and to perfect the market restraint mechanism of the capital market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:F272.92
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陸宇建;;股權(quán)集中度與公司業(yè)績(jī)的相關(guān)性——評(píng)林長(zhǎng)泉“股權(quán)集中度的決定、變動(dòng)及不同股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的業(yè)績(jī)相關(guān)性”一文[J];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)評(píng)論;2004年02期
2 劉志遠(yuǎn);毛淑珍;樂(lè)國(guó)林;;控股股東對(duì)上市公司股權(quán)集中度影響的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2008年01期
3 韓蔥慧;胡國(guó)柳;;股權(quán)集中度與會(huì)計(jì)信息質(zhì)量相關(guān)性的實(shí)證研究[J];瓊州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期
4 劉華;鄭軍;;高新技術(shù)上市公司股權(quán)激勵(lì)與公司業(yè)績(jī)——基于自主創(chuàng)新的視角[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友(上旬刊);2010年12期
5 李垣;郭海;弋亞群;劉益;;股權(quán)集中度影響產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新與學(xué)習(xí)導(dǎo)向[J];新財(cái)經(jīng);2011年08期
6 石勁磊;中外券商股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)比較研究[J];貴州商專學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期
7 張華,鄢華;企業(yè)股權(quán)集中度的決定因素[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期
8 鄭德s,
本文編號(hào):2361093
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2361093.html