深化國(guó)企改革進(jìn)程中競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中立制度體系構(gòu)建
[Abstract]:Competition can improve the efficiency of enterprises and promote economic prosperity. Therefore, the reform of state-owned enterprises to introduce the competition of private enterprises is the inevitable result of the reform of state-owned enterprises. However, due to the inertia of government behavior, the relationship between state-owned enterprises and the government seems to be difficult to get rid of. The state-owned enterprises often get preferential treatment from the government in some ways. In the face of this problem, it is very important to set up a competitive system in accordance with the characteristics of our country's economic development. Competition in competition refers to the situation in which the government's commercial activities compete with the private enterprises. The enterprises or institutions that carry out the government's commercial activities cannot have a net advantage over the private enterprises because of the nature of the government or the state. The development of China's socialist market economy is guided by the principles of Marxist political economy, so it is also necessary to establish a system in the competition of our country on the basis of Marxist political economy theory. Marxist political economy theory contains abundant competition theory as well as ownership theory, which has profound guiding significance for the construction of the system in the process of deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises. This paper is divided into four major plates to carry out research and analysis: the first plate, the outline of the system of competition. This paper makes a preliminary exposition and analysis of the Marxist theoretical basis of competition neutrality and the basic concept of competition neutrality. The second part is the practical development and comparative analysis of competition neutrality in foreign countries. By comparing and analyzing the practical experience of foreign countries' competition neutrality, this paper provides a reference for the construction of our country's competitive neutral system, and the third part, the achievements and shortcomings of the competition in the process of SOE reform. On the basis of combing the process of introducing competition mechanism into the reform of state-owned enterprises in China, this paper analyzes the achievements and shortcomings of competition neutrality in the process of state-owned enterprise reform. Under the guidance of Marxist competition theory and ownership theory, on the basis of drawing lessons from the practical experience of foreign countries in competition, this paper constructs a competitive neutral system in line with the present situation of the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. This paper holds that in order to perfect the socialist market economic system and promote the deepening of the reform of state-owned enterprises, it is necessary to build a competitive middle system that conforms to the characteristics of our country's economic development. Establishing the basic position of competition policy at the macro policy level and giving play to the decisive role of market resource allocation; At the micro legal level, we should set up a legal mechanism in the competition from four aspects: classified management of state-owned enterprises, market access, burden of operation and return on investment, so as to realize fair competition between state-owned enterprises and other enterprises under ownership; At the same time, in order to create the socialist market economy environment of fair competition, take the fair competition examination as the starting point, realize the competition compliance of the government behavior, carry forward the competition culture vigorously, improve the competition consciousness of the government, enterprise and citizen; China is a socialist market economy guided by Marx's theory. Therefore, the construction of competition system in our country should be guided by Marxist competition theory and socialist economic theory with Chinese characteristics. On this basis, the fair competition of enterprises with different ownership is realized, and the healthy, rapid and sustainable development of state-owned enterprises is realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:F276.1;F271
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫鳳鳴;迎接“入世”必須加快國(guó)企改革[J];湖南經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年02期
2 ;國(guó)企改革面臨新的環(huán)境[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)墾經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年05期
3 朱辛華;會(huì)計(jì)受托責(zé)任運(yùn)用于國(guó)企改革的思考[J];廣西會(huì)計(jì);2000年03期
4 高曉燕;試論私企發(fā)展對(duì)國(guó)企改革的影響[J];江漢論壇;2000年03期
5 王自文;論國(guó)企改革的為“進(jìn)”而“退”──安陽(yáng)市國(guó)企改革調(diào)查[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2000年03期
6 ;打好國(guó)企改革攻堅(jiān)戰(zhàn)[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年05期
7 ;中國(guó)國(guó)企改革與發(fā)展的路今后該怎么走[J];中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義研究;2000年05期
8 ;戴相龍?zhí)岢鲋С謬?guó)企改革的五項(xiàng)措施[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2000年06期
9 楊自忠;國(guó)企改革如何解決原始動(dòng)力問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn);2000年07期
10 謝心敏;“三改一加強(qiáng)”是搞好國(guó)企改革的法寶[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2000年05期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 張金海;張興先;苗金詳;王海燕;;打贏我省國(guó)企改革攻堅(jiān)戰(zhàn)的難點(diǎn)與對(duì)策[A];陜西省體制改革研究會(huì)2006-2007優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2007年
2 丁明常;;論國(guó)企改革與改革方向[A];國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)論叢2001——“企業(yè)家與專家高層論壇:國(guó)企改革新思路學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”論文集[C];2001年
3 張金海;張興先;苗金詳;王海燕;;打贏我省國(guó)企改革攻堅(jiān)戰(zhàn)的難點(diǎn)與對(duì)策[A];陜西省體制改革研究會(huì)2007優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2007年
4 曹文;;國(guó)企改革提速需要開(kāi)放創(chuàng)新思維[A];陜西省體制改革研究會(huì)2006-2007優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2007年
5 林木西;;遼寧省國(guó)企改革與發(fā)展分析[A];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題探索(下)[C];2001年
6 黨興華;;我國(guó)國(guó)企改革的歷史回顧與跨世紀(jì)展望[A];跨世紀(jì)的中國(guó)企業(yè)改革和發(fā)展理論與實(shí)踐研討會(huì)論文集[C];1999年
7 李鴻冰;;“入世”為國(guó)企改革帶來(lái)機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)[A];西部大開(kāi)發(fā) 科教先行與可持續(xù)發(fā)展——中國(guó)科協(xié)2000年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集[C];2000年
8 張興先;;我省國(guó)企改革的重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)與對(duì)策[A];陜西省體制改革研究會(huì)2003優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2003年
9 宋瑋;;論公司治理與國(guó)企改革[A];陜西省體制改革研究會(huì)2003優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2003年
10 唐元;;以各方“共贏”思路推進(jìn)東北國(guó)企改革[A];“深化國(guó)有企業(yè)改革,,振興東北老工業(yè)基地”國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)長(zhǎng)春論壇文集[C];2003年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 張建;增強(qiáng)服務(wù)意識(shí) 積極穩(wěn)妥推進(jìn)國(guó)企改革[N];保定日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
2 記者 程莉莉;國(guó)企改革不到位有兩大原因[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
3 趙曉強(qiáng);我市國(guó)企改革取得突破性進(jìn)展[N];錦州日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
4 王晶;集中力量 全力以赴打好國(guó)企改革攻堅(jiān)戰(zhàn)[N];銅川日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
5 記者 陳茗佳邋實(shí)習(xí)生 何金德;我市國(guó)企改革將向縱深推進(jìn)[N];蘭州日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
6 記者 王凡;把國(guó)資監(jiān)管和國(guó)企改革工作不斷推向深入[N];銅川日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
7 曉紅;市企改辦專題研究國(guó)企改革相關(guān)事宜[N];太原日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
8 記者 李發(fā)偉邋實(shí)習(xí)生 龔靜;齊心破解發(fā)展難題 合力推進(jìn)國(guó)企改革[N];咸陽(yáng)日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
9 姚錫成;國(guó)企改革突出專精特新[N];云南日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
10 記者 韓樂(lè);吳登昌檢查我市防汛和國(guó)企改革[N];渭南日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 陳峗;國(guó)企改革中政企利益沖突與協(xié)調(diào)的研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2005年
2 李俊杰;我國(guó)壟斷國(guó)企改革研究[D];中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年
3 張國(guó)宏;國(guó)企改革中管理層收購(gòu)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2005年
4 陳慶;新中國(guó)國(guó)企改革思想的演進(jìn)[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2015年
5 馮躍;所有制結(jié)構(gòu)、公司治理與國(guó)企改革研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2012年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 朱林可;作為信號(hào)發(fā)送和可置信承諾的國(guó)企改革[D];浙江大學(xué);2007年
2 陳霖東;新時(shí)期以來(lái)小說(shuō)中工人形象流變研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年
3 周磊;遼寧省國(guó)資委對(duì)于企業(yè)遺留人員托管問(wèn)題的管理對(duì)策[D];沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué);2014年
4 甘德富;論國(guó)企改革中政府職能的轉(zhuǎn)變[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
5 季慈華;國(guó)企改革中的地方政府角色研究:從行政主導(dǎo)到市場(chǎng)引導(dǎo)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年
6 周偉;城建領(lǐng)域國(guó)有控股上市公司資產(chǎn)重組戰(zhàn)略研究[D];南京大學(xué);2016年
7 王雨昕;南北車合并案例分析[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年
8 馮娜;國(guó)企改革的關(guān)鍵在于提升全要素生產(chǎn)率[D];中國(guó)財(cái)政科學(xué)研究院;2016年
9 劉暢;走出改革困境的黑龍江國(guó)企工人的生存狀況研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2016年
10 王兩群;深圳JA集團(tuán)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年
本文編號(hào):2323211
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2323211.html