基于阿米巴經(jīng)營模式的QDXA公司績效評價研究
[Abstract]:Japan's entrepreneur, Mr. Inamori Inamori, has established Kyocera and Second Electric Power Company, two of the world's top 500 enterprises, known as the "holy of management". He concluded that his success can not be separated from his first business model - "Amiba" business. The so-called Amiba business model, in short, is to divide the organization into a small group. Amiba's management is based on a firm philosophy of management and fine-grained sectoral independent accounting, which divides the enterprise into "small groups", like Amiba, which divides cells freely and repeatedly - - with each amoeba Let every employee become the leading role, all the staff participate in the operation, rely on all the wisdom and efforts to complete the business objectives of the enterprise, and realize the sustainable development of the enterprise. Selflessness is the greatest motivation to mobilize the enthusiasm of workers, but also the first prerequisite for the implementation of the amoeba business model; the second prerequisite is the so-called "philosophical co-existence", in other words, in the implementation of amoeba business process, the need to coordinate self-interest and altruism, the dialectics of the interests of departments and the overall interests. In addition to Kyocera and KDDI, more and more enterprises have introduced the Amiba business model, which has greatly improved their performance. XA Group began to engage in urban pipeline gas business in 1992 and gradually became the largest distributor of urban gas in China, mainly through franchise agreements. At present, the direction of the reform of the natural gas industry is to promote the separation of network sales according to the European model. After the reform, the monopoly of the gas business enterprise by means of franchise will be broken, and the end-user can directly produce and supply the upstream gas. The party negotiated the procurement of gas sources, the original gas management enterprises opened the gas pipeline network resources, and collected the cost of pipeline transportation. In the past, the days of easy gaining high gas price difference by the monopoly position were coming to an end. At the same time, the arrival of the "Internet plus" era brought great impact on the traditional enterprise management mode, and the traditional management mode was lengthy and inefficient. Because of the above reasons, in order to cope with the future changes in the industry, improve operational efficiency, and improve internal skills, the leadership of XA Group has deeply realized that it is imperative to carry out a change in the organization, the method is Amibaba operation. XA Gas Company, as a benchmarking member of the group, has become one of the first batch of pilot enterprises to apply actively for management reform in recent years with the rapid development of the company, overstaffed organization, cumbersome process, inefficient operation of the enterprise, and declining customer satisfaction. By introducing the operation mode and development trend of the gas industry, the author analyzes the necessity of the company's reform, proves that the model is applicable to the gas industry and the company by studying the theory and specific cases of the amoeba business model. Through the analysis of the company's business, development process and organizational structure, we can get the specific ways of business transformation; think about organizational change smoothly, comb and optimize the internal process, and formulate corresponding supporting policies to meet customer needs as the principle, reduce accounting units, redesign the performance evaluation system, fill Dispatching mobilizes the enthusiasm of employees to achieve a win-win situation between customer value and employee self-value, thus providing a useful reference for the group members and even the gas industry to promote the performance evaluation reform under the Amoeba model.
【學位授予單位】:山東大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F299.24;F275
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 廖紅燕;;淺談企業(yè)績效管理中存在的問題及措施[J];財會學習;2016年13期
2 王任軍;;自我管理團隊的績效管理研究——以京瓷阿米巴為例[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2016年05期
3 付小非;;從績效考核看績效管理[J];人力資源管理;2016年02期
4 王倩;;韓都衣舍:由“三人小組”進化為品牌孵化器[J];商學院;2016年01期
5 申艷艷;;高校專項資金績效評價體系構(gòu)建研究——基于平衡計分卡的視角[J];會計之友;2016年01期
6 王能元;韓鵬飛;;創(chuàng)業(yè)型組織:回歸“小時代”[J];中國工業(yè)評論;2015年12期
7 王秀萍;朱艷;;基于阿米巴模式的績效指標體系探討[J];財會通訊;2014年28期
8 劉舒蘭;;淺談行政主管單位如何做好預算績效管理[J];會計師;2014年19期
9 孫芳;;淺議績效評價問題[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2014年22期
10 饒惠霞;吳海燕;;京瓷&華為:殊途同歸的經(jīng)營哲學[J];企業(yè)管理;2014年07期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條
1 馬小江;LC公司阿米巴模式下的成本管理方案研究[D];西北大學;2013年
2 陳海瀾;基于阿米巴經(jīng)營模式的福建電信網(wǎng)格化發(fā)展研究[D];南昌大學;2013年
3 張鳳冉;戰(zhàn)略實施的阿米巴模式研究[D];廣西大學;2013年
4 汪超群;H公司基于阿米巴模式下的績效評價研究[D];湖南大學;2012年
,本文編號:2175736
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2175736.html