企業(yè)社會責任與企業(yè)避稅（所得稅規(guī)避）程度的關系研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-24 18:23
【摘要】：20世紀初,企業(yè)社會責任概念最早起源于美國,在歷經(jīng)幾十年的發(fā)展后企業(yè)社會責任已經(jīng)演變成一個多維度多層次的概念系統(tǒng)。企業(yè)避稅是否作為企業(yè)對社會責任的承擔這一問題近幾年成為理論界與學術界探討的熱點。通過對國內(nèi)外關于企業(yè)社會責任,企業(yè)避稅的研究文獻梳理可知在企業(yè)社會責任和企業(yè)避稅各自的領域中都具有豐富的研究成果,但對于兩者之間的關系研究并不多。企業(yè)對待避稅的態(tài)度如何?是否將避稅當作對社會責任的不承擔?還是認為降低稅負也有助于企業(yè)承擔社會責任?本文在前人的研究成果的基礎上,通過實證方法探究企業(yè)社會責任與企業(yè)避稅程度之間的關系,并以環(huán)境敏感因素作為新視角更進一步探究兩者之間的關系。本文通過對企業(yè)社會責任相關理論的梳理,以2009-2014年間中國發(fā)布企業(yè)社會責任報告的上市公司為研究樣本,運用實證的方法探究企業(yè)社會責任與企業(yè)避稅程度之間的關系。研究結果表明企業(yè)社會責任表現(xiàn)與企業(yè)避稅程度呈現(xiàn)顯著的負相關關系,說明大部分企業(yè)都能認識到不采取激進的避稅措施應作為承擔社會責任的組成部分,即企業(yè)社會責任對企業(yè)避稅程度具有抑制作用。對于環(huán)境敏感型企業(yè)(重污染),該類型的企業(yè)具有社會責任信息披露的特殊政策規(guī)定所以更易遭受來自公眾的壓力,進而影響企業(yè)的避稅程度。本文對樣本企業(yè)分為環(huán)境敏感型與非敏感型進行分組回歸。結果表明非敏感型企業(yè)的社會責任評分與避稅程度負相關,而敏感型企業(yè)并無此相關性。穩(wěn)健性檢驗中,本文依據(jù)企業(yè)社會責任評分高低進行分組回歸,高分組顯示兩者呈現(xiàn)負相關,低分組并無相關性,該結果使本文結論更具穩(wěn)健性。本文的研究成果對于政府推行社會責任活動、稅務監(jiān)管者的稅收稽查和企業(yè)社會責任觀的形成都具有積極的意義。稅收征管者在進行稅務稽查時,可將企業(yè)社會責任作為判斷企業(yè)避稅程度的指標之一。相關機構也可通過出臺政策對企業(yè)社會責任報告披露給予規(guī)范化,促進企業(yè)社會責任活動的良序發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 20th century, the concept of corporate social responsibility originated in the United States. After decades of development, corporate social responsibility has evolved into a multi-dimensional and multi-level concept system. Whether corporate tax avoidance is the social responsibility of enterprises has become a hot topic in theory and academic circles in recent years. Through the research literature on corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance at home and abroad, we can see that there are rich research results in the field of corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance, but there are few studies on the relationship between the two. What is the attitude of companies to tax avoidance? Does tax avoidance be treated as a non-commitment to social responsibility? Or do you think reducing taxes will also help companies take on social responsibility? Based on the previous research results, this paper explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate tax avoidance by empirical method, and further explores the relationship between CSR and corporate tax avoidance from a new perspective of environmental sensitive factors. By combing the relevant theories of corporate social responsibility and taking the listed companies that issued CSR reports in China from 2009-2014 as the research samples, this paper uses empirical methods to explore the relationship between CSR and corporate tax avoidance. The results show that the performance of corporate social responsibility is negatively related to the degree of corporate tax avoidance, which indicates that most enterprises can realize that not to adopt radical tax avoidance measures should be taken as a component of social responsibility. That is, corporate social responsibility has an inhibitory effect on the degree of corporate tax avoidance. For environment-sensitive enterprises (heavy pollution), this type of enterprises have special policies of social responsibility information disclosure, so they are more vulnerable to pressure from the public, and then affect the degree of corporate tax avoidance. In this paper, the sample enterprises are divided into environmental sensitive type and non-sensitive type for grouping regression. The results show that the social responsibility score of non-sensitive enterprises is negatively correlated with the degree of tax avoidance, but it is not related to sensitive enterprises. In the robustness test, this paper carries on the grouping regression according to the enterprise social responsibility score, the high score group shows negative correlation, the low group has no correlation, this result makes the conclusion of this paper more robust. The research results of this paper are of positive significance for the government to carry out social responsibility activities, the tax supervision of tax regulators and the formation of the concept of corporate social responsibility. Tax collectors can take corporate social responsibility as one of the indicators to judge the degree of tax avoidance. Relevant institutions can also standardize the disclosure of corporate social responsibility reports by issuing policies to promote the orderly development of corporate social responsibility activities.
【學位授予單位】：華僑大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F270;F275.4
本文編號：2142258
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 20th century, the concept of corporate social responsibility originated in the United States. After decades of development, corporate social responsibility has evolved into a multi-dimensional and multi-level concept system. Whether corporate tax avoidance is the social responsibility of enterprises has become a hot topic in theory and academic circles in recent years. Through the research literature on corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance at home and abroad, we can see that there are rich research results in the field of corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance, but there are few studies on the relationship between the two. What is the attitude of companies to tax avoidance? Does tax avoidance be treated as a non-commitment to social responsibility? Or do you think reducing taxes will also help companies take on social responsibility? Based on the previous research results, this paper explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate tax avoidance by empirical method, and further explores the relationship between CSR and corporate tax avoidance from a new perspective of environmental sensitive factors. By combing the relevant theories of corporate social responsibility and taking the listed companies that issued CSR reports in China from 2009-2014 as the research samples, this paper uses empirical methods to explore the relationship between CSR and corporate tax avoidance. The results show that the performance of corporate social responsibility is negatively related to the degree of corporate tax avoidance, which indicates that most enterprises can realize that not to adopt radical tax avoidance measures should be taken as a component of social responsibility. That is, corporate social responsibility has an inhibitory effect on the degree of corporate tax avoidance. For environment-sensitive enterprises (heavy pollution), this type of enterprises have special policies of social responsibility information disclosure, so they are more vulnerable to pressure from the public, and then affect the degree of corporate tax avoidance. In this paper, the sample enterprises are divided into environmental sensitive type and non-sensitive type for grouping regression. The results show that the social responsibility score of non-sensitive enterprises is negatively correlated with the degree of tax avoidance, but it is not related to sensitive enterprises. In the robustness test, this paper carries on the grouping regression according to the enterprise social responsibility score, the high score group shows negative correlation, the low group has no correlation, this result makes the conclusion of this paper more robust. The research results of this paper are of positive significance for the government to carry out social responsibility activities, the tax supervision of tax regulators and the formation of the concept of corporate social responsibility. Tax collectors can take corporate social responsibility as one of the indicators to judge the degree of tax avoidance. Relevant institutions can also standardize the disclosure of corporate social responsibility reports by issuing policies to promote the orderly development of corporate social responsibility activities.
【學位授予單位】：華僑大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F270;F275.4
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 呂偉;張純;周樂燕;;企業(yè)社會責任、風險管理策略與避稅行為[J];上海大學學報(社會科學版);2015年05期
2 劉欣華;呂薩薩;;管理者特征對上市公司避稅行為的影響[J];北京工商大學學報(社會科學版);2015年04期
3 楊楊;湯曉建;杜劍;;企業(yè)社會責任信息披露抑制還是促進了稅收規(guī)避——基于我國深交所中小板民營上市公司數(shù)據(jù)檢驗[J];稅務與經(jīng)濟;2015年04期
4 買生;楊英英;李俊亭;;公司社會責任治理:多理論融合的理論模型[J];管理評論;2015年06期
5 吉黎;毛程連;林志威;;轉(zhuǎn)移支付、稅收努力與企業(yè)避稅——基于中國工業(yè)企業(yè)的實證研究[J];中央財經(jīng)大學學報;2015年03期
6 尹開國;劉小芹;陳華東;;基于內(nèi)生性的企業(yè)社會責任與財務績效關系研究——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];中國軟科學;2014年06期
7 洪震;金莉;;每股社會貢獻值披露現(xiàn)狀分析——基于2008~2011年滬市公司社會責任報告[J];財會月刊;2014年10期
8 魏春燕;;審計師行業(yè)專長與客戶的避稅程度[J];審計研究;2014年02期
9 楊楊;湯曉健;杜劍;;我國中小型民營企業(yè)稅收負擔與企業(yè)價值關系——基于深交所中小板上市公司數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];稅務研究;2014年03期
10 王茂祥;李東;;企業(yè)社會責任風險管理路徑探究[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2013年06期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 張?zhí)烀?管理者與企業(yè)避稅行為研究[D];華中科技大學;2012年
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 王晴晴;企業(yè)社會責任對公司避稅行為的影響研究[D];北京交通大學;2015年
2 曹洋洋;企業(yè)社會責任與稅收規(guī)避[D];廈門大學;2014年
3 李霄霄;上市公司高管對公司避稅行為的影響[D];吉林大學;2012年
4 王帥;董事會特征與上市公司違規(guī)行為實證研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年
，本文編號：2142258
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2142258.html
最近更新
教材專著
