本文選題：高新技術(shù)企業(yè) + 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新��； 參考：《廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著技術(shù)進(jìn)步的不斷加快,科技創(chuàng)新對(duì)于高新技術(shù)企業(yè)來說至關(guān)重要。高新技術(shù)企業(yè)作為科技創(chuàng)新的代表,其核心競爭力在于研發(fā)實(shí)力的強(qiáng)弱,完善而有效的企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新機(jī)制能夠使企業(yè)在市場中獲得競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)。我國制定并實(shí)施了一系列以促進(jìn)高新技術(shù)企業(yè)發(fā)展為目的的優(yōu)惠政策和發(fā)展規(guī)劃,已經(jīng)初見成效。但與發(fā)達(dá)國家的高科技企業(yè)相比,我國高新技術(shù)企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力不強(qiáng),研發(fā)投入不足。企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新機(jī)制的建立依賴于公司治理機(jī)制,公司治理機(jī)制影響著企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新決策和投入。我國正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期,企業(yè)的公司治理機(jī)制尚不健全,這是導(dǎo)致目前高新技術(shù)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力不足的主要原因。企業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新受公司內(nèi)外部治理機(jī)制兩方面因素的影響。內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制是影響科技創(chuàng)新的主要因素,具體包括股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)、董事會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)、管理層激勵(lì)等。外部治理機(jī)制可以對(duì)公司的內(nèi)部治理產(chǎn)生積極影響,從而促進(jìn)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,具體包括控制權(quán)市場、債務(wù)約束和產(chǎn)品市場競爭等機(jī)制。本文首先回顧了公司內(nèi)外部治理機(jī)制與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新相關(guān)性的文獻(xiàn),以及公司治理和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新相關(guān)的理論。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出本文的研究假設(shè),接著以高新技術(shù)上市公司為研究對(duì)象,通過實(shí)證分析公司治理機(jī)制對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響。實(shí)證分析分為兩部分:第一部分首先檢驗(yàn)高新技術(shù)企業(yè)內(nèi)外部治理機(jī)制各要素對(duì)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入的影響。并將樣本公司分為國有企業(yè)組和非國有企業(yè)組,進(jìn)一步探討不同股權(quán)性質(zhì)的企業(yè)公司治理各要素對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入的影響是否存在差異。實(shí)證結(jié)果表明,高新技術(shù)企業(yè)內(nèi)外部治理機(jī)制各要素對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響程度不同。內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制中,實(shí)際控制人的性質(zhì)對(duì)于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入沒有影響;在非國有企業(yè)中前五大股東持股比例與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而在國有企業(yè)中兩者不相關(guān);董事會(huì)規(guī)模、董事長和總經(jīng)理兩職合一對(duì)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入沒有影響;在非國有企業(yè)中獨(dú)立董事比例與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著正相關(guān),但是在國有企業(yè)中兩者顯著負(fù)相關(guān);高管持股比例、高管人員平均年薪與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著正相關(guān);外部治理機(jī)制中,無限售流通股比例與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著正相關(guān);資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著負(fù)相關(guān);國有企業(yè)中產(chǎn)品市場競爭程度與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入顯著正相關(guān),但在非國有企業(yè)中兩者關(guān)系不顯著;第二部分的實(shí)證分析旨在構(gòu)建公司治理機(jī)制的綜合指標(biāo)——公司治理指數(shù),并對(duì)公司治理指數(shù)與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入的關(guān)系進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),進(jìn)一步論證了良好的公司治理機(jī)制能顯著促進(jìn)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的投入。最后,在理論研究和實(shí)證分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文就當(dāng)前我國經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期高新技術(shù)企業(yè)公司治理機(jī)制存在的問題提出了相應(yīng)對(duì)策,并提出了本文的不足之處以及未來研究方向。
[Abstract]:With the continuous acceleration of technological progress, scientific and technological innovation is of great importance to high-tech enterprises.As the representative of scientific and technological innovation, the core competitiveness of high-tech enterprises lies in the strength of R & D. The perfect and effective technological innovation mechanism of enterprises can enable enterprises to obtain competitive advantages in the market.China has formulated and implemented a series of preferential policies and development plans aimed at promoting the development of high-tech enterprises.However, compared with the high-tech enterprises in developed countries, the independent innovation ability and R & D investment of high-tech enterprises in our country are not strong enough.The establishment of enterprise technological innovation mechanism depends on the corporate governance mechanism, which affects the decision and input of enterprise technology innovation.Our country is in the period of economic transformation, the corporate governance mechanism of enterprises is not perfect, which is the main reason leading to the lack of technological innovation ability of high-tech enterprises at present.The innovation of enterprise science and technology is influenced by two factors: internal and external governance mechanism.The internal governance mechanism is the main factor which affects the innovation of science and technology, including the ownership structure, board structure, management incentive and so on.The external governance mechanism can have a positive impact on the internal governance of the company, thus promoting the technological innovation of the enterprise, including the control market, debt constraint and product market competition mechanism.This paper first reviews the literature on the correlation between internal and external corporate governance and technological innovation, as well as the theory of corporate governance and technological innovation.On this basis, this paper puts forward the research hypothesis, and then takes the high-tech listed companies as the research object, and analyzes the influence of the corporate governance mechanism on the technological innovation through empirical analysis.The empirical analysis is divided into two parts: the first part examines the influence of internal and external governance mechanism of high-tech enterprises on technological innovation investment.The sample company is divided into state-owned enterprise group and non-state-owned enterprise group to further explore the influence of different corporate governance factors on technological innovation input.The empirical results show that the factors of internal and external governance mechanism of high-tech enterprises have different influence on technological innovation.In the internal governance mechanism, the nature of the actual controller has no effect on the investment in technological innovation, the proportion of the top five shareholders in the non-state-owned enterprises is negatively correlated with the investment in technological innovation of the enterprises, but the two are not related in the state-owned enterprises.The size of the board of directors, the combination of chairman and general manager have no effect on the investment in technological innovation, the proportion of independent directors in non-state-owned enterprises is positively correlated with the investment in technological innovation, but in state-owned enterprises there is a significant negative correlation between them.The proportion of executive stock ownership, the average annual salary of senior managers and the investment in technological innovation are significantly positive correlation, and in the external governance mechanism, the proportion of unlimited selling and circulating shares is significantly positively correlated with the investment in technological innovation of enterprises.The ratio of assets and liabilities is negatively correlated with the investment of technological innovation of enterprises, the degree of product market competition in state-owned enterprises is positively correlated with the investment of technological innovation of enterprises, but the relationship between them is not significant in non-state-owned enterprises.The second part of the empirical analysis aims to build a comprehensive index of corporate governance mechanism-corporate governance index, and to test the relationship between corporate governance index and technological innovation input.Further demonstrated that a good corporate governance mechanism can significantly promote the input of enterprise technology innovation.Finally, on the basis of theoretical research and empirical analysis, this paper puts forward corresponding countermeasures to the problems existing in the corporate governance mechanism of high-tech enterprises in the period of economic transformation in our country, and puts forward the deficiencies and future research directions of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F276.44;F273.1;F271

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖利平;;公司治理如何影響企業(yè)研發(fā)投入?——來自中國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)考察[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年01期

2 胡振華;熊昱;申婷;;企業(yè)行為與管理層股權(quán)激勵(lì)對(duì)研發(fā)投入影響的實(shí)證研究——以制造業(yè)上市公司為例[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2015年07期

3 陳麗霖;馮星昱;;基于IT行業(yè)的治理結(jié)構(gòu)、R&D投入與企業(yè)績效關(guān)系研究[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2015年03期

4 李云鶴;;公司治理與企業(yè)異質(zhì)研發(fā)創(chuàng)新——基于創(chuàng)業(yè)板戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)上市公司的實(shí)證研究[J];證券市場導(dǎo)報(bào);2014年12期

5 孟丁;余鵬翼;許志超;;高新技術(shù)企業(yè)公司治理對(duì)研發(fā)投資影響的實(shí)證研究——基于行業(yè)差異視角[J];上海金融;2013年05期

6 黃淙淙;;不同高管激勵(lì)方式對(duì)研發(fā)投資的影響——來自民營上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2012年09期

7 王燕妮;;高管激勵(lì)對(duì)研發(fā)投入的影響研究——基于我國制造業(yè)上市公司的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年07期

8 陳昆玉;;創(chuàng)新型企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)、股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)營業(yè)績——來自中國A股市場的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年04期

9 周杰;薛有志;;公司內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制對(duì)R&D投入的影響——基于總經(jīng)理持股與董事會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)的實(shí)證研究[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2008年03期

10 鄭志剛;;法律外制度的公司治理角色——一個(gè)文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];管理世界;2007年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張子峰;公司治理對(duì)企業(yè)R&D投入的影響研究[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 尹哲茗;公司治理對(duì)研發(fā)投入績效的影響[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2015年

2 苗好鑫;西安市高新技術(shù)企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu)與研發(fā)投入的關(guān)系研究[D];西安電子科技大學(xué);2014年

3 陳欽嬋;上市公司治理指數(shù)與公司績效的實(shí)證分析[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

4 邵云;公司治理機(jī)制、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與企業(yè)績效的關(guān)系研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2013年

5 張鐳;公司治理對(duì)R&D投入的影響研究[D];南京工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

6 肖娜;公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)與研發(fā)投入的關(guān)系研究[D];上海外國語大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1761319