本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)集群　切入點(diǎn)：集群環(huán)境　出處：《渤海大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,我國加快了與一些發(fā)達(dá)國家的貿(mào)易往來步伐。近年來,發(fā)達(dá)國家的大中型公司依靠技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)壟斷這一新途徑獲得國際市場的壟斷地位。我國企業(yè)由于受到發(fā)達(dá)國家核心技術(shù)封鎖,再加上企業(yè)自身創(chuàng)新研發(fā)能力相對較弱,迫使我國企業(yè)必須向國外公司繳納高額專利費(fèi),才能獲得一些過時非核心的技術(shù),我國企業(yè)普遍處于價(jià)值鏈低端水平。產(chǎn)業(yè)集群作為提升群內(nèi)企業(yè)競爭力的重要載體,而標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化作為產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整升級的關(guān)鍵舉措,兩者之間相輔相成。然而,目前關(guān)于產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭與群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效的關(guān)系這方面研究涉及的還比較少,產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭能否對群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效產(chǎn)生影響,產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境又是怎么通過標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭來提高群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效的,這些都有待于進(jìn)一步探究。因此,本研究將探討產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭與群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效之間的關(guān)系。本文首先對產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭以及企業(yè)績效相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出本文的理論模型和研究假設(shè),然后對產(chǎn)業(yè)集群內(nèi)的企業(yè),尤以標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化試點(diǎn)企業(yè)的管理者進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查,并運(yùn)用SPSS17.0和AMOS17.0軟件對所搜集的問卷數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,驗(yàn)證了理論假設(shè)并得出了研究結(jié)論:第一,產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境對群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效的提升有正向促進(jìn)作用;第二,產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境對企業(yè)參與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭活動有正向促進(jìn)作用;第三,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭對群內(nèi)企業(yè)績效的提升有正向促進(jìn)作用;第四,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭在產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境與企業(yè)績效之間起著中介作用。針對研究結(jié)論提出以下管理建議:政府充分發(fā)揮政策供給作用,打造產(chǎn)業(yè)集群政策優(yōu)勢;整合集群資源,促進(jìn)創(chuàng)新要素在企業(yè)間合理流動;加強(qiáng)基于信任、合作的集群文化環(huán)境建設(shè);加強(qiáng)市場環(huán)境的規(guī)范性,警惕市場環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn);構(gòu)建產(chǎn)業(yè)聯(lián)盟,主動樹立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭意識。最后,提出了本研究的局限性及展望。
[Abstract]:With the development of the world economy, China has quickened its trade with some developed countries.In recent years, large and medium-sized companies in developed countries rely on the new way of technical standard monopoly to gain the monopoly position in the international market.Because our enterprises are blocked by the core technologies of developed countries, coupled with the relatively weak innovation and R & D capabilities of enterprises themselves, Chinese enterprises have to pay high patent fees to foreign companies in order to obtain some outdated non-core technologies.Chinese enterprises are generally at the low end of the value chain.Industrial cluster is an important carrier to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises in the cluster, and standardization is a key measure in the adjustment and upgrading of industrial structure, which complement each other.However, there are few researches on the relationship between the standard competition and the performance of the enterprises in the cluster environment, and whether the standard competition can affect the performance of the enterprises in the cluster.How to improve enterprise performance through standard competition in industrial cluster environment needs to be further explored.Therefore, this study will explore the relationship between industrial cluster environment, standard competition and intra-group enterprise performance.This paper firstly combs the literature about industrial cluster environment, standard competition and enterprise performance, and then puts forward the theoretical model and research hypothesis of this paper, and then analyzes the enterprises in industrial cluster.In particular, the managers of standardized pilot enterprises conduct questionnaires, and use SPSS17.0 and AMOS17.0 software to carry out statistical analysis of the collected questionnaire data, verify the theoretical assumptions and draw the conclusions: first,The industrial cluster environment has a positive effect on the improvement of enterprise performance in the cluster; second, the industrial cluster environment has a positive role in promoting the participation of enterprises in standard competition activities; third, standard competition has a positive role in promoting the performance of enterprises in the cluster.Fourth, standard competition plays an intermediary role between industrial cluster environment and enterprise performance.In view of the conclusions of the study, the following management suggestions are put forward: the government should give full play to the role of policy supply, create the policy advantages of industrial clusters, integrate cluster resources, promote the rational flow of innovation elements among enterprises, strengthen the trust based on,It is necessary to strengthen the standardization of market environment, to be alert to market environmental risk, to construct industrial alliance and to set up standard competition consciousness.Finally, the limitations and prospects of this study are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F273.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮衛(wèi)紅;胡建玲;;旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)集群網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)與企業(yè)績效關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2016年02期

2 武優(yōu)勐;張紅俠;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境對農(nóng)民工創(chuàng)業(yè)能力影響的探索[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2015年09期

3 趙驊;王鳳蓮;;企業(yè)集群技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力的內(nèi)涵與基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境提升方式研究[J];科技管理研究;2014年24期

4 王蕾;周梅華;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群環(huán)境與品牌提升關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年05期

5 徐敏燕;左和平;;行為機(jī)制、組織環(huán)境與產(chǎn)業(yè)集群演化——以景德鎮(zhèn)陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)為例[J];江西社會科學(xué);2013年04期

6 張泳;黃柳婷;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭、組織創(chuàng)新和組織績效之間的關(guān)系研究[J];科技管理研究;2013年07期

7 魏江;向永勝;;文化嵌入與集群發(fā)展的共演機(jī)制研究[J];自然辯證法研究;2012年03期

8 張龍;張運(yùn)生;;高科技企業(yè)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)定價(jià)研究[J];中國科技論壇;2010年08期

9 吉慶華;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群政策的比較與分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2010年03期

10 楊武;吳海燕;楊成鵬;;基于“技術(shù)—市場—規(guī)制”模型的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭力綜合評價(jià)研究[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2010年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 閆濤;ICT產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)動態(tài)博弈及企業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭戰(zhàn)略研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2008年

2 李波;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)效應(yīng)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競爭模式研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1707168