本文選題：民營(yíng)企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：海外進(jìn)入模式　出處：《廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體對(duì)外直接投資的快速發(fā)展,新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體跨國(guó)公司在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化中扮演的角色也越來越重要,這種現(xiàn)象引起了學(xué)者們的廣泛關(guān)注。尤其在轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國(guó),民營(yíng)企業(yè)對(duì)GDP的貢獻(xiàn)逐漸增加,隨著“走出去”戰(zhàn)略的不斷深入,民營(yíng)企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資存量也從2006年占比19%躍升到2015年占比49.7%,而對(duì)外直接投資進(jìn)入模式是民營(yíng)企業(yè)重大海外戰(zhàn)略之一,對(duì)民營(yíng)企業(yè)東道國(guó)海外市場(chǎng)子公司的績(jī)效與發(fā)展前景起著至關(guān)重要的作用�？鐕�(guó)企業(yè)進(jìn)入模式也一直是國(guó)際商務(wù)領(lǐng)域和戰(zhàn)略管理領(lǐng)域共同關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)問題,眾多國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者從國(guó)家層面、產(chǎn)業(yè)層面和企業(yè)層面研究了影響跨國(guó)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式的因素,然而,聚焦中國(guó)情境,以民營(yíng)企業(yè)進(jìn)入模式為對(duì)象的研究較少。本文基于轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)的制度情境,聚焦民營(yíng)企業(yè),整合“制度理論”、“社會(huì)資本理論”和“海外進(jìn)入模式理論”等視角,考慮母國(guó)制度環(huán)境、社會(huì)資本、規(guī)制差異和文化差異等四個(gè)方面的因素對(duì)民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式的影響機(jī)制。在對(duì)現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行綜述和梳理后,構(gòu)建了研究概念模型,確定了探究母國(guó)制度環(huán)境與民企海外進(jìn)入模式關(guān)系的研究方法,并進(jìn)一步確立兩者關(guān)系。首先,在確定母國(guó)制度環(huán)境影響民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式選擇的基礎(chǔ)上,加入了規(guī)制差異和文化差異,進(jìn)一步研究它們對(duì)母國(guó)制度環(huán)境與海外進(jìn)入模式關(guān)系的調(diào)節(jié)作用;其次,在考慮到中國(guó)制度情境,將社會(huì)資本作為影響海外進(jìn)入模式的一個(gè)重要因素,研究其在中國(guó)制度環(huán)境與民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外市場(chǎng)進(jìn)入模式之間的中介作用。最后,提出6個(gè)研究假設(shè)以更加深入地探究母國(guó)制度環(huán)境對(duì)民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式的影響情況。本文以A股中進(jìn)行對(duì)外直接投資的上市民營(yíng)企業(yè)作為研究對(duì)象,收集并整理了210家企業(yè)在2015年的234次對(duì)外直接投資的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用SPSS19.0中Logistic回歸分析等多種統(tǒng)計(jì)分析方法對(duì)理論模型和研究假設(shè)進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),得到如下研究結(jié)論:(1)企業(yè)所屬區(qū)域的制度環(huán)境與其海外獨(dú)資進(jìn)入模式正相關(guān)。(2)規(guī)制差異和文化差異負(fù)向調(diào)節(jié)母國(guó)制度環(huán)境與民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式間的關(guān)系。(3)社會(huì)資本在母國(guó)制度環(huán)境與民營(yíng)企業(yè)海外進(jìn)入模式間具有部分中介作用。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging economies, the role of multinational corporations in the global economic integration is becoming more and more important. This phenomenon has attracted the attention of scholars, especially in China in the transition period. The contribution of private enterprises to GDP is gradually increasing, and with the development of "going out" strategy, The stock of foreign direct investment of private enterprises also jumped from 19% in 2006 to 49.7% in 2015, and the entry mode of foreign direct investment is one of the major overseas strategies of private enterprises. It plays an important role in the performance and development prospects of the overseas market subsidiaries of the host country of private enterprises. The entry mode of multinational enterprises has also been a hot issue in the field of international business and strategic management. Many scholars at home and abroad have studied the factors that affect the overseas entry mode of multinational enterprises at the national, industrial and enterprise levels. However, focusing on the Chinese context, Based on the institutional situation in China during the transition period, this paper focuses on private enterprises and integrates the perspectives of "institutional theory", "social capital theory" and "overseas entry mode theory". Considering the influence mechanism of home country institutional environment, social capital, regulatory differences and cultural differences on the overseas entry mode of private enterprises, this paper summarizes and combs the existing literature, and constructs a conceptual model of the research. This paper determines the research methods of exploring the relationship between the home country institutional environment and the overseas entry mode of private enterprises, and further establishes the relationship between the two. Firstly, on the basis of determining the influence of the home country institutional environment on the choice of the private enterprises' overseas entry mode, The regulatory and cultural differences are added to further study their role in regulating the relationship between the home country's institutional environment and the overseas entry model. Secondly, considering the Chinese institutional situation, Taking social capital as an important factor to influence the overseas entry model, the paper studies its intermediary role between the Chinese institutional environment and the overseas market entry model of private enterprises. Six research hypotheses are put forward to explore the influence of home country institutional environment on the overseas entry mode of private enterprises. This paper collects and collates the relevant data of 234 foreign direct investment (FDI) of 210 enterprises in 2015, and empirically tests theoretical models and research hypotheses by using Logistic regression analysis and other statistical analysis methods in SPSS19.0. The conclusion of this study is as follows: (1) the institutional environment of the region to which the enterprise belongs is positively related to the entry mode of its sole proprietorship abroad. (2) the regulatory differences and cultural differences negatively regulate the relationship between the institutional environment of the home country and the overseas entry model of private enterprises. The capital plays an intermediary role between the institutional environment of the home country and the overseas entry mode of private enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F276.5;F125

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳菲瓊;虞旭丹;;企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)自主創(chuàng)新的反饋機(jī)制研究:以萬向集團(tuán)OFDI為例[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年03期

2 董朝暉;;以對(duì)外直接投資促進(jìn)我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)[J];改革與開放;2000年02期

3 楊勇,武曉韻;日中對(duì)外直接投資發(fā)展的比較研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2000年05期

4 金仁淑;二戰(zhàn)后日美對(duì)外直接投資戰(zhàn)略比較[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年03期

5 廖紅;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];廣西經(jīng)貿(mào);2000年09期

6 劉海云;中小企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的理論思考[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

7 王家春,仰書綱;淺談發(fā)展中國(guó)家的對(duì)外直接投資[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2000年03期

8 李萍;試論對(duì)外直接投資的重要意義[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年09期

9 金仁淑;戰(zhàn)后日本對(duì)外直接投資發(fā)展及內(nèi)在機(jī)制[J];日本學(xué)論壇;2000年02期

10 喬紅;我國(guó)發(fā)展對(duì)外直接投資若干問題的研究[J];運(yùn)城高專學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 馬常娥;;對(duì)外直接投資:韓國(guó)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟迪[A];江蘇省外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說研究會(huì)2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

2 王天龍;;加快我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的對(duì)策建議[A];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析與展望（2012～2013）[C];2013年

3 韓進(jìn)旺;;戰(zhàn)后的日本對(duì)外直接投資[A];對(duì)外貿(mào)易外語系科研論文集（第一期）[C];1992年

4 金新亮;;對(duì)外直接投資的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策選擇[A];陜西省經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)會(huì)員代表會(huì)議暨第22次年會(huì)論文集[C];2002年

5 李穎俊;高敏雪;;對(duì)外直接投資發(fā)展階段的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[A];北京市第十二次統(tǒng)計(jì)科學(xué)討論會(huì)論文選編[C];2003年

6 胡平;夏保雄;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的特點(diǎn)及戰(zhàn)略選擇[A];山西省科學(xué)技術(shù)情報(bào)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

7 項(xiàng)本武;;對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)投資的影響——基于中國(guó)數(shù)據(jù)的協(xié)整分析[A];中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說研究會(huì)第十四次學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文摘要文集[C];2006年

8 趙春明;;論反傾銷對(duì)對(duì)外直接投資的影響及其啟示——以美國(guó)為例[A];全國(guó)美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)會(huì)長(zhǎng)擴(kuò)大會(huì)議暨“當(dāng)代世界經(jīng)濟(jì)格局下的中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2005年

9 尹顯萍;劉燕;;對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)不同行業(yè)對(duì)外貿(mào)易的影響——以美國(guó)為例的分析[A];全國(guó)美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)第八屆會(huì)員代表大會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

10 朱鐘棣;劉凱敏;;技術(shù)進(jìn)步是推動(dòng)我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的重要原因[A];上海市經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年刊（2007）[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 新華社記者 王建生;美國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)[N];中國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)金融報(bào);2001年

2 盧錚;今年我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資將增30%[N];中國(guó)證券報(bào);2007年

3 ;中國(guó)累計(jì)對(duì)外直接投資712億美元[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

4 杜海濤;一季度我非金融類對(duì)外直接投資增22.7%[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

5 薛黎;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資增勢(shì)強(qiáng)勁 去年達(dá)211.6億美元[N];上海證券報(bào);2007年

6 江國(guó)成邋劉雪;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資凈額 去年全球排名第13位[N];中國(guó)信息報(bào);2007年

7 辜t，

本文編號(hào)：1678171