本文關(guān)鍵詞： “類國(guó)企化” 政府干預(yù) 產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng) 創(chuàng)新效率　出處：《石河子大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)前現(xiàn)狀的分析與現(xiàn)階段文獻(xiàn)的閱讀與梳理,將民企在要素資源獲取方式、產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)參與方式方面采取與國(guó)企相類似的經(jīng)營(yíng)發(fā)展路徑定義為民企的“類國(guó)企化”取向,并通過(guò)探討“類國(guó)企化”的創(chuàng)新效率損失,理論論證民企的“類國(guó)企化”對(duì)微觀企業(yè)以及產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的關(guān)系�；谏鲜隹紤],本文主要研究了如下3個(gè)問(wèn)題:(1)民企中的“類國(guó)企化”取向是否普遍存在,如果存在,民營(yíng)企業(yè)“類國(guó)企化”是通過(guò)何種路徑形成。(2)民企的這種“理性選擇”在我國(guó)市場(chǎng)化改革不斷深化并日益凸顯其法制經(jīng)濟(jì)之本質(zhì)特征的背景下,將會(huì)對(duì)企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新效率產(chǎn)生何種影響?本文試圖理清“類國(guó)企化”取向作用于企業(yè)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的背后機(jī)制,從而為政府在未來(lái)制定企業(yè)政策時(shí)提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)。(3)政府干預(yù)作為影響民企“類國(guó)企化”取向的制度淵源,在政府干預(yù)嚴(yán)重時(shí),民企的“類國(guó)企化”與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率的結(jié)果是否更顯著。文章選取了2007-2015年滬深A(yù)股上市公司樣本,剔除金融業(yè)、ST及PT的上市公司數(shù)據(jù)、同時(shí)發(fā)行B股或H股的公司、數(shù)據(jù)缺失企業(yè),最終得到9216個(gè)樣本觀測(cè)值。實(shí)證研究了諸多民企的“類國(guó)企化”取向會(huì)造成民企的創(chuàng)新效率損失,以及其通過(guò)產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)有調(diào)節(jié)的中介效應(yīng)從而造成民企更大程度的創(chuàng)新效率損失。進(jìn)一步研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在政府干預(yù)嚴(yán)重的地區(qū),民企的“類國(guó)企化”取向通過(guò)產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)造成企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率損失的結(jié)果更加顯著。上述發(fā)現(xiàn)為中國(guó)國(guó)企改革及其治理提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)啟示的同時(shí),也為中國(guó)諸多民企的“類國(guó)企化”經(jīng)營(yíng)取向及其創(chuàng)新效率損失提供了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)警示意義。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the present situation of our country and the reading and combing of the literature at the present stage, this paper attempts to obtain the mode of obtaining the factor resources of the private enterprises. In the aspect of product market competition and participation, we adopt the management and development path similar to that of state-owned enterprises and define them as "quasi-state-owned enterprises", and discuss the loss of innovation efficiency of "quasi-state-owned enterprises". Based on the above considerations, this paper mainly studies the following three questions: (1) whether or not the orientation of "quasi-state-owned enterprises" exists generally in private enterprises, and if so, In the background of the deepening of China's market-oriented reform and the increasing prominence of the essential characteristics of its legal economy, this "rational choice" of private enterprises is formed through what path. What impact will it have on the efficiency of innovation? This paper attempts to clarify the mechanism behind the action of the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation on enterprise innovation activities, thus providing empirical evidence for the government in formulating enterprise policy in the future) government intervention as the institutional origin of influencing the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation of private enterprises. When government intervention is serious, the results of "SOE" and innovation efficiency of private enterprises are more significant. This paper selects a sample of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007 to 2015, and excludes the data of St and PT listed companies in the financial sector. Companies that issue B-shares or H-shares at the same time, the companies with missing data, finally get 9216 sample observations. The empirical study shows that the "quasi-state-owned" orientation of many private enterprises will result in the loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. And its mediating effect through product market competition, resulting in a greater loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. Further studies have found that in areas where government intervention is serious, The result of the loss of innovation efficiency caused by the competition in the product market is more remarkable. The above findings provide experience and enlightenment for the reform and governance of state-owned enterprises in China. It also provides the risk warning significance for the management orientation and the loss of innovation efficiency of many private enterprises in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：石河子大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F276.5;F273.1;F274

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾萍;呂迪偉;劉洋;;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、政治關(guān)聯(lián)與政府創(chuàng)新支持:機(jī)制與路徑[J];科研管理;2016年07期

2 鐘昀珈;張晨宇;陳德球;;國(guó)企民營(yíng)化與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率:促進(jìn)還是抑制?[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2016年07期

3 徐業(yè)坤;李維安;;政績(jī)推動(dòng)、政治關(guān)聯(lián)與民營(yíng)企業(yè)投資擴(kuò)張[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年05期

4 杜勇;陳建英;;政治關(guān)聯(lián)、慈善捐贈(zèng)與政府補(bǔ)助——來(lái)自中國(guó)虧損上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2016年05期

5 孫鳳娥;田治威;蘇寧;;政治關(guān)聯(lián)、融資約束與資本結(jié)構(gòu)周期性變動(dòng)[J];現(xiàn)代財(cái)經(jīng)(天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2016年04期

6 鄧曉飛;辛宇;滕飛;;官員獨(dú)立董事強(qiáng)制辭職與政治關(guān)聯(lián)喪失[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年02期

7 姚晶晶;鞠冬;張建君;;企業(yè)是否會(huì)近墨者黑:企業(yè)規(guī)模、政府重要性與企業(yè)政治行為[J];管理世界;2015年07期

8 白俊;姚盛;;銀行業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、企業(yè)高管權(quán)力與企業(yè)現(xiàn)金持有[J];金融論壇;2015年04期

9 邱兆林;;政府干預(yù)、企業(yè)自主研發(fā)與高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新——基于中國(guó)省級(jí)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2015年04期

10 楊汝岱;;中國(guó)制造業(yè)企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1551812