【摘要】：城市,特別是區(qū)域中心城市,如何處理好與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的關(guān)系,具有十分重要意義。區(qū)域中心城市是國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要增長(zhǎng)極,其文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展對(duì)于區(qū)域中心城市及區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)圈的整體發(fā)展具有重要影響。本文基于區(qū)域中心城市發(fā)展,結(jié)合區(qū)域中心城市的發(fā)展特征及功能定位,研究區(qū)域中心城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展特征,進(jìn)而為區(qū)域中心城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)啟示。 區(qū)域中心城市的城市功能特征決定了區(qū)域中心城市的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展必然不同于一般城市。區(qū)域中心城市的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展不僅要滿足國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)快速增長(zhǎng)帶來(lái)的高漲的精神文化需求,還要滿足工業(yè)制造規(guī)�；髮�(duì)文化附加值的更高需求。某些區(qū)域中心城市還要滿足國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略優(yōu)勢(shì)造就的外部市場(chǎng)的需求。在此背景下,本文的創(chuàng)新性的提出了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的二分法,將文化產(chǎn)業(yè)中用于中間投入(中間需求)的部分定義為生產(chǎn)性文化產(chǎn)業(yè),將文化產(chǎn)業(yè)中用于個(gè)體最終消費(fèi)的部分定義為生活性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)。在此理論基礎(chǔ)上,選取了北京、上海、深圳、昆明作為案例進(jìn)行研究分析。 通過(guò)北京、上海、深圳、昆明的四個(gè)區(qū)域中心城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)行研究,得出區(qū)域中心城市不僅要發(fā)展生活性文化產(chǎn)業(yè),也要重視發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)。北京、上海、深圳由于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)、市場(chǎng)體制健全,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展較為成熟,表現(xiàn)出一致特征,即生產(chǎn)性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展迅速,擴(kuò)展了區(qū)域中心城市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的輻射區(qū)域,增強(qiáng)了城市集聚、擴(kuò)散和創(chuàng)新功能,促進(jìn)區(qū)域資源再配置、要素再整合；其生活性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)繁榮,大力創(chuàng)新文化內(nèi)容,豐富文化產(chǎn)品及服務(wù)的多樣性,不斷滿足區(qū)域內(nèi)不同層次的文化消費(fèi)需求,并與城市文化特色相結(jié)合,將文化創(chuàng)意融入城市文化與城市建設(shè)之中,提升了城市魅力。而昆明正處于文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,生活性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)需要進(jìn)一步提升,生產(chǎn)性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)需要進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。 本文在對(duì)區(qū)域中心城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展內(nèi)在特征闡述的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步總結(jié)了區(qū)域中心城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn)啟示,主要從提升生活性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)、夯實(shí)生產(chǎn)性文化產(chǎn)業(yè)、加快文化產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚發(fā)展、完善文化市場(chǎng)體系、引進(jìn)和培育人才、改善城市人文環(huán)境等六方面。
[Abstract]:It is of great significance for cities, especially regional central cities, to deal with the relationship with the development of cultural industry. Regional central city is an important growth pole of national economic development, and the development of its cultural industry has an important impact on the overall development of regional central city and regional economic circle. Based on the development of regional central city and the function orientation of regional central city, this paper studies the development characteristics of regional central city's cultural industry, and then provides experience and enlightenment for the development of regional central city's cultural industry. The urban function of the regional central city determines that the cultural industry development of the regional central city must be different from that of the general city. The development of cultural industry in regional central cities should not only meet the high spiritual and cultural needs brought about by the rapid growth of national economy, but also meet the higher demand for cultural added value after the scale of industrial manufacturing. Some regional central cities also meet the needs of external markets created by national strategic advantages. Under this background, this paper puts forward the dichotomy of cultural industry innovatively, and defines the part of cultural industry used as intermediate input (intermediate demand) as productive cultural industry. The part of cultural industry used for individual final consumption is defined as living culture industry. On the basis of this theory, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Kunming are selected as case studies. Through the research on the cultural industry of four regional central cities in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Kunming, it is concluded that the regional central cities should not only develop living cultural industries, but also attach importance to the development of productive cultural industries. Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen have developed economies, sound market systems, and more mature cultural industries, showing consistent characteristics, namely, the rapid development of productive cultural industries, which has expanded the radiation region of producer services in regional central cities. It strengthens the functions of urban agglomeration, diffusion and innovation, and promotes the regional resource reallocation and the reintegration of the elements. Its living and living cultural industry flourishes, vigorously innovates the cultural content, enriches the diversity of cultural products and services, continuously meets the cultural consumption needs of different levels in the region, and combines with the urban cultural characteristics. The integration of cultural creativity into urban culture and urban construction enhances the charm of the city. But Kunming is in the key period of cultural industry development and transformation, the living culture industry needs to be further promoted, and the productive cultural industry needs to be further developed. On the basis of expounding the inherent characteristics of the development of cultural industry in regional central city, this paper further summarizes the experience and enlightenment of the development of cultural industry in regional central city, mainly from promoting the living culture industry and ramming up the productive cultural industry. We should speed up the development of cultural industry agglomeration, perfect the cultural market system, introduce and cultivate talents, and improve the urban humanistic environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳石清;李健健;龔芳;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)影響的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2010年06期

2 郭寶華;李麗萍;;區(qū)域中心城市機(jī)理解析[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(西部論壇);2007年02期

3 袁劍雄;;文化資源與區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2009年12期

4 李冬,陳紅兵;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的基本特征及發(fā)展動(dòng)力[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

5 花建;;發(fā)展文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè) 促進(jìn)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)[J];東岳論叢;2009年10期

6 厲無(wú)畏;王慧敏;;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變——機(jī)理·模式·路徑[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年11期

7 王承旭;;城市文化的空間解讀[J];規(guī)劃師;2006年04期

8 陳柳欽;;國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于產(chǎn)業(yè)集群技術(shù)創(chuàng)新環(huán)境研究綜述[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

9 王道軍;;文化及創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)的“上海模式”[J];上海國(guó)資;2010年11期

10 王緝慈;知識(shí)創(chuàng)新和區(qū)域創(chuàng)新環(huán)境[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;1999年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 吉林省中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論研究中心 執(zhí)筆人 楊舟賢;[N];吉林日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 郭梅君;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的互動(dòng)研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2011年

2 苗建軍;論區(qū)域性中心城市的發(fā)展道路[D];四川大學(xué);2003年

3 王偉年;城市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)位因素及地域組織研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年

4 代文;現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集群的形成和發(fā)展研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2007年

5 徐艷芳;區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)發(fā)的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王花毅;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)聚集中的產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2010年

2 袁宇杰;區(qū)域中心城市旅游業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];青島大學(xué);2005年

3 劉強(qiáng);區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

4 溫燕;武漢文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2008年

5 曹曼君;戰(zhàn)后紐約文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究（1945-1975）[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2414340